Cargando…
Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Testing to Target Treatment to Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
OBJECTIVE: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are shown to facilitate a risk identification of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) into different risk levels of progression to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Knowing a patient’s risk level provides an opportunity for earlier interventions, whic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6103924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29623628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0054-z |
_version_ | 1783349390897840128 |
---|---|
author | Michaud, Tzeyu L. Kane, Robert L. McCarten, J. Riley Gaugler, Joseph E. Nyman, John A. Kuntz, Karen M. |
author_facet | Michaud, Tzeyu L. Kane, Robert L. McCarten, J. Riley Gaugler, Joseph E. Nyman, John A. Kuntz, Karen M. |
author_sort | Michaud, Tzeyu L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are shown to facilitate a risk identification of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) into different risk levels of progression to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Knowing a patient’s risk level provides an opportunity for earlier interventions, which could result in potential greater benefits. We assessed the cost effectiveness of the use of CSF biomarkers in MCI patients where the treatment decision was based on patients’ risk level. METHODS: We developed a state-transition model to project lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs for a cohort of 65-year-old MCI patients from a US societal perspective. We compared four test-and-treat strategies where the decision to treat was based on a patient’s risk level (low, intermediate, high) of progressing to AD with two strategies without testing, one where no patients were treated during the MCI phase and in the other all patients were treated. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to evaluate parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: Testing and treating low-risk MCI patients was the most cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$37,700 per QALY. Our results were most sensitive to the level of treatment effectiveness for patients with mild AD and for MCI patients. Moreover, the ICERs for this strategy at the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles were US$18,900 and US$50,100 per QALY, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the best available evidence regarding the treatment effectiveness for MCI, this study suggests the potential value of performing CSF biomarker testing for early targeted treatments among MCI patients with a narrow range for the ICER. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s41669-017-0054-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6103924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61039242018-08-27 Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Testing to Target Treatment to Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Michaud, Tzeyu L. Kane, Robert L. McCarten, J. Riley Gaugler, Joseph E. Nyman, John A. Kuntz, Karen M. Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are shown to facilitate a risk identification of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) into different risk levels of progression to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Knowing a patient’s risk level provides an opportunity for earlier interventions, which could result in potential greater benefits. We assessed the cost effectiveness of the use of CSF biomarkers in MCI patients where the treatment decision was based on patients’ risk level. METHODS: We developed a state-transition model to project lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs for a cohort of 65-year-old MCI patients from a US societal perspective. We compared four test-and-treat strategies where the decision to treat was based on a patient’s risk level (low, intermediate, high) of progressing to AD with two strategies without testing, one where no patients were treated during the MCI phase and in the other all patients were treated. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to evaluate parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: Testing and treating low-risk MCI patients was the most cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$37,700 per QALY. Our results were most sensitive to the level of treatment effectiveness for patients with mild AD and for MCI patients. Moreover, the ICERs for this strategy at the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles were US$18,900 and US$50,100 per QALY, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the best available evidence regarding the treatment effectiveness for MCI, this study suggests the potential value of performing CSF biomarker testing for early targeted treatments among MCI patients with a narrow range for the ICER. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s41669-017-0054-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6103924/ /pubmed/29623628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0054-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Michaud, Tzeyu L. Kane, Robert L. McCarten, J. Riley Gaugler, Joseph E. Nyman, John A. Kuntz, Karen M. Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Testing to Target Treatment to Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title | Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Testing to Target Treatment to Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_full | Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Testing to Target Treatment to Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_fullStr | Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Testing to Target Treatment to Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Testing to Target Treatment to Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_short | Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Testing to Target Treatment to Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_sort | using cerebrospinal fluid biomarker testing to target treatment to patients with mild cognitive impairment: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6103924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29623628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0054-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT michaudtzeyul usingcerebrospinalfluidbiomarkertestingtotargettreatmenttopatientswithmildcognitiveimpairmentacosteffectivenessanalysis AT kanerobertl usingcerebrospinalfluidbiomarkertestingtotargettreatmenttopatientswithmildcognitiveimpairmentacosteffectivenessanalysis AT mccartenjriley usingcerebrospinalfluidbiomarkertestingtotargettreatmenttopatientswithmildcognitiveimpairmentacosteffectivenessanalysis AT gauglerjosephe usingcerebrospinalfluidbiomarkertestingtotargettreatmenttopatientswithmildcognitiveimpairmentacosteffectivenessanalysis AT nymanjohna usingcerebrospinalfluidbiomarkertestingtotargettreatmenttopatientswithmildcognitiveimpairmentacosteffectivenessanalysis AT kuntzkarenm usingcerebrospinalfluidbiomarkertestingtotargettreatmenttopatientswithmildcognitiveimpairmentacosteffectivenessanalysis |