Cargando…
Electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers
In recent years, electrical myostimulation (EMS) is becoming more and more popular to increase muscle function and muscle weight. Especially it is applied in healthy individual after injury to rebuild muscle mass and in severely atrophic patients who are not able or willing to perform conventional e...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30028092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12332 |
_version_ | 1783349426789548032 |
---|---|
author | Adams, Volker |
author_facet | Adams, Volker |
author_sort | Adams, Volker |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent years, electrical myostimulation (EMS) is becoming more and more popular to increase muscle function and muscle weight. Especially it is applied in healthy individual after injury to rebuild muscle mass and in severely atrophic patients who are not able or willing to perform conventional exercise training programs. Studies in experimental models as well as in human subjects confirmed that EMS can increase muscle mass by around 1% and improve muscle function by around 10–15% after 5–6 weeks of treatment. Despite a severe increase in circulating creatine kinase during the first session, EMS can be regarded as a safe therapeutic intervention. At the molecular level, EMS improves the anabolic/catabolic balance and stimulates the regenerative capacity of satellite cells. EMS intensity should be as high as individually tolerated, and a minimum of three sessions per week [large pulses (between 300–450 μs), high frequency (50–100 Hz in young and around 30 Hz in older individuals)] for at least 5–6 weeks should be performed. EMS improved functional performances more effectively than voluntary training and counteracted fast type muscle fibre atrophy, typically associated with sarcopenia. The effect of superimposing EMS on conventional exercise training to achieve more muscle mass and better function is still discussed controversially. Nevertheless, EMS should not be regarded as a replacement of exercise training per se, since the beneficial effect of exercise training is not just relying on building muscle mass but it also exerts positive effects on endothelial, myocardial, and cognitive function. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6104107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61041072018-08-27 Electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers Adams, Volker J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Editorials In recent years, electrical myostimulation (EMS) is becoming more and more popular to increase muscle function and muscle weight. Especially it is applied in healthy individual after injury to rebuild muscle mass and in severely atrophic patients who are not able or willing to perform conventional exercise training programs. Studies in experimental models as well as in human subjects confirmed that EMS can increase muscle mass by around 1% and improve muscle function by around 10–15% after 5–6 weeks of treatment. Despite a severe increase in circulating creatine kinase during the first session, EMS can be regarded as a safe therapeutic intervention. At the molecular level, EMS improves the anabolic/catabolic balance and stimulates the regenerative capacity of satellite cells. EMS intensity should be as high as individually tolerated, and a minimum of three sessions per week [large pulses (between 300–450 μs), high frequency (50–100 Hz in young and around 30 Hz in older individuals)] for at least 5–6 weeks should be performed. EMS improved functional performances more effectively than voluntary training and counteracted fast type muscle fibre atrophy, typically associated with sarcopenia. The effect of superimposing EMS on conventional exercise training to achieve more muscle mass and better function is still discussed controversially. Nevertheless, EMS should not be regarded as a replacement of exercise training per se, since the beneficial effect of exercise training is not just relying on building muscle mass but it also exerts positive effects on endothelial, myocardial, and cognitive function. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-20 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6104107/ /pubmed/30028092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12332 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Editorials Adams, Volker Electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers |
title | Electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers |
title_full | Electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers |
title_fullStr | Electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers |
title_full_unstemmed | Electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers |
title_short | Electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers |
title_sort | electromyostimulation to fight atrophy and to build muscle: facts and numbers |
topic | Editorials |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30028092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12332 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adamsvolker electromyostimulationtofightatrophyandtobuildmusclefactsandnumbers |