Cargando…

Characterization of an artificial skull cap for cranio-maxillofacial surgery training

Cranial grafts are favored to reconstruct skeletal defects because of their reduced resorption and their histocompatibility. Training possibilities for novice surgeons include the “learning by doing” on the patient, specimens or simulators. Although the acceptance of simulators is growing, the major...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hollensteiner, Marianne, Fürst, David, Augat, Peter, Schrödl, Falk, Esterer, Benjamin, Gabauer, Stefan, Hunger, Stefan, Malek, Michael, Stephan, Daniel, Schrempf, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6105196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30120585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6143-4
_version_ 1783349617462607872
author Hollensteiner, Marianne
Fürst, David
Augat, Peter
Schrödl, Falk
Esterer, Benjamin
Gabauer, Stefan
Hunger, Stefan
Malek, Michael
Stephan, Daniel
Schrempf, Andreas
author_facet Hollensteiner, Marianne
Fürst, David
Augat, Peter
Schrödl, Falk
Esterer, Benjamin
Gabauer, Stefan
Hunger, Stefan
Malek, Michael
Stephan, Daniel
Schrempf, Andreas
author_sort Hollensteiner, Marianne
collection PubMed
description Cranial grafts are favored to reconstruct skeletal defects because of their reduced resorption and their histocompatibility. Training possibilities for novice surgeons include the “learning by doing” on the patient, specimens or simulators. Although the acceptance of simulators is growing, the major drawback is the lack of validated bone models. The aim of this study was to create and validate a realistic skull cap model and to show superiority compared to a commercially available skull model. Characteristic forces during machinery procedures were recorded and thickness parameters from the bony layers were obtained. The thickness values of the bone layers of the developed parietal bone were comparable to the human ones. Differences between drilling and sawing forces of human and artificial bones were not detected using statistical analysis. In contrast the parameters of the commercially available skull model were significantly different. However, as a result, a model-based simulator for tabula externa graft lift training, consisting of a brain, skull bone cap and covering soft tissues was created. This simulator enables the training of all procedural steps of a “split thickness graft lift”. In conclusion, an artificial skull cap suitable for parietal graft lift training was manufactured and validated against human parietal bones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6105196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61051962018-08-30 Characterization of an artificial skull cap for cranio-maxillofacial surgery training Hollensteiner, Marianne Fürst, David Augat, Peter Schrödl, Falk Esterer, Benjamin Gabauer, Stefan Hunger, Stefan Malek, Michael Stephan, Daniel Schrempf, Andreas J Mater Sci Mater Med Clinical Applications of Biomaterials Cranial grafts are favored to reconstruct skeletal defects because of their reduced resorption and their histocompatibility. Training possibilities for novice surgeons include the “learning by doing” on the patient, specimens or simulators. Although the acceptance of simulators is growing, the major drawback is the lack of validated bone models. The aim of this study was to create and validate a realistic skull cap model and to show superiority compared to a commercially available skull model. Characteristic forces during machinery procedures were recorded and thickness parameters from the bony layers were obtained. The thickness values of the bone layers of the developed parietal bone were comparable to the human ones. Differences between drilling and sawing forces of human and artificial bones were not detected using statistical analysis. In contrast the parameters of the commercially available skull model were significantly different. However, as a result, a model-based simulator for tabula externa graft lift training, consisting of a brain, skull bone cap and covering soft tissues was created. This simulator enables the training of all procedural steps of a “split thickness graft lift”. In conclusion, an artificial skull cap suitable for parietal graft lift training was manufactured and validated against human parietal bones. Springer US 2018-08-17 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6105196/ /pubmed/30120585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6143-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Clinical Applications of Biomaterials
Hollensteiner, Marianne
Fürst, David
Augat, Peter
Schrödl, Falk
Esterer, Benjamin
Gabauer, Stefan
Hunger, Stefan
Malek, Michael
Stephan, Daniel
Schrempf, Andreas
Characterization of an artificial skull cap for cranio-maxillofacial surgery training
title Characterization of an artificial skull cap for cranio-maxillofacial surgery training
title_full Characterization of an artificial skull cap for cranio-maxillofacial surgery training
title_fullStr Characterization of an artificial skull cap for cranio-maxillofacial surgery training
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of an artificial skull cap for cranio-maxillofacial surgery training
title_short Characterization of an artificial skull cap for cranio-maxillofacial surgery training
title_sort characterization of an artificial skull cap for cranio-maxillofacial surgery training
topic Clinical Applications of Biomaterials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6105196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30120585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6143-4
work_keys_str_mv AT hollensteinermarianne characterizationofanartificialskullcapforcraniomaxillofacialsurgerytraining
AT furstdavid characterizationofanartificialskullcapforcraniomaxillofacialsurgerytraining
AT augatpeter characterizationofanartificialskullcapforcraniomaxillofacialsurgerytraining
AT schrodlfalk characterizationofanartificialskullcapforcraniomaxillofacialsurgerytraining
AT estererbenjamin characterizationofanartificialskullcapforcraniomaxillofacialsurgerytraining
AT gabauerstefan characterizationofanartificialskullcapforcraniomaxillofacialsurgerytraining
AT hungerstefan characterizationofanartificialskullcapforcraniomaxillofacialsurgerytraining
AT malekmichael characterizationofanartificialskullcapforcraniomaxillofacialsurgerytraining
AT stephandaniel characterizationofanartificialskullcapforcraniomaxillofacialsurgerytraining
AT schrempfandreas characterizationofanartificialskullcapforcraniomaxillofacialsurgerytraining