Cargando…

Mechanical Properties of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Various biomechanical properties of adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices have been observed among previous studies in which different experimental conditions were used to test each of these devices. However, no studies have investigated the biomechanical properties of single adjus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iuchi, Ryo, Mae, Tatsuo, Tachibana, Yuta, Shino, Konsei, Nakagawa, Shigeto, Yoshikawa, Hideki, Nakata, Ken
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118791183
_version_ 1783349449619144704
author Iuchi, Ryo
Mae, Tatsuo
Tachibana, Yuta
Shino, Konsei
Nakagawa, Shigeto
Yoshikawa, Hideki
Nakata, Ken
author_facet Iuchi, Ryo
Mae, Tatsuo
Tachibana, Yuta
Shino, Konsei
Nakagawa, Shigeto
Yoshikawa, Hideki
Nakata, Ken
author_sort Iuchi, Ryo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various biomechanical properties of adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices have been observed among previous studies in which different experimental conditions were used to test each of these devices. However, no studies have investigated the biomechanical properties of single adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices under different cyclic loading protocols. It is necessary to clarify the problems associated with using this device and detect the best method of using it in the clinical setting. HYPOTHESIS: The elongation of the loop of an adjustable-loop cortical suspension device with cyclic loading would be smaller with (1) an increase in the lower force limit and (2) lower speeds of cyclic loading. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eighteen anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices were tested under the following 3 cyclic loading protocols in a device-only model. Protocol A included cyclic loading between 10 and 50 N at 50 mm/min for 500 cycles. The upper force limit was then increased by 25-N increments every 500 cycles up to 250 N, for a total of 4500 cycles. Protocol B included cyclic loading between 30 and 50 N at 50 mm/min for 500 cycles. The upper force limit was then increased to 250 N, for a total of 4500 cycles, in the same manner as protocol A. Protocol C included cyclic loading between 30 and 50 N at 25 mm/min for 500 cycles. The upper force limit was then increased to 250 N, for a total of 4500 cycles, in the same manner as protocol A. RESULTS: The elongation after 4500 cycles was 36.1, 18.5, and 8.6 mm for protocols A, B, and C, respectively. There were significant differences among the 3 protocols, with protocol C showing the smallest elongation with cyclic loading. The elongation in each group progressed with each 25-N cyclic load increment. CONCLUSION: The adjustable-loop cortical suspension device showed a smaller elongation of the loop with increases in the lower force limit and with lower cyclic loading speeds. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Care should be taken during rehabilitation after anatomic ACL reconstruction using adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices with a low initial tension at graft fixation. Slow and less intense exercises may be more desirable in the early stages of healing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6104212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61042122018-08-27 Mechanical Properties of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Iuchi, Ryo Mae, Tatsuo Tachibana, Yuta Shino, Konsei Nakagawa, Shigeto Yoshikawa, Hideki Nakata, Ken Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Various biomechanical properties of adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices have been observed among previous studies in which different experimental conditions were used to test each of these devices. However, no studies have investigated the biomechanical properties of single adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices under different cyclic loading protocols. It is necessary to clarify the problems associated with using this device and detect the best method of using it in the clinical setting. HYPOTHESIS: The elongation of the loop of an adjustable-loop cortical suspension device with cyclic loading would be smaller with (1) an increase in the lower force limit and (2) lower speeds of cyclic loading. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eighteen anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices were tested under the following 3 cyclic loading protocols in a device-only model. Protocol A included cyclic loading between 10 and 50 N at 50 mm/min for 500 cycles. The upper force limit was then increased by 25-N increments every 500 cycles up to 250 N, for a total of 4500 cycles. Protocol B included cyclic loading between 30 and 50 N at 50 mm/min for 500 cycles. The upper force limit was then increased to 250 N, for a total of 4500 cycles, in the same manner as protocol A. Protocol C included cyclic loading between 30 and 50 N at 25 mm/min for 500 cycles. The upper force limit was then increased to 250 N, for a total of 4500 cycles, in the same manner as protocol A. RESULTS: The elongation after 4500 cycles was 36.1, 18.5, and 8.6 mm for protocols A, B, and C, respectively. There were significant differences among the 3 protocols, with protocol C showing the smallest elongation with cyclic loading. The elongation in each group progressed with each 25-N cyclic load increment. CONCLUSION: The adjustable-loop cortical suspension device showed a smaller elongation of the loop with increases in the lower force limit and with lower cyclic loading speeds. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Care should be taken during rehabilitation after anatomic ACL reconstruction using adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices with a low initial tension at graft fixation. Slow and less intense exercises may be more desirable in the early stages of healing. SAGE Publications 2018-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6104212/ /pubmed/30151403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118791183 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Iuchi, Ryo
Mae, Tatsuo
Tachibana, Yuta
Shino, Konsei
Nakagawa, Shigeto
Yoshikawa, Hideki
Nakata, Ken
Mechanical Properties of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title Mechanical Properties of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_full Mechanical Properties of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_fullStr Mechanical Properties of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical Properties of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_short Mechanical Properties of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_sort mechanical properties of an adjustable-loop cortical suspension device for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118791183
work_keys_str_mv AT iuchiryo mechanicalpropertiesofanadjustableloopcorticalsuspensiondeviceforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT maetatsuo mechanicalpropertiesofanadjustableloopcorticalsuspensiondeviceforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT tachibanayuta mechanicalpropertiesofanadjustableloopcorticalsuspensiondeviceforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT shinokonsei mechanicalpropertiesofanadjustableloopcorticalsuspensiondeviceforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT nakagawashigeto mechanicalpropertiesofanadjustableloopcorticalsuspensiondeviceforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT yoshikawahideki mechanicalpropertiesofanadjustableloopcorticalsuspensiondeviceforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT nakataken mechanicalpropertiesofanadjustableloopcorticalsuspensiondeviceforanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction