Cargando…

‘Adding another spinning plate to an already busy life’. Benefits and risks in patient partner–researcher relationships: a qualitative study of patient partners’ experiences in a Canadian health research setting

OBJECTIVE: To better understand, based on patient partners’ experiences, benefits and risks in patient partner–researcher relationships in a health research setting. DESIGN: Qualitative interviews with thematic analysis informed by a relational ethics lens. SETTING: A multidisciplinary health resear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leese, Jenny, Macdonald, Graham, Kerr, Sheila, Gulka, Lianne, Hoens, Alison M, Lum, Wendy, Tran, Bao Chau, Townsend, Anne F, Li, Linda C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30121606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022154
_version_ 1783349547741741056
author Leese, Jenny
Macdonald, Graham
Kerr, Sheila
Gulka, Lianne
Hoens, Alison M
Lum, Wendy
Tran, Bao Chau
Townsend, Anne F
Li, Linda C
author_facet Leese, Jenny
Macdonald, Graham
Kerr, Sheila
Gulka, Lianne
Hoens, Alison M
Lum, Wendy
Tran, Bao Chau
Townsend, Anne F
Li, Linda C
author_sort Leese, Jenny
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To better understand, based on patient partners’ experiences, benefits and risks in patient partner–researcher relationships in a health research setting. DESIGN: Qualitative interviews with thematic analysis informed by a relational ethics lens. SETTING: A multidisciplinary health research centre in Vancouver, Canada. This study was codeveloped by patient partners and researchers at the centre. PARTICIPANTS: 22 people living with arthritis, with experience as members of a patient advisory board at the research centre from 1 month to 10 years. RESULTS: We identified three main themes: (1) Being Heard: Participants had experienced uncomfortable emotions (eg, feelings of insecurity) in their relationships with researchers. The discomfort, however, was minimised by the demonstration of mutual respect in their interactions. Specifically, participants valued environments without a hierarchy between patient partners and researchers, where contributions of each party were considered equally important, and where patients’ voices were heard; (2) Cobuilding social relations: Participants valued building social relations with researchers beyond their expected interactions as partners in research and (3) Adding another spinning plate to an already busy life: Participants valued relationships with researchers who had cocreated environments that minimised the risks of physical and emotional impacts (eg, fatigue, stress, guilt) on them while juggling multiple obligations, priorities and their health. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide valuable insights to guide relationship building between patient partners and researchers. Informed by a relational ethics lens, these findings are a critical step in supporting an ethically sound practice of patient engagement in research that prioritises patients’ perspectives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6104752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61047522018-08-24 ‘Adding another spinning plate to an already busy life’. Benefits and risks in patient partner–researcher relationships: a qualitative study of patient partners’ experiences in a Canadian health research setting Leese, Jenny Macdonald, Graham Kerr, Sheila Gulka, Lianne Hoens, Alison M Lum, Wendy Tran, Bao Chau Townsend, Anne F Li, Linda C BMJ Open Ethics OBJECTIVE: To better understand, based on patient partners’ experiences, benefits and risks in patient partner–researcher relationships in a health research setting. DESIGN: Qualitative interviews with thematic analysis informed by a relational ethics lens. SETTING: A multidisciplinary health research centre in Vancouver, Canada. This study was codeveloped by patient partners and researchers at the centre. PARTICIPANTS: 22 people living with arthritis, with experience as members of a patient advisory board at the research centre from 1 month to 10 years. RESULTS: We identified three main themes: (1) Being Heard: Participants had experienced uncomfortable emotions (eg, feelings of insecurity) in their relationships with researchers. The discomfort, however, was minimised by the demonstration of mutual respect in their interactions. Specifically, participants valued environments without a hierarchy between patient partners and researchers, where contributions of each party were considered equally important, and where patients’ voices were heard; (2) Cobuilding social relations: Participants valued building social relations with researchers beyond their expected interactions as partners in research and (3) Adding another spinning plate to an already busy life: Participants valued relationships with researchers who had cocreated environments that minimised the risks of physical and emotional impacts (eg, fatigue, stress, guilt) on them while juggling multiple obligations, priorities and their health. