Cargando…

Dynamic changes in ORC localization and replication fork progression during tissue differentiation

BACKGROUND: Genomic regions repressed for DNA replication, resulting in either delayed replication in S phase or underreplication in polyploid cells, are thought to be controlled by inhibition of replication origin activation. Studies in Drosophila polytene cells, however, raised the possibility tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hua, Brian L., Bell, George W., Kashevsky, Helena, Von Stetina, Jessica R., Orr-Weaver, Terry L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6103881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30134926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4992-3
_version_ 1783349389047103488
author Hua, Brian L.
Bell, George W.
Kashevsky, Helena
Von Stetina, Jessica R.
Orr-Weaver, Terry L.
author_facet Hua, Brian L.
Bell, George W.
Kashevsky, Helena
Von Stetina, Jessica R.
Orr-Weaver, Terry L.
author_sort Hua, Brian L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genomic regions repressed for DNA replication, resulting in either delayed replication in S phase or underreplication in polyploid cells, are thought to be controlled by inhibition of replication origin activation. Studies in Drosophila polytene cells, however, raised the possibility that impeding replication fork progression also plays a major role. RESULTS: We exploited genomic regions underreplicated (URs) with tissue specificity in Drosophila polytene cells to analyze mechanisms of replication repression. By localizing the Origin Recognition Complex (ORC) in the genome of the larval fat body and comparing this to ORC binding in the salivary gland, we found that sites of ORC binding show extensive tissue specificity. In contrast, there are common domains nearly devoid of ORC in the salivary gland and fat body that also have reduced density of ORC binding sites in diploid cells. Strikingly, domains lacking ORC can still be replicated in some polytene tissues, showing absence of ORC and origins is insufficient to repress replication. Analysis of the width and location of the URs with respect to ORC position indicates that whether or not a genomic region lacking ORC is replicated is controlled by whether replication forks formed outside the region are inhibited. CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate that inhibition of replication fork progression can block replication across genomic regions that constitutively lack ORC. Replication fork progression can be inhibited in both tissue-specific and genome region-specific ways. Consequently, when evaluating sources of genome instability it is important to consider altered control of replication forks in response to differentiation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-4992-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6103881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61038812018-08-30 Dynamic changes in ORC localization and replication fork progression during tissue differentiation Hua, Brian L. Bell, George W. Kashevsky, Helena Von Stetina, Jessica R. Orr-Weaver, Terry L. BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Genomic regions repressed for DNA replication, resulting in either delayed replication in S phase or underreplication in polyploid cells, are thought to be controlled by inhibition of replication origin activation. Studies in Drosophila polytene cells, however, raised the possibility that impeding replication fork progression also plays a major role. RESULTS: We exploited genomic regions underreplicated (URs) with tissue specificity in Drosophila polytene cells to analyze mechanisms of replication repression. By localizing the Origin Recognition Complex (ORC) in the genome of the larval fat body and comparing this to ORC binding in the salivary gland, we found that sites of ORC binding show extensive tissue specificity. In contrast, there are common domains nearly devoid of ORC in the salivary gland and fat body that also have reduced density of ORC binding sites in diploid cells. Strikingly, domains lacking ORC can still be replicated in some polytene tissues, showing absence of ORC and origins is insufficient to repress replication. Analysis of the width and location of the URs with respect to ORC position indicates that whether or not a genomic region lacking ORC is replicated is controlled by whether replication forks formed outside the region are inhibited. CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate that inhibition of replication fork progression can block replication across genomic regions that constitutively lack ORC. Replication fork progression can be inhibited in both tissue-specific and genome region-specific ways. Consequently, when evaluating sources of genome instability it is important to consider altered control of replication forks in response to differentiation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-4992-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6103881/ /pubmed/30134926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4992-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hua, Brian L.
Bell, George W.
Kashevsky, Helena
Von Stetina, Jessica R.
Orr-Weaver, Terry L.
Dynamic changes in ORC localization and replication fork progression during tissue differentiation
title Dynamic changes in ORC localization and replication fork progression during tissue differentiation
title_full Dynamic changes in ORC localization and replication fork progression during tissue differentiation
title_fullStr Dynamic changes in ORC localization and replication fork progression during tissue differentiation
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic changes in ORC localization and replication fork progression during tissue differentiation
title_short Dynamic changes in ORC localization and replication fork progression during tissue differentiation
title_sort dynamic changes in orc localization and replication fork progression during tissue differentiation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6103881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30134926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4992-3
work_keys_str_mv AT huabrianl dynamicchangesinorclocalizationandreplicationforkprogressionduringtissuedifferentiation
AT bellgeorgew dynamicchangesinorclocalizationandreplicationforkprogressionduringtissuedifferentiation
AT kashevskyhelena dynamicchangesinorclocalizationandreplicationforkprogressionduringtissuedifferentiation
AT vonstetinajessicar dynamicchangesinorclocalizationandreplicationforkprogressionduringtissuedifferentiation
AT orrweaverterryl dynamicchangesinorclocalizationandreplicationforkprogressionduringtissuedifferentiation