Cargando…

Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Testing to Target Treatment to Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

OBJECTIVE: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are shown to facilitate a risk identification of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) into different risk levels of progression to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Knowing a patient’s risk level provides an opportunity for earlier interventions, whic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michaud, Tzeyu L., Kane, Robert L., McCarten, J. Riley, Gaugler, Joseph E., Nyman, John A., Kuntz, Karen M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6103924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29623628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0054-z
_version_ 1783349390897840128
author Michaud, Tzeyu L.
Kane, Robert L.
McCarten, J. Riley
Gaugler, Joseph E.
Nyman, John A.
Kuntz, Karen M.
author_facet Michaud, Tzeyu L.
Kane, Robert L.
McCarten, J. Riley
Gaugler, Joseph E.
Nyman, John A.
Kuntz, Karen M.
author_sort Michaud, Tzeyu L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are shown to facilitate a risk identification of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) into different risk levels of progression to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Knowing a patient’s risk level provides an opportunity for earlier interventions, which could result in potential greater benefits. We assessed the cost effectiveness of the use of CSF biomarkers in MCI patients where the treatment decision was based on patients’ risk level. METHODS: We developed a state-transition model to project lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs for a cohort of 65-year-old MCI patients from a US societal perspective. We compared four test-and-treat strategies where the decision to treat was based on a patient’s risk level (low, intermediate, high) of progressing to AD with two strategies without testing, one where no patients were treated during the MCI phase and in the other all patients were treated. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to evaluate parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: Testing and treating low-risk MCI patients was the most cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$37,700 per QALY. Our results were most sensitive to the level of treatment effectiveness for patients with mild AD and for MCI patients. Moreover, the ICERs for this strategy at the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles were US$18,900 and US$50,100 per QALY, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the best available evidence regarding the treatment effectiveness for MCI, this study suggests the potential value of performing CSF biomarker testing for early targeted treatments among MCI patients with a narrow range for the ICER. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s41669-017-0054-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6103924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61039242018-08-27 Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Testing to Target Treatment to Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Michaud, Tzeyu L. Kane, Robert L. McCarten, J. Riley Gaugler, Joseph E. Nyman, John A. Kuntz, Karen M. Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are shown to facilitate a risk identification of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) into different risk levels of progression to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Knowing a patient’s risk level provides an opportunity for earlier interventions, which could result in potential greater benefits. We assessed the cost effectiveness of the use of CSF biomarkers in MCI patients where the treatment decision was based on patients’ risk level. METHODS: We developed a state-transition model to project lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs for a cohort of 65-year-old MCI patients from a US societal perspective. We compared four test-and-treat strategies where the decision to treat was based on a patient’s risk level (low, intermediate, high) of progressing to AD with two strategies without testing, one where no patients were treated during the MCI phase and in the other all patients were treated. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to evaluate parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: Testing and treating low-risk MCI patients was the most cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$37,700 per QALY. Our results were most sensitive to the level of treatment effectiveness for patients with mild AD and for MCI patients. Moreover, the ICERs for this strategy at the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles were US$18,900 and US$50,100 per QALY, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the best available evidence regarding the treatment effectiveness for MCI, this study suggests the potential value of performing CSF biomarker testing for early targeted treatments among MCI patients with a narrow range for the ICER. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s41669-017-0054-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6103924/ /pubmed/29623628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0054-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Michaud, Tzeyu L.
Kane, Robert L.
McCarten, J. Riley
Gaugler, Joseph E.
Nyman, John A.
Kuntz, Karen M.
Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Testing to Target Treatment to Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Testing to Target Treatment to Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Testing to Target Treatment to Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_fullStr Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Testing to Target Treatment to Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Testing to Target Treatment to Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_short Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Testing to Target Treatment to Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_sort using cerebrospinal fluid biomarker testing to target treatment to patients with mild cognitive impairment: a cost-effectiveness analysis
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6103924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29623628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0054-z
work_keys_str_mv AT michaudtzeyul usingcerebrospinalfluidbiomarkertestingtotargettreatmenttopatientswithmildcognitiveimpairmentacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT kanerobertl usingcerebrospinalfluidbiomarkertestingtotargettreatmenttopatientswithmildcognitiveimpairmentacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT mccartenjriley usingcerebrospinalfluidbiomarkertestingtotargettreatmenttopatientswithmildcognitiveimpairmentacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT gauglerjosephe usingcerebrospinalfluidbiomarkertestingtotargettreatmenttopatientswithmildcognitiveimpairmentacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT nymanjohna usingcerebrospinalfluidbiomarkertestingtotargettreatmenttopatientswithmildcognitiveimpairmentacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT kuntzkarenm usingcerebrospinalfluidbiomarkertestingtotargettreatmenttopatientswithmildcognitiveimpairmentacosteffectivenessanalysis