Cargando…
Mechanical Properties of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
BACKGROUND: Various biomechanical properties of adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices have been observed among previous studies in which different experimental conditions were used to test each of these devices. However, no studies have investigated the biomechanical properties of single adjus...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118791183 |
_version_ | 1783349449619144704 |
---|---|
author | Iuchi, Ryo Mae, Tatsuo Tachibana, Yuta Shino, Konsei Nakagawa, Shigeto Yoshikawa, Hideki Nakata, Ken |
author_facet | Iuchi, Ryo Mae, Tatsuo Tachibana, Yuta Shino, Konsei Nakagawa, Shigeto Yoshikawa, Hideki Nakata, Ken |
author_sort | Iuchi, Ryo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Various biomechanical properties of adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices have been observed among previous studies in which different experimental conditions were used to test each of these devices. However, no studies have investigated the biomechanical properties of single adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices under different cyclic loading protocols. It is necessary to clarify the problems associated with using this device and detect the best method of using it in the clinical setting. HYPOTHESIS: The elongation of the loop of an adjustable-loop cortical suspension device with cyclic loading would be smaller with (1) an increase in the lower force limit and (2) lower speeds of cyclic loading. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eighteen anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices were tested under the following 3 cyclic loading protocols in a device-only model. Protocol A included cyclic loading between 10 and 50 N at 50 mm/min for 500 cycles. The upper force limit was then increased by 25-N increments every 500 cycles up to 250 N, for a total of 4500 cycles. Protocol B included cyclic loading between 30 and 50 N at 50 mm/min for 500 cycles. The upper force limit was then increased to 250 N, for a total of 4500 cycles, in the same manner as protocol A. Protocol C included cyclic loading between 30 and 50 N at 25 mm/min for 500 cycles. The upper force limit was then increased to 250 N, for a total of 4500 cycles, in the same manner as protocol A. RESULTS: The elongation after 4500 cycles was 36.1, 18.5, and 8.6 mm for protocols A, B, and C, respectively. There were significant differences among the 3 protocols, with protocol C showing the smallest elongation with cyclic loading. The elongation in each group progressed with each 25-N cyclic load increment. CONCLUSION: The adjustable-loop cortical suspension device showed a smaller elongation of the loop with increases in the lower force limit and with lower cyclic loading speeds. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Care should be taken during rehabilitation after anatomic ACL reconstruction using adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices with a low initial tension at graft fixation. Slow and less intense exercises may be more desirable in the early stages of healing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6104212 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61042122018-08-27 Mechanical Properties of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Iuchi, Ryo Mae, Tatsuo Tachibana, Yuta Shino, Konsei Nakagawa, Shigeto Yoshikawa, Hideki Nakata, Ken Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Various biomechanical properties of adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices have been observed among previous studies in which different experimental conditions were used to test each of these devices. However, no studies have investigated the biomechanical properties of single adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices under different cyclic loading protocols. It is necessary to clarify the problems associated with using this device and detect the best method of using it in the clinical setting. HYPOTHESIS: The elongation of the loop of an adjustable-loop cortical suspension device with cyclic loading would be smaller with (1) an increase in the lower force limit and (2) lower speeds of cyclic loading. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eighteen anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices were tested under the following 3 cyclic loading protocols in a device-only model. Protocol A included cyclic loading between 10 and 50 N at 50 mm/min for 500 cycles. The upper force limit was then increased by 25-N increments every 500 cycles up to 250 N, for a total of 4500 cycles. Protocol B included cyclic loading between 30 and 50 N at 50 mm/min for 500 cycles. The upper force limit was then increased to 250 N, for a total of 4500 cycles, in the same manner as protocol A. Protocol C included cyclic loading between 30 and 50 N at 25 mm/min for 500 cycles. The upper force limit was then increased to 250 N, for a total of 4500 cycles, in the same manner as protocol A. RESULTS: The elongation after 4500 cycles was 36.1, 18.5, and 8.6 mm for protocols A, B, and C, respectively. There were significant differences among the 3 protocols, with protocol C showing the smallest elongation with cyclic loading. The elongation in each group progressed with each 25-N cyclic load increment. CONCLUSION: The adjustable-loop cortical suspension device showed a smaller elongation of the loop with increases in the lower force limit and with lower cyclic loading speeds. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Care should be taken during rehabilitation after anatomic ACL reconstruction using adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices with a low initial tension at graft fixation. Slow and less intense exercises may be more desirable in the early stages of healing. SAGE Publications 2018-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6104212/ /pubmed/30151403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118791183 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Iuchi, Ryo Mae, Tatsuo Tachibana, Yuta Shino, Konsei Nakagawa, Shigeto Yoshikawa, Hideki Nakata, Ken Mechanical Properties of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title | Mechanical Properties of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_full | Mechanical Properties of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Mechanical Properties of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanical Properties of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_short | Mechanical Properties of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_sort | mechanical properties of an adjustable-loop cortical suspension device for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118791183 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iuchiryo mechanicalpropertiesofanadjustableloopcorticalsuspensiondeviceforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT maetatsuo mechanicalpropertiesofanadjustableloopcorticalsuspensiondeviceforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT tachibanayuta mechanicalpropertiesofanadjustableloopcorticalsuspensiondeviceforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT shinokonsei mechanicalpropertiesofanadjustableloopcorticalsuspensiondeviceforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT nakagawashigeto mechanicalpropertiesofanadjustableloopcorticalsuspensiondeviceforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT yoshikawahideki mechanicalpropertiesofanadjustableloopcorticalsuspensiondeviceforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT nakataken mechanicalpropertiesofanadjustableloopcorticalsuspensiondeviceforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction |