Cargando…
Accuracy of new implant impression technique using dual arch tray and bite impression coping
PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of a new implant impression technique using bite impression coping and a dual arch tray. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two implant fixtures were placed on maxillary left second premolar and first molar area in dentoform model. The mod...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30140392 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.4.265 |
_version_ | 1783349502130782208 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Shin-Eon Yang, Sung-Eun Lee, Cheol-Won Lee, Won-Sup Lee, Su Young |
author_facet | Lee, Shin-Eon Yang, Sung-Eun Lee, Cheol-Won Lee, Won-Sup Lee, Su Young |
author_sort | Lee, Shin-Eon |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of a new implant impression technique using bite impression coping and a dual arch tray. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two implant fixtures were placed on maxillary left second premolar and first molar area in dentoform model. The model with two fixtures was used as the reference. The impression was divided into 2 groups, n=10 each. In group 1, heavy/light body silicone impression was made with pick up impression copings and open tray. In group 2, putty/light body silicone impression was made with bite impression copings and dual arch tray. The reference model and the master casts with implant scan bodies were scanned by a laboratory scanner. Surface tessellation language (STL) datasets from test groups was superimposed with STL dataset of reference model using inspection software. The three-dimensional deviation between the reference model and impression models was calculated and illustrated as a color-map. Data was analyzed by independent samples T-test of variance at α=.05. RESULTS: The mean 3D implant deviations of pick up impression group (group 1) and dual arch impression group (group 2) were 0.029 mm and 0.034 mm, respectively. The difference in 3D deviations between groups 1 and 2 was not statistically significant (P=.075). CONCLUSION: Within limitations of this study, the accuracy of implant impression using a bite impression coping and dual arch tray is comparable to that of conventional pick-up impression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6104504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61045042018-08-23 Accuracy of new implant impression technique using dual arch tray and bite impression coping Lee, Shin-Eon Yang, Sung-Eun Lee, Cheol-Won Lee, Won-Sup Lee, Su Young J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of a new implant impression technique using bite impression coping and a dual arch tray. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two implant fixtures were placed on maxillary left second premolar and first molar area in dentoform model. The model with two fixtures was used as the reference. The impression was divided into 2 groups, n=10 each. In group 1, heavy/light body silicone impression was made with pick up impression copings and open tray. In group 2, putty/light body silicone impression was made with bite impression copings and dual arch tray. The reference model and the master casts with implant scan bodies were scanned by a laboratory scanner. Surface tessellation language (STL) datasets from test groups was superimposed with STL dataset of reference model using inspection software. The three-dimensional deviation between the reference model and impression models was calculated and illustrated as a color-map. Data was analyzed by independent samples T-test of variance at α=.05. RESULTS: The mean 3D implant deviations of pick up impression group (group 1) and dual arch impression group (group 2) were 0.029 mm and 0.034 mm, respectively. The difference in 3D deviations between groups 1 and 2 was not statistically significant (P=.075). CONCLUSION: Within limitations of this study, the accuracy of implant impression using a bite impression coping and dual arch tray is comparable to that of conventional pick-up impression. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2018-08 2018-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6104504/ /pubmed/30140392 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.4.265 Text en © 2018 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Shin-Eon Yang, Sung-Eun Lee, Cheol-Won Lee, Won-Sup Lee, Su Young Accuracy of new implant impression technique using dual arch tray and bite impression coping |
title | Accuracy of new implant impression technique using dual arch tray and bite impression coping |
title_full | Accuracy of new implant impression technique using dual arch tray and bite impression coping |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of new implant impression technique using dual arch tray and bite impression coping |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of new implant impression technique using dual arch tray and bite impression coping |
title_short | Accuracy of new implant impression technique using dual arch tray and bite impression coping |
title_sort | accuracy of new implant impression technique using dual arch tray and bite impression coping |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30140392 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.4.265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeshineon accuracyofnewimplantimpressiontechniqueusingdualarchtrayandbiteimpressioncoping AT yangsungeun accuracyofnewimplantimpressiontechniqueusingdualarchtrayandbiteimpressioncoping AT leecheolwon accuracyofnewimplantimpressiontechniqueusingdualarchtrayandbiteimpressioncoping AT leewonsup accuracyofnewimplantimpressiontechniqueusingdualarchtrayandbiteimpressioncoping AT leesuyoung accuracyofnewimplantimpressiontechniqueusingdualarchtrayandbiteimpressioncoping |