Cargando…

Influence of Nd:YAG laser on the penetration of a bioceramic root canal sealer into dentinal tubules: A confocal analysis

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study, is to evaluate the penetration of a bioceramic root canal sealer into dentinal tubules at 3 mm and 5 mm from the apex after Nd:YAG laser irradiation. METHODS: Forty freshly extracted human mandibular premolars were prepared using Reciproc(®) and irrigated w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jardim Del Monaco, Rodrigo, Tavares de Oliveira, Marcelo, de Lima, Adriano Fonseca, Scarparo Navarro, Ricardo, Zanetti, Raquel Virgínia, de Fátima Teixeira da Silva, Daniela, Horliana, Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30133509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202295
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study, is to evaluate the penetration of a bioceramic root canal sealer into dentinal tubules at 3 mm and 5 mm from the apex after Nd:YAG laser irradiation. METHODS: Forty freshly extracted human mandibular premolars were prepared using Reciproc(®) and irrigated with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Teeth were divided into 4 groups: group 1, obturated with control sealer (AH Plus(®)); group 2, obturated with bioceramic sealer (Endosequence BC Sealer(®)); group 3, Nd:YAG laser + control sealer (AH Plus(®)); and group 4, Nd:YAG laser + bioceramic sealer (Endosequence BC Sealer(®)). The samples were transversely sectioned 3 mm and 5 mm from the apex and examined using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Two parameters were measured: 1) sealer penetration into dentinal tubules of the root canal and 2) sealer penetration into the perimeter of the root canal walls. RESULTS: Penetration analysis showed that bioceramic sealer had a higher penetration at depths of 3 and 5 mm than that of the control sealer, regardless of laser use (p <0.05). Perimeter analysis showed that there was no difference between both sealers at a depth of 3 mm (p <0.05), regardless of laser use. At a depth of 5 mm, bioceramic sealer and laser showed a greater perimeter of penetration (p <0.05) than the control sealer. CONCLUSION: The use of Nd:YAG laser did not compromise the penetration of bioceramic sealer into dentinal tubules of root canals at 3 mm and 5 mm from the apex.