Cargando…

Do consumers care about substances of very high concern in articles?

BACKGROUND: Consumers have the right to inquire whether a consumer article contains substances of very high concern (‘SVHC right to know’). This communication tool is designed to stimulate suppliers to substitute such ingredients. A survey among 1321 consumers with high motivation and interest in ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hartmann, Sabrina, Klaschka, Ursula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6105235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30175022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0153-1
_version_ 1783349626891403264
author Hartmann, Sabrina
Klaschka, Ursula
author_facet Hartmann, Sabrina
Klaschka, Ursula
author_sort Hartmann, Sabrina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Consumers have the right to inquire whether a consumer article contains substances of very high concern (‘SVHC right to know’). This communication tool is designed to stimulate suppliers to substitute such ingredients. A survey among 1321 consumers with high motivation and interest in harmful substances in everyday products was conducted to understand the acceptance of this ‘right to know’ among consumers. RESULTS: Only one out of seven survey participants stated to be well informed about the ‘SVHC right to know’ with nearly all of them having good self-reported chemical knowledge. Three quarters of the participants who are not working with chemicals or REACH at their workplace have never heard about the ‘SVHC right to know’. Every second participant declared their interest to search for more information about an SVHC in a certain article, but, in fact, not more than 4% of all participants inquired for SVHCs with various methods. Only 1% would buy an SVHC-containing article with no strings attached. While detailed comments by some survey participants showed a high level of understanding of the issue, many respondents were not sure what the SVHC information means for their daily life. They declared that they would inform themselves, reduce the use of the article with SVHCs, circulate this information, or throw such an article into the garbage. Most study participants suggested improvements of the ‘SVHC right to know’. The preferred suggestions were a ban of SVHCs, easily understandable information on the packaging, full ingredient declaration on the articles, or no need to inquire for every single item, while smartphone applications for SVHC requests were the least popular suggestion in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Various reasons could be identified why most consumers—even these motivated and interested ones—do not use the ‘SVHC right to know’. This allowed developing recommendations for improving the effectiveness of this communication instrument on the way to the gradual elimination of SVHCs in consumer articles. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12302-018-0153-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6105235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61052352018-08-30 Do consumers care about substances of very high concern in articles? Hartmann, Sabrina Klaschka, Ursula Environ Sci Eur Research BACKGROUND: Consumers have the right to inquire whether a consumer article contains substances of very high concern (‘SVHC right to know’). This communication tool is designed to stimulate suppliers to substitute such ingredients. A survey among 1321 consumers with high motivation and interest in harmful substances in everyday products was conducted to understand the acceptance of this ‘right to know’ among consumers. RESULTS: Only one out of seven survey participants stated to be well informed about the ‘SVHC right to know’ with nearly all of them having good self-reported chemical knowledge. Three quarters of the participants who are not working with chemicals or REACH at their workplace have never heard about the ‘SVHC right to know’. Every second participant declared their interest to search for more information about an SVHC in a certain article, but, in fact, not more than 4% of all participants inquired for SVHCs with various methods. Only 1% would buy an SVHC-containing article with no strings attached. While detailed comments by some survey participants showed a high level of understanding of the issue, many respondents were not sure what the SVHC information means for their daily life. They declared that they would inform themselves, reduce the use of the article with SVHCs, circulate this information, or throw such an article into the garbage. Most study participants suggested improvements of the ‘SVHC right to know’. The preferred suggestions were a ban of SVHCs, easily understandable information on the packaging, full ingredient declaration on the articles, or no need to inquire for every single item, while smartphone applications for SVHC requests were the least popular suggestion in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Various reasons could be identified why most consumers—even these motivated and interested ones—do not use the ‘SVHC right to know’. This allowed developing recommendations for improving the effectiveness of this communication instrument on the way to the gradual elimination of SVHCs in consumer articles. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12302-018-0153-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-08-21 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6105235/ /pubmed/30175022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0153-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Hartmann, Sabrina
Klaschka, Ursula
Do consumers care about substances of very high concern in articles?
title Do consumers care about substances of very high concern in articles?
title_full Do consumers care about substances of very high concern in articles?
title_fullStr Do consumers care about substances of very high concern in articles?
title_full_unstemmed Do consumers care about substances of very high concern in articles?
title_short Do consumers care about substances of very high concern in articles?
title_sort do consumers care about substances of very high concern in articles?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6105235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30175022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0153-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hartmannsabrina doconsumerscareaboutsubstancesofveryhighconcerninarticles
AT klaschkaursula doconsumerscareaboutsubstancesofveryhighconcerninarticles