Cargando…

Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? A randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: No intervention has been shown to prevent falls poststroke. We aimed to determine if perturbation-based balance training (PBT) can reduce falls in daily life among individuals with chronic stroke. DESIGN: Assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Two academic hospitals in an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mansfield, Avril, Aqui, Anthony, Danells, Cynthia J, Knorr, Svetlana, Centen, Andrew, DePaul, Vincent G, Schinkel-Ivy, Alison, Brooks, Dina, Inness, Elizabeth L, Mochizuki, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30121600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021510
_version_ 1783349549235961856
author Mansfield, Avril
Aqui, Anthony
Danells, Cynthia J
Knorr, Svetlana
Centen, Andrew
DePaul, Vincent G
Schinkel-Ivy, Alison
Brooks, Dina
Inness, Elizabeth L
Mochizuki, George
author_facet Mansfield, Avril
Aqui, Anthony
Danells, Cynthia J
Knorr, Svetlana
Centen, Andrew
DePaul, Vincent G
Schinkel-Ivy, Alison
Brooks, Dina
Inness, Elizabeth L
Mochizuki, George
author_sort Mansfield, Avril
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: No intervention has been shown to prevent falls poststroke. We aimed to determine if perturbation-based balance training (PBT) can reduce falls in daily life among individuals with chronic stroke. DESIGN: Assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Two academic hospitals in an urban area. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were allocated using stratified blocked randomisation to either ‘traditional’ balance training (control) or PBT. PBT focused on improving responses to instability, whereas traditional balance training focused on maintaining stability during functional tasks. Training sessions were 1 hour twice/week for 6 weeks. Participants were also invited to complete 2 ‘booster’ training sessions during the follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-eight participants with chronic stroke (>6 months poststroke) were recruited and randomly allocated one of the two interventions. Five participants withdrew; 42 (control) and 41 (PBT group) were included in the analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was rate of falls in the 12 months post-training. Negative binomial regression was used to compare fall rates between groups. Secondary outcomes were measures of balance, mobility, balance confidence, physical activity and social integration. RESULTS: PBT participants reported 53 falls (1.45 falls/person-year) and control participants reported 64 falls (1.72 falls/person-year; rate ratio: 0.85(0.42 to 1.69); p=0.63). Per-protocol analysis included 32 PBT and 34 control participants who completed at least 10/12 initial training sessions and 1 booster session. Within this subset, PBT participants reported 32 falls (1.07 falls/person-year) and control participants reported 57 falls (1.75 falls/person-year; rate ratio: 0.62(0.29 to 1.30); p=0.20). PBT participants had greater improvement in reactive balance control than the control group, and these improvements were sustained 12 months post-training. There were no intervention-related serious adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: The results are inconclusive. PBT may help to prevent falls in daily life poststroke, but ongoing training may be required to maintain the benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN05434601; Results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6104758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61047582018-08-24 Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? A randomised controlled trial Mansfield, Avril Aqui, Anthony Danells, Cynthia J Knorr, Svetlana Centen, Andrew DePaul, Vincent G Schinkel-Ivy, Alison Brooks, Dina Inness, Elizabeth L Mochizuki, George BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVES: No intervention has been shown to prevent falls poststroke. We aimed to determine if perturbation-based balance training (PBT) can reduce falls in daily life among individuals with chronic stroke. DESIGN: Assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Two academic hospitals in an urban area. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were allocated using stratified blocked randomisation to either ‘traditional’ balance training (control) or PBT. PBT focused on improving responses to instability, whereas traditional balance training focused on maintaining stability during functional tasks. Training sessions were 1 hour twice/week for 6 weeks. Participants were also invited to complete 2 ‘booster’ training sessions during the follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-eight participants with chronic stroke (>6 months poststroke) were recruited and randomly allocated one of the two interventions. Five participants withdrew; 42 (control) and 41 (PBT group) were included in the analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was rate of falls in the 12 months post-training. Negative binomial regression was used to compare fall rates between groups. Secondary outcomes were measures of balance, mobility, balance confidence, physical activity and social integration. RESULTS: PBT participants reported 53 falls (1.45 falls/person-year) and control participants reported 64 falls (1.72 falls/person-year; rate ratio: 0.85(0.42 to 1.69); p=0.63). Per-protocol analysis included 32 PBT and 34 control participants who completed at least 10/12 initial training sessions and 1 booster session. Within this subset, PBT participants reported 32 falls (1.07 falls/person-year) and control participants reported 57 falls (1.75 falls/person-year; rate ratio: 0.62(0.29 to 1.30); p=0.20). PBT participants had greater improvement in reactive balance control than the control group, and these improvements were sustained 12 months post-training. There were no intervention-related serious adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: The results are inconclusive. PBT may help to prevent falls in daily life poststroke, but ongoing training may be required to maintain the benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN05434601; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6104758/ /pubmed/30121600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021510 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Mansfield, Avril
Aqui, Anthony
Danells, Cynthia J
Knorr, Svetlana
Centen, Andrew
DePaul, Vincent G
Schinkel-Ivy, Alison
Brooks, Dina
Inness, Elizabeth L
Mochizuki, George
Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? A randomised controlled trial
title Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? A randomised controlled trial
title_full Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? A randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? A randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? A randomised controlled trial
title_short Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? A randomised controlled trial
title_sort does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? a randomised controlled trial
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30121600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021510
work_keys_str_mv AT mansfieldavril doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT aquianthony doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT danellscynthiaj doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT knorrsvetlana doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT centenandrew doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT depaulvincentg doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schinkelivyalison doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brooksdina doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT innesselizabethl doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mochizukigeorge doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial