Cargando…

Audiovisual aids in primary healthcare settings’ waiting rooms. A systematic review

Background: Health promotion is part of GPs' commitments. Some waiting rooms have therefore been implemented with audiovisual aids (posters, pamphlets or screens) for health promotion purposes. Few studies have assessed the effect of audiovisual aids in primary care. Objectives: To identify, de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berkhout, Christophe, Zgorska-Meynard-Moussa, Suzanna, Willefert-Bouche, Amy, Favre, Jonathan, Peremans, Lieve, Van Royen, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30132369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1491964
_version_ 1783349522939772928
author Berkhout, Christophe
Zgorska-Meynard-Moussa, Suzanna
Willefert-Bouche, Amy
Favre, Jonathan
Peremans, Lieve
Van Royen, Paul
author_facet Berkhout, Christophe
Zgorska-Meynard-Moussa, Suzanna
Willefert-Bouche, Amy
Favre, Jonathan
Peremans, Lieve
Van Royen, Paul
author_sort Berkhout, Christophe
collection PubMed
description Background: Health promotion is part of GPs' commitments. Some waiting rooms have therefore been implemented with audiovisual aids (posters, pamphlets or screens) for health promotion purposes. Few studies have assessed the effect of audiovisual aids in primary care. Objectives: To identify, describe and appraise studies that have investigated the effects of audiovisual aids on health promotion in primary healthcare waiting rooms. To determine which factors influence this impact through literature review. Methods: Systematic review. Two independent researchers using predefined keywords searched databases. Additional publications were extracted from the reference lists of the selected articles. The selection of the articles was performed on the title and abstract, followed by complete reading and assessment. Bias and level of evidence were analysed. Results: A total of 909 articles were collected. Most of them were not in primary care settings. Fourteen peer-reviewed articles fully meeting inclusion criteria were included and analysed. Good quality studies were scarce. Eight of these articles using videos or slideshows on TV screens or tablets indicated effects: three of them were significant on patient knowledge with acceptable evidence and three on health behaviour on surrogate endpoints. Audiovisual aids seem to be used or noticed by patients and can induce conversations with physicians. The relevant factors that might influence these effects (duration of exposure, conception quality, theme, target population and time spent in the waiting room) are insufficiently investigated. Conclusion: Audiovisual aids broadcasting messages using screens (TVs, computers, tablets, and smartphones with Bluetooth(®) pairing) probably enhance patients’ knowledge. A change in health behaviour remains controversial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6104610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61046102018-08-27 Audiovisual aids in primary healthcare settings’ waiting rooms. A systematic review Berkhout, Christophe Zgorska-Meynard-Moussa, Suzanna Willefert-Bouche, Amy Favre, Jonathan Peremans, Lieve Van Royen, Paul Eur J Gen Pract Systematic Review Background: Health promotion is part of GPs' commitments. Some waiting rooms have therefore been implemented with audiovisual aids (posters, pamphlets or screens) for health promotion purposes. Few studies have assessed the effect of audiovisual aids in primary care. Objectives: To identify, describe and appraise studies that have investigated the effects of audiovisual aids on health promotion in primary healthcare waiting rooms. To determine which factors influence this impact through literature review. Methods: Systematic review. Two independent researchers using predefined keywords searched databases. Additional publications were extracted from the reference lists of the selected articles. The selection of the articles was performed on the title and abstract, followed by complete reading and assessment. Bias and level of evidence were analysed. Results: A total of 909 articles were collected. Most of them were not in primary care settings. Fourteen peer-reviewed articles fully meeting inclusion criteria were included and analysed. Good quality studies were scarce. Eight of these articles using videos or slideshows on TV screens or tablets indicated effects: three of them were significant on patient knowledge with acceptable evidence and three on health behaviour on surrogate endpoints. Audiovisual aids seem to be used or noticed by patients and can induce conversations with physicians. The relevant factors that might influence these effects (duration of exposure, conception quality, theme, target population and time spent in the waiting room) are insufficiently investigated. Conclusion: Audiovisual aids broadcasting messages using screens (TVs, computers, tablets, and smartphones with Bluetooth(®) pairing) probably enhance patients’ knowledge. A change in health behaviour remains controversial. Taylor & Francis 2018-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6104610/ /pubmed/30132369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1491964 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Berkhout, Christophe
Zgorska-Meynard-Moussa, Suzanna
Willefert-Bouche, Amy
Favre, Jonathan
Peremans, Lieve
Van Royen, Paul
Audiovisual aids in primary healthcare settings’ waiting rooms. A systematic review
title Audiovisual aids in primary healthcare settings’ waiting rooms. A systematic review
title_full Audiovisual aids in primary healthcare settings’ waiting rooms. A systematic review
title_fullStr Audiovisual aids in primary healthcare settings’ waiting rooms. A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Audiovisual aids in primary healthcare settings’ waiting rooms. A systematic review
title_short Audiovisual aids in primary healthcare settings’ waiting rooms. A systematic review
title_sort audiovisual aids in primary healthcare settings’ waiting rooms. a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30132369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1491964
work_keys_str_mv AT berkhoutchristophe audiovisualaidsinprimaryhealthcaresettingswaitingroomsasystematicreview
AT zgorskameynardmoussasuzanna audiovisualaidsinprimaryhealthcaresettingswaitingroomsasystematicreview
AT willefertboucheamy audiovisualaidsinprimaryhealthcaresettingswaitingroomsasystematicreview
AT favrejonathan audiovisualaidsinprimaryhealthcaresettingswaitingroomsasystematicreview
AT peremanslieve audiovisualaidsinprimaryhealthcaresettingswaitingroomsasystematicreview
AT vanroyenpaul audiovisualaidsinprimaryhealthcaresettingswaitingroomsasystematicreview