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide valuable insights to guide relationship building between patient partners and researchers. Informed by a relational ethics lens, these findings are a critical step in supporting an ethically sound practice of patient engagement in research that prioritises patients’ perspectives. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6104752/ /pubmed/30121606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022154 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Ethics
Leese, Jenny
Macdonald, Graham
Kerr, Sheila
Gulka, Lianne
Hoens, Alison M
Lum, Wendy
Tran, Bao Chau
Townsend, Anne F
Li, Linda C
‘Adding another spinning plate to an already busy life’. Benefits and risks in patient partner–researcher relationships: a qualitative study of patient partners’ experiences in a Canadian health research setting
title ‘Adding another spinning plate to an already busy life’. Benefits and risks in patient partner–researcher relationships: a qualitative study of patient partners’ experiences in a Canadian health research setting
title_full ‘Adding another spinning plate to an already busy life’. Benefits and risks in patient partner–researcher relationships: a qualitative study of patient partners’ experiences in a Canadian health research setting
title_fullStr ‘Adding another spinning plate to an already busy life’. Benefits and risks in patient partner–researcher relationships: a qualitative study of patient partners’ experiences in a Canadian health research setting
title_full_unstemmed ‘Adding another spinning plate to an already busy life’. Benefits and risks in patient partner–researcher relationships: a qualitative study of patient partners’ experiences in a Canadian health research setting
title_short ‘Adding another spinning plate to an already busy life’. Benefits and risks in patient partner–researcher relationships: a qualitative study of patient partners’ experiences in a Canadian health research setting
title_sort ‘adding another spinning plate to an already busy life’. benefits and risks in patient partner–researcher relationships: a qualitative study of patient partners’ experiences in a canadian health research setting
topic Ethics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30121606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022154
work_keys_str_mv AT leesejenny addinganotherspinningplatetoanalreadybusylifebenefitsandrisksinpatientpartnerresearcherrelationshipsaqualitativestudyofpatientpartnersexperiencesinacanadianhealthresearchsetting
AT macdonaldgraham addinganotherspinningplatetoanalreadybusylifebenefitsandrisksinpatientpartnerresearcherrelationshipsaqualitativestudyofpatientpartnersexperiencesinacanadianhealthresearchsetting
AT kerrsheila addinganotherspinningplatetoanalreadybusylifebenefitsandrisksinpatientpartnerresearcherrelationshipsaqualitativestudyofpatientpartnersexperiencesinacanadianhealthresearchsetting
AT gulkalianne addinganotherspinningplatetoanalreadybusylifebenefitsandrisksinpatientpartnerresearcherrelationshipsaqualitativestudyofpatientpartnersexperiencesinacanadianhealthresearchsetting
AT hoensalisonm addinganotherspinningplatetoanalreadybusylifebenefitsandrisksinpatientpartnerresearcherrelationshipsaqualitativestudyofpatientpartnersexperiencesinacanadianhealthresearchsetting
AT lumwendy addinganotherspinningplatetoanalreadybusylifebenefitsandrisksinpatientpartnerresearcherrelationshipsaqualitativestudyofpatientpartnersexperiencesinacanadianhealthresearchsetting
AT tranbaochau addinganotherspinningplatetoanalreadybusylifebenefitsandrisksinpatientpartnerresearcherrelationshipsaqualitativestudyofpatientpartnersexperiencesinacanadianhealthresearchsetting
AT townsendannef addinganotherspinningplatetoanalreadybusylifebenefitsandrisksinpatientpartnerresearcherrelationshipsaqualitativestudyofpatientpartnersexperiencesinacanadianhealthresearchsetting
AT lilindac addinganotherspinningplatetoanalreadybusylifebenefitsandrisksinpatientpartnerresearcherrelationshipsaqualitativestudyofpatientpartnersexperiencesinacanadianhealthresearchsetting