Cargando…

Evaluation of the reproducibility of various abutments using a blue light model scanner

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of scan-based abutments using a blue light model scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A wax cast abutment die was fabricated, and a silicone impression was prepared using a silicone material. Nine study dies were constructed using the prepared duplicable silicone,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Dong-Yeon, Lee, Kyung-Eun, Jeon, Jin-Hun, Kim, Ji-Hwan, Kim, Woong-Chul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30140401
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.4.328
_version_ 1783349500502343680
author Kim, Dong-Yeon
Lee, Kyung-Eun
Jeon, Jin-Hun
Kim, Ji-Hwan
Kim, Woong-Chul
author_facet Kim, Dong-Yeon
Lee, Kyung-Eun
Jeon, Jin-Hun
Kim, Ji-Hwan
Kim, Woong-Chul
author_sort Kim, Dong-Yeon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of scan-based abutments using a blue light model scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A wax cast abutment die was fabricated, and a silicone impression was prepared using a silicone material. Nine study dies were constructed using the prepared duplicable silicone, and the first was used as a reference. These dies were classified into three groups and scanned using a blue light model scanner. The first three-dimensional (3D) data set was obtained by scanning eight dies separately in the first group. The second 3D data set was acquired when four dies were placed together in the scanner and scanned twice in the second group. Finally, the third 3D data set was obtained when eight dies were placed together in the scanner and scanned once. These data were then used to define the data value using third-dimension software. All the data were then analyzed using the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis H test (α=.05) and the post-hoc Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni's correction (α=.017). RESULTS: The means and standard deviations of the eight dies together were larger than those of the four dies together and of the individual die. Moreover, significant differences were observed among the three groups (P<.05). CONCLUSION: With larger numbers of abutments scanned together, the scan becomes more inaccurate and loses reproducibility. Therefore, scans of smaller numbers of abutments are recommended to ensure better results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6104497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61044972018-08-23 Evaluation of the reproducibility of various abutments using a blue light model scanner Kim, Dong-Yeon Lee, Kyung-Eun Jeon, Jin-Hun Kim, Ji-Hwan Kim, Woong-Chul J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of scan-based abutments using a blue light model scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A wax cast abutment die was fabricated, and a silicone impression was prepared using a silicone material. Nine study dies were constructed using the prepared duplicable silicone, and the first was used as a reference. These dies were classified into three groups and scanned using a blue light model scanner. The first three-dimensional (3D) data set was obtained by scanning eight dies separately in the first group. The second 3D data set was acquired when four dies were placed together in the scanner and scanned twice in the second group. Finally, the third 3D data set was obtained when eight dies were placed together in the scanner and scanned once. These data were then used to define the data value using third-dimension software. All the data were then analyzed using the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis H test (α=.05) and the post-hoc Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni's correction (α=.017). RESULTS: The means and standard deviations of the eight dies together were larger than those of the four dies together and of the individual die. Moreover, significant differences were observed among the three groups (P<.05). CONCLUSION: With larger numbers of abutments scanned together, the scan becomes more inaccurate and loses reproducibility. Therefore, scans of smaller numbers of abutments are recommended to ensure better results. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2018-08 2018-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6104497/ /pubmed/30140401 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.4.328 Text en © 2018 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Dong-Yeon
Lee, Kyung-Eun
Jeon, Jin-Hun
Kim, Ji-Hwan
Kim, Woong-Chul
Evaluation of the reproducibility of various abutments using a blue light model scanner
title Evaluation of the reproducibility of various abutments using a blue light model scanner
title_full Evaluation of the reproducibility of various abutments using a blue light model scanner
title_fullStr Evaluation of the reproducibility of various abutments using a blue light model scanner
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the reproducibility of various abutments using a blue light model scanner
title_short Evaluation of the reproducibility of various abutments using a blue light model scanner
title_sort evaluation of the reproducibility of various abutments using a blue light model scanner
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30140401
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.4.328
work_keys_str_mv AT kimdongyeon evaluationofthereproducibilityofvariousabutmentsusingabluelightmodelscanner
AT leekyungeun evaluationofthereproducibilityofvariousabutmentsusingabluelightmodelscanner
AT jeonjinhun evaluationofthereproducibilityofvariousabutmentsusingabluelightmodelscanner
AT kimjihwan evaluationofthereproducibilityofvariousabutmentsusingabluelightmodelscanner
AT kimwoongchul evaluationofthereproducibilityofvariousabutmentsusingabluelightmodelscanner