Cargando…

Comparative morbidities and the share of emergencies in hospital admissions in deprived areas: a method and evidence from English administrative data

OBJECTIVE: Various studies find that the share of emergencies in hospital admissions is higher in deprived areas, but both the explanation and policy implications are unclear. We estimate the extent to which this finding is due to a different disease mix in deprived areas, rather than other explanat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCormick, Barry, Hill, Peter-Sam, Redding, Stuart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30127052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022573
_version_ 1783349549702578176
author McCormick, Barry
Hill, Peter-Sam
Redding, Stuart
author_facet McCormick, Barry
Hill, Peter-Sam
Redding, Stuart
author_sort McCormick, Barry
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Various studies find that the share of emergencies in hospital admissions is higher in deprived areas, but both the explanation and policy implications are unclear. We estimate the extent to which this finding is due to a different disease mix in deprived areas, rather than other explanations such as patient behaviour and general practitioner effectiveness. DESIGN: Secondary analysis using English Hospital Episode Statistics data, with disease for elective and emergency admissions in 2008/2009 coded at 186 blocks or 1230 categories and aggregated to lower layer super output area of residence. It is then linked to an appropriate measure of deprivation. OUTCOME MEASURES: The difference in the share of emergencies in hospital admissions between communities in the highest and lowest deciles of deprivation; and the percentage of this difference that is explained if areas in the least deprived decile have the same disease mix as those in the most deprived decile. RESULTS: Using the finest disease classification scheme (1230 categories), 71% of the higher share of admissions that were emergencies in decile 1 areas relative to decile 10, is explained by the “adverse” case mix (CM) in deprived areas. The remainder reflects the higher relative use of emergency care in deprived areas for the same conditions. Higher incidence of respiratory and circulatory diseases in deprived areas explains about 30% of the CM contribution. Diseases of the digestive system and abdomen have a high relative use of emergency care in deprived areas. CONCLUSIONS: The higher use of emergency care in deprived areas is primarily a symptom of the higher prevalence of diseases which have high national rates of emergency to elective care—especially respiratory diseases—rather than an indication of less effective primary care. Nevertheless, there is a higher share of emergency care in admissions in deprived areas for several diseases, most notably of the digestive system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6104760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61047602018-08-24 Comparative morbidities and the share of emergencies in hospital admissions in deprived areas: a method and evidence from English administrative data McCormick, Barry Hill, Peter-Sam Redding, Stuart BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVE: Various studies find that the share of emergencies in hospital admissions is higher in deprived areas, but both the explanation and policy implications are unclear. We estimate the extent to which this finding is due to a different disease mix in deprived areas, rather than other explanations such as patient behaviour and general practitioner effectiveness. DESIGN: Secondary analysis using English Hospital Episode Statistics data, with disease for elective and emergency admissions in 2008/2009 coded at 186 blocks or 1230 categories and aggregated to lower layer super output area of residence. It is then linked to an appropriate measure of deprivation. OUTCOME MEASURES: The difference in the share of emergencies in hospital admissions between communities in the highest and lowest deciles of deprivation; and the percentage of this difference that is explained if areas in the least deprived decile have the same disease mix as those in the most deprived decile. RESULTS: Using the finest disease classification scheme (1230 categories), 71% of the higher share of admissions that were emergencies in decile 1 areas relative to decile 10, is explained by the “adverse” case mix (CM) in deprived areas. The remainder reflects the higher relative use of emergency care in deprived areas for the same conditions. Higher incidence of respiratory and circulatory diseases in deprived areas explains about 30% of the CM contribution. Diseases of the digestive system and abdomen have a high relative use of emergency care in deprived areas. CONCLUSIONS: The higher use of emergency care in deprived areas is primarily a symptom of the higher prevalence of diseases which have high national rates of emergency to elective care—especially respiratory diseases—rather than an indication of less effective primary care. Nevertheless, there is a higher share of emergency care in admissions in deprived areas for several diseases, most notably of the digestive system. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6104760/ /pubmed/30127052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022573 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Economics
McCormick, Barry
Hill, Peter-Sam
Redding, Stuart
Comparative morbidities and the share of emergencies in hospital admissions in deprived areas: a method and evidence from English administrative data
title Comparative morbidities and the share of emergencies in hospital admissions in deprived areas: a method and evidence from English administrative data
title_full Comparative morbidities and the share of emergencies in hospital admissions in deprived areas: a method and evidence from English administrative data
title_fullStr Comparative morbidities and the share of emergencies in hospital admissions in deprived areas: a method and evidence from English administrative data
title_full_unstemmed Comparative morbidities and the share of emergencies in hospital admissions in deprived areas: a method and evidence from English administrative data
title_short Comparative morbidities and the share of emergencies in hospital admissions in deprived areas: a method and evidence from English administrative data
title_sort comparative morbidities and the share of emergencies in hospital admissions in deprived areas: a method and evidence from english administrative data
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30127052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022573
work_keys_str_mv AT mccormickbarry comparativemorbiditiesandtheshareofemergenciesinhospitaladmissionsindeprivedareasamethodandevidencefromenglishadministrativedata
AT hillpetersam comparativemorbiditiesandtheshareofemergenciesinhospitaladmissionsindeprivedareasamethodandevidencefromenglishadministrativedata
AT reddingstuart comparativemorbiditiesandtheshareofemergenciesinhospitaladmissionsindeprivedareasamethodandevidencefromenglishadministrativedata