Cargando…
Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Furcation Perforation Repair Materials – Glass Ionomer Cement Type II, Hydroxyapatite, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Biodentine: An in vitro Study
BACKGROUND: A furcation perforation is mid-curvature opening into periodontal ligament space which is a worst possible outcome in root canal treatment. Perforations should immediately be repaired with a biocompatible material to seal the communication between perforation site and gingival sulcus. AI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30166836 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_162_18 |
_version_ | 1783349477729370112 |
---|---|
author | Singla, Metashi Verma, Kanika Gupta Goyal, Virinder Jusuja, Purshottam Kakkar, Ashish Ahuja, Lovejeet |
author_facet | Singla, Metashi Verma, Kanika Gupta Goyal, Virinder Jusuja, Purshottam Kakkar, Ashish Ahuja, Lovejeet |
author_sort | Singla, Metashi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A furcation perforation is mid-curvature opening into periodontal ligament space which is a worst possible outcome in root canal treatment. Perforations should immediately be repaired with a biocompatible material to seal the communication between perforation site and gingival sulcus. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the push-out bond strength of glass ionomer cement, hydroxyapatite, mineral trioxide aggregate, and biodentine (BD) when used in repairing furcal perforations with and without blood contamination in permanent molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 human extracted molars were collected and divided on the basis of perforation repair materials and blood contamination status (n = 15). All the materials were subjected to universal testing machine to a load cell from 0 N to 100 KN at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS version 20.0. Results and CONCLUSION: The push-out bond strength was maximum in BD contaminated with blood and least for the hydroxyapatite contaminated with blood. A significant difference was found between all the perforation repair materials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6104374 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61043742018-08-30 Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Furcation Perforation Repair Materials – Glass Ionomer Cement Type II, Hydroxyapatite, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Biodentine: An in vitro Study Singla, Metashi Verma, Kanika Gupta Goyal, Virinder Jusuja, Purshottam Kakkar, Ashish Ahuja, Lovejeet Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: A furcation perforation is mid-curvature opening into periodontal ligament space which is a worst possible outcome in root canal treatment. Perforations should immediately be repaired with a biocompatible material to seal the communication between perforation site and gingival sulcus. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the push-out bond strength of glass ionomer cement, hydroxyapatite, mineral trioxide aggregate, and biodentine (BD) when used in repairing furcal perforations with and without blood contamination in permanent molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 human extracted molars were collected and divided on the basis of perforation repair materials and blood contamination status (n = 15). All the materials were subjected to universal testing machine to a load cell from 0 N to 100 KN at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS version 20.0. Results and CONCLUSION: The push-out bond strength was maximum in BD contaminated with blood and least for the hydroxyapatite contaminated with blood. A significant difference was found between all the perforation repair materials. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6104374/ /pubmed/30166836 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_162_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Singla, Metashi Verma, Kanika Gupta Goyal, Virinder Jusuja, Purshottam Kakkar, Ashish Ahuja, Lovejeet Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Furcation Perforation Repair Materials – Glass Ionomer Cement Type II, Hydroxyapatite, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Biodentine: An in vitro Study |
title | Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Furcation Perforation Repair Materials – Glass Ionomer Cement Type II, Hydroxyapatite, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Biodentine: An in vitro Study |
title_full | Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Furcation Perforation Repair Materials – Glass Ionomer Cement Type II, Hydroxyapatite, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Biodentine: An in vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Furcation Perforation Repair Materials – Glass Ionomer Cement Type II, Hydroxyapatite, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Biodentine: An in vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Furcation Perforation Repair Materials – Glass Ionomer Cement Type II, Hydroxyapatite, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Biodentine: An in vitro Study |
title_short | Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Furcation Perforation Repair Materials – Glass Ionomer Cement Type II, Hydroxyapatite, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Biodentine: An in vitro Study |
title_sort | comparison of push-out bond strength of furcation perforation repair materials – glass ionomer cement type ii, hydroxyapatite, mineral trioxide aggregate, and biodentine: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30166836 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_162_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singlametashi comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthoffurcationperforationrepairmaterialsglassionomercementtypeiihydroxyapatitemineraltrioxideaggregateandbiodentineaninvitrostudy AT vermakanikagupta comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthoffurcationperforationrepairmaterialsglassionomercementtypeiihydroxyapatitemineraltrioxideaggregateandbiodentineaninvitrostudy AT goyalvirinder comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthoffurcationperforationrepairmaterialsglassionomercementtypeiihydroxyapatitemineraltrioxideaggregateandbiodentineaninvitrostudy AT jusujapurshottam comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthoffurcationperforationrepairmaterialsglassionomercementtypeiihydroxyapatitemineraltrioxideaggregateandbiodentineaninvitrostudy AT kakkarashish comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthoffurcationperforationrepairmaterialsglassionomercementtypeiihydroxyapatitemineraltrioxideaggregateandbiodentineaninvitrostudy AT ahujalovejeet comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthoffurcationperforationrepairmaterialsglassionomercementtypeiihydroxyapatitemineraltrioxideaggregateandbiodentineaninvitrostudy |