Cargando…

Dual-layer spectral computed tomography: measuring relative electron density

BACKGROUND: X-ray and particle radiation therapy planning requires accurate estimation of local electron density within the patient body to calculate dose delivery to tumour regions. We evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of electron density measurement using dual-layer computed tomography (DLCT),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mei, Kai, Ehn, Sebastian, Oechsner, Markus, Kopp, Felix K., Pfeiffer, Daniela, Fingerle, Alexander A., Pfeiffer, Franz, Combs, Stephanie E., Wilkens, Jan J., Rummeny, Ernst J., Noël, Peter B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6103960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30175319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-018-0051-8
_version_ 1783349393276010496
author Mei, Kai
Ehn, Sebastian
Oechsner, Markus
Kopp, Felix K.
Pfeiffer, Daniela
Fingerle, Alexander A.
Pfeiffer, Franz
Combs, Stephanie E.
Wilkens, Jan J.
Rummeny, Ernst J.
Noël, Peter B.
author_facet Mei, Kai
Ehn, Sebastian
Oechsner, Markus
Kopp, Felix K.
Pfeiffer, Daniela
Fingerle, Alexander A.
Pfeiffer, Franz
Combs, Stephanie E.
Wilkens, Jan J.
Rummeny, Ernst J.
Noël, Peter B.
author_sort Mei, Kai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: X-ray and particle radiation therapy planning requires accurate estimation of local electron density within the patient body to calculate dose delivery to tumour regions. We evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of electron density measurement using dual-layer computed tomography (DLCT), a recently introduced dual-energy CT technique. METHODS: Two calibration phantoms were scanned with DLCT and virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) at 50 keV and 200 keV were generated. We investigated two approaches to obtain relative electron densities from these VMIs: to fit an analytic interaction cross-sectional model and to empirically calibrate a conversion function with one of the phantoms. Knowledge of the emitted x-ray spectrum was not required for the presented work. RESULTS: The results from both methods were highly correlated to the nominal values (R > 0.999). Except for the water and lung inserts, the error was within 1.79% (average 1.53%) for the cross-sectional model and 1.61% (average 0.87%) for the calibrated conversion. Different radiation doses did not have a significant influence on the measurement (p = 0.348, 0.167), suggesting that the methods are reproducible. Further, we applied these methods to routine clinical data. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows a high validity of electron density estimation based on DLCT, which has potential to improve the procedure and accuracy of measuring electron density in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6103960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61039602018-08-30 Dual-layer spectral computed tomography: measuring relative electron density Mei, Kai Ehn, Sebastian Oechsner, Markus Kopp, Felix K. Pfeiffer, Daniela Fingerle, Alexander A. Pfeiffer, Franz Combs, Stephanie E. Wilkens, Jan J. Rummeny, Ernst J. Noël, Peter B. Eur Radiol Exp Original Article BACKGROUND: X-ray and particle radiation therapy planning requires accurate estimation of local electron density within the patient body to calculate dose delivery to tumour regions. We evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of electron density measurement using dual-layer computed tomography (DLCT), a recently introduced dual-energy CT technique. METHODS: Two calibration phantoms were scanned with DLCT and virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) at 50 keV and 200 keV were generated. We investigated two approaches to obtain relative electron densities from these VMIs: to fit an analytic interaction cross-sectional model and to empirically calibrate a conversion function with one of the phantoms. Knowledge of the emitted x-ray spectrum was not required for the presented work. RESULTS: The results from both methods were highly correlated to the nominal values (R > 0.999). Except for the water and lung inserts, the error was within 1.79% (average 1.53%) for the cross-sectional model and 1.61% (average 0.87%) for the calibrated conversion. Different radiation doses did not have a significant influence on the measurement (p = 0.348, 0.167), suggesting that the methods are reproducible. Further, we applied these methods to routine clinical data. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows a high validity of electron density estimation based on DLCT, which has potential to improve the procedure and accuracy of measuring electron density in clinical practice. Springer International Publishing 2018-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6103960/ /pubmed/30175319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-018-0051-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mei, Kai
Ehn, Sebastian
Oechsner, Markus
Kopp, Felix K.
Pfeiffer, Daniela
Fingerle, Alexander A.
Pfeiffer, Franz
Combs, Stephanie E.
Wilkens, Jan J.
Rummeny, Ernst J.
Noël, Peter B.
Dual-layer spectral computed tomography: measuring relative electron density
title Dual-layer spectral computed tomography: measuring relative electron density
title_full Dual-layer spectral computed tomography: measuring relative electron density
title_fullStr Dual-layer spectral computed tomography: measuring relative electron density
title_full_unstemmed Dual-layer spectral computed tomography: measuring relative electron density
title_short Dual-layer spectral computed tomography: measuring relative electron density
title_sort dual-layer spectral computed tomography: measuring relative electron density
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6103960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30175319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-018-0051-8
work_keys_str_mv AT meikai duallayerspectralcomputedtomographymeasuringrelativeelectrondensity
AT ehnsebastian duallayerspectralcomputedtomographymeasuringrelativeelectrondensity
AT oechsnermarkus duallayerspectralcomputedtomographymeasuringrelativeelectrondensity
AT koppfelixk duallayerspectralcomputedtomographymeasuringrelativeelectrondensity
AT pfeifferdaniela duallayerspectralcomputedtomographymeasuringrelativeelectrondensity
AT fingerlealexandera duallayerspectralcomputedtomographymeasuringrelativeelectrondensity
AT pfeifferfranz duallayerspectralcomputedtomographymeasuringrelativeelectrondensity
AT combsstephaniee duallayerspectralcomputedtomographymeasuringrelativeelectrondensity
AT wilkensjanj duallayerspectralcomputedtomographymeasuringrelativeelectrondensity
AT rummenyernstj duallayerspectralcomputedtomographymeasuringrelativeelectrondensity
AT noelpeterb duallayerspectralcomputedtomographymeasuringrelativeelectrondensity