Cargando…

Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Furcation Perforation Repair Materials – Glass Ionomer Cement Type II, Hydroxyapatite, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Biodentine: An in vitro Study

BACKGROUND: A furcation perforation is mid-curvature opening into periodontal ligament space which is a worst possible outcome in root canal treatment. Perforations should immediately be repaired with a biocompatible material to seal the communication between perforation site and gingival sulcus. AI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singla, Metashi, Verma, Kanika Gupta, Goyal, Virinder, Jusuja, Purshottam, Kakkar, Ashish, Ahuja, Lovejeet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30166836
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_162_18
_version_ 1783349477729370112
author Singla, Metashi
Verma, Kanika Gupta
Goyal, Virinder
Jusuja, Purshottam
Kakkar, Ashish
Ahuja, Lovejeet
author_facet Singla, Metashi
Verma, Kanika Gupta
Goyal, Virinder
Jusuja, Purshottam
Kakkar, Ashish
Ahuja, Lovejeet
author_sort Singla, Metashi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A furcation perforation is mid-curvature opening into periodontal ligament space which is a worst possible outcome in root canal treatment. Perforations should immediately be repaired with a biocompatible material to seal the communication between perforation site and gingival sulcus. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the push-out bond strength of glass ionomer cement, hydroxyapatite, mineral trioxide aggregate, and biodentine (BD) when used in repairing furcal perforations with and without blood contamination in permanent molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 human extracted molars were collected and divided on the basis of perforation repair materials and blood contamination status (n = 15). All the materials were subjected to universal testing machine to a load cell from 0 N to 100 KN at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS version 20.0. Results and CONCLUSION: The push-out bond strength was maximum in BD contaminated with blood and least for the hydroxyapatite contaminated with blood. A significant difference was found between all the perforation repair materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6104374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61043742018-08-30 Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Furcation Perforation Repair Materials – Glass Ionomer Cement Type II, Hydroxyapatite, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Biodentine: An in vitro Study Singla, Metashi Verma, Kanika Gupta Goyal, Virinder Jusuja, Purshottam Kakkar, Ashish Ahuja, Lovejeet Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: A furcation perforation is mid-curvature opening into periodontal ligament space which is a worst possible outcome in root canal treatment. Perforations should immediately be repaired with a biocompatible material to seal the communication between perforation site and gingival sulcus. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the push-out bond strength of glass ionomer cement, hydroxyapatite, mineral trioxide aggregate, and biodentine (BD) when used in repairing furcal perforations with and without blood contamination in permanent molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 human extracted molars were collected and divided on the basis of perforation repair materials and blood contamination status (n = 15). All the materials were subjected to universal testing machine to a load cell from 0 N to 100 KN at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS version 20.0. Results and CONCLUSION: The push-out bond strength was maximum in BD contaminated with blood and least for the hydroxyapatite contaminated with blood. A significant difference was found between all the perforation repair materials. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6104374/ /pubmed/30166836 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_162_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singla, Metashi
Verma, Kanika Gupta
Goyal, Virinder
Jusuja, Purshottam
Kakkar, Ashish
Ahuja, Lovejeet
Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Furcation Perforation Repair Materials – Glass Ionomer Cement Type II, Hydroxyapatite, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Biodentine: An in vitro Study
title Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Furcation Perforation Repair Materials – Glass Ionomer Cement Type II, Hydroxyapatite, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Biodentine: An in vitro Study
title_full Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Furcation Perforation Repair Materials – Glass Ionomer Cement Type II, Hydroxyapatite, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Biodentine: An in vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Furcation Perforation Repair Materials – Glass Ionomer Cement Type II, Hydroxyapatite, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Biodentine: An in vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Furcation Perforation Repair Materials – Glass Ionomer Cement Type II, Hydroxyapatite, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Biodentine: An in vitro Study
title_short Comparison of Push-Out Bond Strength of Furcation Perforation Repair Materials – Glass Ionomer Cement Type II, Hydroxyapatite, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Biodentine: An in vitro Study
title_sort comparison of push-out bond strength of furcation perforation repair materials – glass ionomer cement type ii, hydroxyapatite, mineral trioxide aggregate, and biodentine: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30166836
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_162_18
work_keys_str_mv AT singlametashi comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthoffurcationperforationrepairmaterialsglassionomercementtypeiihydroxyapatitemineraltrioxideaggregateandbiodentineaninvitrostudy
AT vermakanikagupta comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthoffurcationperforationrepairmaterialsglassionomercementtypeiihydroxyapatitemineraltrioxideaggregateandbiodentineaninvitrostudy
AT goyalvirinder comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthoffurcationperforationrepairmaterialsglassionomercementtypeiihydroxyapatitemineraltrioxideaggregateandbiodentineaninvitrostudy
AT jusujapurshottam comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthoffurcationperforationrepairmaterialsglassionomercementtypeiihydroxyapatitemineraltrioxideaggregateandbiodentineaninvitrostudy
AT kakkarashish comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthoffurcationperforationrepairmaterialsglassionomercementtypeiihydroxyapatitemineraltrioxideaggregateandbiodentineaninvitrostudy
AT ahujalovejeet comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthoffurcationperforationrepairmaterialsglassionomercementtypeiihydroxyapatitemineraltrioxideaggregateandbiodentineaninvitrostudy