Cargando…
Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? A randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVES: No intervention has been shown to prevent falls poststroke. We aimed to determine if perturbation-based balance training (PBT) can reduce falls in daily life among individuals with chronic stroke. DESIGN: Assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Two academic hospitals in an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30121600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021510 |
_version_ | 1783349549235961856 |
---|---|
author | Mansfield, Avril Aqui, Anthony Danells, Cynthia J Knorr, Svetlana Centen, Andrew DePaul, Vincent G Schinkel-Ivy, Alison Brooks, Dina Inness, Elizabeth L Mochizuki, George |
author_facet | Mansfield, Avril Aqui, Anthony Danells, Cynthia J Knorr, Svetlana Centen, Andrew DePaul, Vincent G Schinkel-Ivy, Alison Brooks, Dina Inness, Elizabeth L Mochizuki, George |
author_sort | Mansfield, Avril |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: No intervention has been shown to prevent falls poststroke. We aimed to determine if perturbation-based balance training (PBT) can reduce falls in daily life among individuals with chronic stroke. DESIGN: Assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Two academic hospitals in an urban area. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were allocated using stratified blocked randomisation to either ‘traditional’ balance training (control) or PBT. PBT focused on improving responses to instability, whereas traditional balance training focused on maintaining stability during functional tasks. Training sessions were 1 hour twice/week for 6 weeks. Participants were also invited to complete 2 ‘booster’ training sessions during the follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-eight participants with chronic stroke (>6 months poststroke) were recruited and randomly allocated one of the two interventions. Five participants withdrew; 42 (control) and 41 (PBT group) were included in the analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was rate of falls in the 12 months post-training. Negative binomial regression was used to compare fall rates between groups. Secondary outcomes were measures of balance, mobility, balance confidence, physical activity and social integration. RESULTS: PBT participants reported 53 falls (1.45 falls/person-year) and control participants reported 64 falls (1.72 falls/person-year; rate ratio: 0.85(0.42 to 1.69); p=0.63). Per-protocol analysis included 32 PBT and 34 control participants who completed at least 10/12 initial training sessions and 1 booster session. Within this subset, PBT participants reported 32 falls (1.07 falls/person-year) and control participants reported 57 falls (1.75 falls/person-year; rate ratio: 0.62(0.29 to 1.30); p=0.20). PBT participants had greater improvement in reactive balance control than the control group, and these improvements were sustained 12 months post-training. There were no intervention-related serious adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: The results are inconclusive. PBT may help to prevent falls in daily life poststroke, but ongoing training may be required to maintain the benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN05434601; Results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6104758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61047582018-08-24 Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? A randomised controlled trial Mansfield, Avril Aqui, Anthony Danells, Cynthia J Knorr, Svetlana Centen, Andrew DePaul, Vincent G Schinkel-Ivy, Alison Brooks, Dina Inness, Elizabeth L Mochizuki, George BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVES: No intervention has been shown to prevent falls poststroke. We aimed to determine if perturbation-based balance training (PBT) can reduce falls in daily life among individuals with chronic stroke. DESIGN: Assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Two academic hospitals in an urban area. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were allocated using stratified blocked randomisation to either ‘traditional’ balance training (control) or PBT. PBT focused on improving responses to instability, whereas traditional balance training focused on maintaining stability during functional tasks. Training sessions were 1 hour twice/week for 6 weeks. Participants were also invited to complete 2 ‘booster’ training sessions during the follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-eight participants with chronic stroke (>6 months poststroke) were recruited and randomly allocated one of the two interventions. Five participants withdrew; 42 (control) and 41 (PBT group) were included in the analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was rate of falls in the 12 months post-training. Negative binomial regression was used to compare fall rates between groups. Secondary outcomes were measures of balance, mobility, balance confidence, physical activity and social integration. RESULTS: PBT participants reported 53 falls (1.45 falls/person-year) and control participants reported 64 falls (1.72 falls/person-year; rate ratio: 0.85(0.42 to 1.69); p=0.63). Per-protocol analysis included 32 PBT and 34 control participants who completed at least 10/12 initial training sessions and 1 booster session. Within this subset, PBT participants reported 32 falls (1.07 falls/person-year) and control participants reported 57 falls (1.75 falls/person-year; rate ratio: 0.62(0.29 to 1.30); p=0.20). PBT participants had greater improvement in reactive balance control than the control group, and these improvements were sustained 12 months post-training. There were no intervention-related serious adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: The results are inconclusive. PBT may help to prevent falls in daily life poststroke, but ongoing training may be required to maintain the benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN05434601; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6104758/ /pubmed/30121600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021510 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Mansfield, Avril Aqui, Anthony Danells, Cynthia J Knorr, Svetlana Centen, Andrew DePaul, Vincent G Schinkel-Ivy, Alison Brooks, Dina Inness, Elizabeth L Mochizuki, George Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? A randomised controlled trial |
title | Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? A randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? A randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? A randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? A randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? A randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30121600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021510 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mansfieldavril doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT aquianthony doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT danellscynthiaj doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT knorrsvetlana doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT centenandrew doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT depaulvincentg doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT schinkelivyalison doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT brooksdina doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT innesselizabethl doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mochizukigeorge doesperturbationbasedbalancetrainingpreventfallsamongindividualswithchronicstrokearandomisedcontrolledtrial |