Cargando…

Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention in Police Custody Suites: Pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (AcCePT)

AIMS: There is a clear association between alcohol use and offending behaviour and significant police time is spent on alcohol-related incidents. This study aimed to test the feasibility of a trial of screening and brief intervention in police custody suites to reduce heavy drinking and re-offending...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Addison, Michelle, Mcgovern, Ruth, Angus, Colin, Becker, Frauke, Brennan, Alan, Brown, Heather, Coulton, Simon, Crowe, Lisa, Gilvarry, Eilish, Hickman, Matthew, Howel, Denise, Mccoll, Elaine, Muirhead, Colin, Newbury-Birch, Dorothy, Waqas, Muhammad, Kaner, Eileen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29889245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agy039
_version_ 1783349525031682048
author Addison, Michelle
Mcgovern, Ruth
Angus, Colin
Becker, Frauke
Brennan, Alan
Brown, Heather
Coulton, Simon
Crowe, Lisa
Gilvarry, Eilish
Hickman, Matthew
Howel, Denise
Mccoll, Elaine
Muirhead, Colin
Newbury-Birch, Dorothy
Waqas, Muhammad
Kaner, Eileen
author_facet Addison, Michelle
Mcgovern, Ruth
Angus, Colin
Becker, Frauke
Brennan, Alan
Brown, Heather
Coulton, Simon
Crowe, Lisa
Gilvarry, Eilish
Hickman, Matthew
Howel, Denise
Mccoll, Elaine
Muirhead, Colin
Newbury-Birch, Dorothy
Waqas, Muhammad
Kaner, Eileen
author_sort Addison, Michelle
collection PubMed
description AIMS: There is a clear association between alcohol use and offending behaviour and significant police time is spent on alcohol-related incidents. This study aimed to test the feasibility of a trial of screening and brief intervention in police custody suites to reduce heavy drinking and re-offending behaviour. SHORT SUMMARY: We achieved target recruitment and high brief intervention delivery if this occurred immediately after screening. Low rates of return for counselling and retention at follow-up were challenges for a definitive trial. Conversely, high consent rates for access to police data suggested at least some outcomes could be measured remotely. METHODS: A three-armed pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial with an embedded qualitative interview-based process evaluation to explore acceptability issues in six police custody suites (north east and south west of the UK). Interventions included: 1. Screening only (Controls), 2. 10 min Brief Advice 3. Brief Advice plus 20 min of brief Counselling. RESULTS: Of 3330 arrestees approached: 2228 were eligible for screening (67%) and 720 consented (32%); 386 (54%) scored 8+ on AUDIT; and 205 (53%) were enroled (79 controls, 65 brief advice and 61 brief counselling). Follow-up rates at 6 and 12 months were 29% and 26%, respectively. However, routinely collected re-offending data were obtained for 193 (94%) participants. Indices of deprivation data were calculated for 184 (90%) participants; 37.6% of these resided in the 20% most deprived areas of UK. Qualitative data showed that all arrestees reported awareness that participation was voluntary, that the trial was separate from police work, and the majority said trial procedures were acceptable. CONCLUSION: Despite hitting target recruitment and same-day brief intervention delivery, a future trial of alcohol screening and brief intervention in a police custody setting would only be feasible if routinely collected re-offending and health data were used for outcome measurement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN number: 89291046.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6104624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61046242018-08-27 Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention in Police Custody Suites: Pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (AcCePT) Addison, Michelle Mcgovern, Ruth Angus, Colin Becker, Frauke Brennan, Alan Brown, Heather Coulton, Simon Crowe, Lisa Gilvarry, Eilish Hickman, Matthew Howel, Denise Mccoll, Elaine Muirhead, Colin Newbury-Birch, Dorothy Waqas, Muhammad Kaner, Eileen Alcohol Alcohol Original Manuscript AIMS: There is a clear association between alcohol use and offending behaviour and significant police time is spent on alcohol-related incidents. This study aimed to test the feasibility of a trial of screening and brief intervention in police custody suites to reduce heavy drinking and re-offending behaviour. SHORT SUMMARY: We achieved target recruitment and high brief intervention delivery if this occurred immediately after screening. Low rates of return for counselling and retention at follow-up were challenges for a definitive trial. Conversely, high consent rates for access to police data suggested at least some outcomes could be measured remotely. METHODS: A three-armed pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial with an embedded qualitative interview-based process evaluation to explore acceptability issues in six police custody suites (north east and south west of the UK). Interventions included: 1. Screening only (Controls), 2. 10 min Brief Advice 3. Brief Advice plus 20 min of brief Counselling. RESULTS: Of 3330 arrestees approached: 2228 were eligible for screening (67%) and 720 consented (32%); 386 (54%) scored 8+ on AUDIT; and 205 (53%) were enroled (79 controls, 65 brief advice and 61 brief counselling). Follow-up rates at 6 and 12 months were 29% and 26%, respectively. However, routinely collected re-offending data were obtained for 193 (94%) participants. Indices of deprivation data were calculated for 184 (90%) participants; 37.6% of these resided in the 20% most deprived areas of UK. Qualitative data showed that all arrestees reported awareness that participation was voluntary, that the trial was separate from police work, and the majority said trial procedures were acceptable. CONCLUSION: Despite hitting target recruitment and same-day brief intervention delivery, a future trial of alcohol screening and brief intervention in a police custody setting would only be feasible if routinely collected re-offending and health data were used for outcome measurement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN number: 89291046. Oxford University Press 2018-09 2018-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6104624/ /pubmed/29889245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agy039 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Medical Council on Alcohol and Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Manuscript
Addison, Michelle
Mcgovern, Ruth
Angus, Colin
Becker, Frauke
Brennan, Alan
Brown, Heather
Coulton, Simon
Crowe, Lisa
Gilvarry, Eilish
Hickman, Matthew
Howel, Denise
Mccoll, Elaine
Muirhead, Colin
Newbury-Birch, Dorothy
Waqas, Muhammad
Kaner, Eileen
Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention in Police Custody Suites: Pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (AcCePT)
title Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention in Police Custody Suites: Pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (AcCePT)
title_full Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention in Police Custody Suites: Pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (AcCePT)
title_fullStr Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention in Police Custody Suites: Pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (AcCePT)
title_full_unstemmed Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention in Police Custody Suites: Pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (AcCePT)
title_short Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention in Police Custody Suites: Pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (AcCePT)
title_sort alcohol screening and brief intervention in police custody suites: pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (accept)
topic Original Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29889245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agy039
work_keys_str_mv AT addisonmichelle alcoholscreeningandbriefinterventioninpolicecustodysuitespilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaccept
AT mcgovernruth alcoholscreeningandbriefinterventioninpolicecustodysuitespilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaccept
AT anguscolin alcoholscreeningandbriefinterventioninpolicecustodysuitespilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaccept
AT beckerfrauke alcoholscreeningandbriefinterventioninpolicecustodysuitespilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaccept
AT brennanalan alcoholscreeningandbriefinterventioninpolicecustodysuitespilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaccept
AT brownheather alcoholscreeningandbriefinterventioninpolicecustodysuitespilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaccept
AT coultonsimon alcoholscreeningandbriefinterventioninpolicecustodysuitespilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaccept
AT crowelisa alcoholscreeningandbriefinterventioninpolicecustodysuitespilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaccept
AT gilvarryeilish alcoholscreeningandbriefinterventioninpolicecustodysuitespilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaccept
AT hickmanmatthew alcoholscreeningandbriefinterventioninpolicecustodysuitespilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaccept
AT howeldenise alcoholscreeningandbriefinterventioninpolicecustodysuitespilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaccept
AT mccollelaine alcoholscreeningandbriefinterventioninpolicecustodysuitespilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaccept
AT muirheadcolin alcoholscreeningandbriefinterventioninpolicecustodysuitespilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaccept
AT newburybirchdorothy alcoholscreeningandbriefinterventioninpolicecustodysuitespilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaccept
AT waqasmuhammad alcoholscreeningandbriefinterventioninpolicecustodysuitespilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaccept
AT kanereileen alcoholscreeningandbriefinterventioninpolicecustodysuitespilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaccept