Cargando…
LXR/RXR signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling
Sex differences in heart failure development following myocardial infarction (MI) are not fully understood. We hypothesized that differential MI signaling could explain variations in outcomes. Analysis of the mouse heart attack research tool 1.0 (422 mice; young = 5.4 ± 0.1; old = 23.3 ± 0.1 months...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6105266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30132266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00395-018-0699-5 |
_version_ | 1783349634534473728 |
---|---|
author | DeLeon-Pennell, Kristine Y. Mouton, Alan J. Ero, Osasere K. Ma, Yonggang Padmanabhan Iyer, Rugmani Flynn, Elizabeth R. Espinoza, Ingrid Musani, Solomon K. Vasan, Ramachandran S. Hall, Michael E. Fox, Ervin R. Lindsey, Merry L. |
author_facet | DeLeon-Pennell, Kristine Y. Mouton, Alan J. Ero, Osasere K. Ma, Yonggang Padmanabhan Iyer, Rugmani Flynn, Elizabeth R. Espinoza, Ingrid Musani, Solomon K. Vasan, Ramachandran S. Hall, Michael E. Fox, Ervin R. Lindsey, Merry L. |
author_sort | DeLeon-Pennell, Kristine Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sex differences in heart failure development following myocardial infarction (MI) are not fully understood. We hypothesized that differential MI signaling could explain variations in outcomes. Analysis of the mouse heart attack research tool 1.0 (422 mice; young = 5.4 ± 0.1; old = 23.3 ± 0.1 months of age) was used to dissect MI signaling pathways, which was validated in a new cohort of mice (4.8 ± 0.2 months of age); and substantiated in humans. Plasma collected at visit 2 from the MI subset of the Jackson Heart Study (JHS; a community-based study consisting of middle aged and older adults of African ancestry) underwent glycoproteomics grouped by outcome: (1) heart failure hospitalization after visit 2 (n = 3 men/12 women) and (2) without hospitalization through 2012 (n = 24 men/21 women). Compared to young male mice, the infarct region of young females had fewer, but more efficient tissue clearing neutrophils with reduced pro-inflammatory gene expression. Apolipoprotein (Apo) F, which acts upstream of the liver X receptors/retinoid X receptor (LXR/RXR) pathway, was elevated in the day 7 infarcts of old mice compared to young controls and was increased in both men and women with heart failure. In vitro, Apo F stimulated CD36 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ activation in male neutrophils to turn off NF-κB activation and stimulate LXR/RXR signaling to initiate resolution. Female neutrophils were desensitized to Apo F and instead relied on thrombospondin-1 stimulation of CD36 to upregulate AMP-activated protein kinase, resulting in an overall better wound healing strategy. With age, female mice were desensitized to LXR/RXR signaling, resulting in enhanced interleukin-6 activation, a finding replicated in the JHS community cohort. This is the first report to uncover sex differences in post-MI neutrophil signaling that yielded better outcomes in young females and worse outcomes with age. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00395-018-0699-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6105266 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61052662018-08-30 LXR/RXR signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling DeLeon-Pennell, Kristine Y. Mouton, Alan J. Ero, Osasere K. Ma, Yonggang Padmanabhan Iyer, Rugmani Flynn, Elizabeth R. Espinoza, Ingrid Musani, Solomon K. Vasan, Ramachandran S. Hall, Michael E. Fox, Ervin R. Lindsey, Merry L. Basic Res Cardiol Original Contribution Sex differences in heart failure development following myocardial infarction (MI) are not fully understood. We hypothesized that differential MI signaling could explain variations in outcomes. Analysis of the mouse heart attack research tool 1.0 (422 mice; young = 5.4 ± 0.1; old = 23.3 ± 0.1 months of age) was used to dissect MI signaling pathways, which was validated in a new cohort of mice (4.8 ± 0.2 months of age); and substantiated in humans. Plasma collected at visit 2 from the MI subset of the Jackson Heart Study (JHS; a community-based study consisting of middle aged and older adults of African ancestry) underwent glycoproteomics grouped by outcome: (1) heart failure hospitalization after visit 2 (n = 3 men/12 women) and (2) without hospitalization through 2012 (n = 24 men/21 women). Compared to young male mice, the infarct region of young females had fewer, but more efficient tissue clearing neutrophils with reduced pro-inflammatory gene expression. Apolipoprotein (Apo) F, which acts upstream of the liver X receptors/retinoid X receptor (LXR/RXR) pathway, was elevated in the day 7 infarcts of old mice compared to young controls and was increased in both men and women with heart failure. In vitro, Apo F stimulated CD36 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ activation in male neutrophils to turn off NF-κB activation and stimulate LXR/RXR signaling to initiate resolution. Female neutrophils were desensitized to Apo F and instead relied on thrombospondin-1 stimulation of CD36 to upregulate AMP-activated protein kinase, resulting in an overall better wound healing strategy. With age, female mice were desensitized to LXR/RXR signaling, resulting in enhanced interleukin-6 activation, a finding replicated in the JHS community cohort. This is the first report to uncover sex differences in post-MI neutrophil signaling that yielded better outcomes in young females and worse outcomes with age. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00395-018-0699-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-08-21 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6105266/ /pubmed/30132266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00395-018-0699-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Contribution DeLeon-Pennell, Kristine Y. Mouton, Alan J. Ero, Osasere K. Ma, Yonggang Padmanabhan Iyer, Rugmani Flynn, Elizabeth R. Espinoza, Ingrid Musani, Solomon K. Vasan, Ramachandran S. Hall, Michael E. Fox, Ervin R. Lindsey, Merry L. LXR/RXR signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling |
title | LXR/RXR signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling |
title_full | LXR/RXR signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling |
title_fullStr | LXR/RXR signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling |
title_full_unstemmed | LXR/RXR signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling |
title_short | LXR/RXR signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling |
title_sort | lxr/rxr signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling |
topic | Original Contribution |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6105266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30132266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00395-018-0699-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deleonpennellkristiney lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling AT moutonalanj lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling AT eroosaserek lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling AT mayonggang lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling AT padmanabhaniyerrugmani lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling AT flynnelizabethr lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling AT espinozaingrid lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling AT musanisolomonk lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling AT vasanramachandrans lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling AT hallmichaele lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling AT foxervinr lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling AT lindseymerryl lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling |