Cargando…

Selectivity Challenges in Docking Screens for GPCR Targets and Antitargets

[Image: see text] To investigate large library docking’s ability to find molecules with joint activity against on-targets and selectivity versus antitargets, the dopamine D(2) and serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptors were targeted, seeking selectivity against the histamine H(1) receptor. In a second campaig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weiss, Dahlia R., Karpiak, Joel, Huang, Xi-Ping, Sassano, Maria F., Lyu, Jiankun, Roth, Bryan L., Shoichet, Brian K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6105036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29990431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00718
_version_ 1783349595192950784
author Weiss, Dahlia R.
Karpiak, Joel
Huang, Xi-Ping
Sassano, Maria F.
Lyu, Jiankun
Roth, Bryan L.
Shoichet, Brian K.
author_facet Weiss, Dahlia R.
Karpiak, Joel
Huang, Xi-Ping
Sassano, Maria F.
Lyu, Jiankun
Roth, Bryan L.
Shoichet, Brian K.
author_sort Weiss, Dahlia R.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] To investigate large library docking’s ability to find molecules with joint activity against on-targets and selectivity versus antitargets, the dopamine D(2) and serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptors were targeted, seeking selectivity against the histamine H(1) receptor. In a second campaign, κ-opioid receptor ligands were sought with selectivity versus the μ-opioid receptor. While hit rates ranged from 40% to 63% against the on-targets, they were just as good against the antitargets, even though the molecules were selected for their putative lack of binding to the off-targets. Affinities, too, were often as good or better for the off-targets. Even though it was occasionally possible to find selective molecules, such as a mid-nanomolar D(2)/5-HT(2A) ligand with 21-fold selectivity versus the H(1) receptor, this was the exception. Whereas false-negatives are tolerable in docking screens against on-targets, they are intolerable against antitargets; addressing this problem may demand new strategies in the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6105036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61050362018-08-23 Selectivity Challenges in Docking Screens for GPCR Targets and Antitargets Weiss, Dahlia R. Karpiak, Joel Huang, Xi-Ping Sassano, Maria F. Lyu, Jiankun Roth, Bryan L. Shoichet, Brian K. J Med Chem [Image: see text] To investigate large library docking’s ability to find molecules with joint activity against on-targets and selectivity versus antitargets, the dopamine D(2) and serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptors were targeted, seeking selectivity against the histamine H(1) receptor. In a second campaign, κ-opioid receptor ligands were sought with selectivity versus the μ-opioid receptor. While hit rates ranged from 40% to 63% against the on-targets, they were just as good against the antitargets, even though the molecules were selected for their putative lack of binding to the off-targets. Affinities, too, were often as good or better for the off-targets. Even though it was occasionally possible to find selective molecules, such as a mid-nanomolar D(2)/5-HT(2A) ligand with 21-fold selectivity versus the H(1) receptor, this was the exception. Whereas false-negatives are tolerable in docking screens against on-targets, they are intolerable against antitargets; addressing this problem may demand new strategies in the field. American Chemical Society 2018-07-10 2018-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6105036/ /pubmed/29990431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00718 Text en Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Weiss, Dahlia R.
Karpiak, Joel
Huang, Xi-Ping
Sassano, Maria F.
Lyu, Jiankun
Roth, Bryan L.
Shoichet, Brian K.
Selectivity Challenges in Docking Screens for GPCR Targets and Antitargets
title Selectivity Challenges in Docking Screens for GPCR Targets and Antitargets
title_full Selectivity Challenges in Docking Screens for GPCR Targets and Antitargets
title_fullStr Selectivity Challenges in Docking Screens for GPCR Targets and Antitargets
title_full_unstemmed Selectivity Challenges in Docking Screens for GPCR Targets and Antitargets
title_short Selectivity Challenges in Docking Screens for GPCR Targets and Antitargets
title_sort selectivity challenges in docking screens for gpcr targets and antitargets
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6105036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29990431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00718
work_keys_str_mv AT weissdahliar selectivitychallengesindockingscreensforgpcrtargetsandantitargets
AT karpiakjoel selectivitychallengesindockingscreensforgpcrtargetsandantitargets
AT huangxiping selectivitychallengesindockingscreensforgpcrtargetsandantitargets
AT sassanomariaf selectivitychallengesindockingscreensforgpcrtargetsandantitargets
AT lyujiankun selectivitychallengesindockingscreensforgpcrtargetsandantitargets
AT rothbryanl selectivitychallengesindockingscreensforgpcrtargetsandantitargets
AT shoichetbriank selectivitychallengesindockingscreensforgpcrtargetsandantitargets