Cargando…

LXR/RXR signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling

Sex differences in heart failure development following myocardial infarction (MI) are not fully understood. We hypothesized that differential MI signaling could explain variations in outcomes. Analysis of the mouse heart attack research tool 1.0 (422 mice; young = 5.4 ± 0.1; old = 23.3 ± 0.1 months...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DeLeon-Pennell, Kristine Y., Mouton, Alan J., Ero, Osasere K., Ma, Yonggang, Padmanabhan Iyer, Rugmani, Flynn, Elizabeth R., Espinoza, Ingrid, Musani, Solomon K., Vasan, Ramachandran S., Hall, Michael E., Fox, Ervin R., Lindsey, Merry L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6105266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30132266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00395-018-0699-5
_version_ 1783349634534473728
author DeLeon-Pennell, Kristine Y.
Mouton, Alan J.
Ero, Osasere K.
Ma, Yonggang
Padmanabhan Iyer, Rugmani
Flynn, Elizabeth R.
Espinoza, Ingrid
Musani, Solomon K.
Vasan, Ramachandran S.
Hall, Michael E.
Fox, Ervin R.
Lindsey, Merry L.
author_facet DeLeon-Pennell, Kristine Y.
Mouton, Alan J.
Ero, Osasere K.
Ma, Yonggang
Padmanabhan Iyer, Rugmani
Flynn, Elizabeth R.
Espinoza, Ingrid
Musani, Solomon K.
Vasan, Ramachandran S.
Hall, Michael E.
Fox, Ervin R.
Lindsey, Merry L.
author_sort DeLeon-Pennell, Kristine Y.
collection PubMed
description Sex differences in heart failure development following myocardial infarction (MI) are not fully understood. We hypothesized that differential MI signaling could explain variations in outcomes. Analysis of the mouse heart attack research tool 1.0 (422 mice; young = 5.4 ± 0.1; old = 23.3 ± 0.1 months of age) was used to dissect MI signaling pathways, which was validated in a new cohort of mice (4.8 ± 0.2 months of age); and substantiated in humans. Plasma collected at visit 2 from the MI subset of the Jackson Heart Study (JHS; a community-based study consisting of middle aged and older adults of African ancestry) underwent glycoproteomics grouped by outcome: (1) heart failure hospitalization after visit 2 (n = 3 men/12 women) and (2) without hospitalization through 2012 (n = 24 men/21 women). Compared to young male mice, the infarct region of young females had fewer, but more efficient tissue clearing neutrophils with reduced pro-inflammatory gene expression. Apolipoprotein (Apo) F, which acts upstream of the liver X receptors/retinoid X receptor (LXR/RXR) pathway, was elevated in the day 7 infarcts of old mice compared to young controls and was increased in both men and women with heart failure. In vitro, Apo F stimulated CD36 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ activation in male neutrophils to turn off NF-κB activation and stimulate LXR/RXR signaling to initiate resolution. Female neutrophils were desensitized to Apo F and instead relied on thrombospondin-1 stimulation of CD36 to upregulate AMP-activated protein kinase, resulting in an overall better wound healing strategy. With age, female mice were desensitized to LXR/RXR signaling, resulting in enhanced interleukin-6 activation, a finding replicated in the JHS community cohort. This is the first report to uncover sex differences in post-MI neutrophil signaling that yielded better outcomes in young females and worse outcomes with age. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00395-018-0699-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6105266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61052662018-08-30 LXR/RXR signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling DeLeon-Pennell, Kristine Y. Mouton, Alan J. Ero, Osasere K. Ma, Yonggang Padmanabhan Iyer, Rugmani Flynn, Elizabeth R. Espinoza, Ingrid Musani, Solomon K. Vasan, Ramachandran S. Hall, Michael E. Fox, Ervin R. Lindsey, Merry L. Basic Res Cardiol Original Contribution Sex differences in heart failure development following myocardial infarction (MI) are not fully understood. We hypothesized that differential MI signaling could explain variations in outcomes. Analysis of the mouse heart attack research tool 1.0 (422 mice; young = 5.4 ± 0.1; old = 23.3 ± 0.1 months of age) was used to dissect MI signaling pathways, which was validated in a new cohort of mice (4.8 ± 0.2 months of age); and substantiated in humans. Plasma collected at visit 2 from the MI subset of the Jackson Heart Study (JHS; a community-based study consisting of middle aged and older adults of African ancestry) underwent glycoproteomics grouped by outcome: (1) heart failure hospitalization after visit 2 (n = 3 men/12 women) and (2) without hospitalization through 2012 (n = 24 men/21 women). Compared to young male mice, the infarct region of young females had fewer, but more efficient tissue clearing neutrophils with reduced pro-inflammatory gene expression. Apolipoprotein (Apo) F, which acts upstream of the liver X receptors/retinoid X receptor (LXR/RXR) pathway, was elevated in the day 7 infarcts of old mice compared to young controls and was increased in both men and women with heart failure. In vitro, Apo F stimulated CD36 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ activation in male neutrophils to turn off NF-κB activation and stimulate LXR/RXR signaling to initiate resolution. Female neutrophils were desensitized to Apo F and instead relied on thrombospondin-1 stimulation of CD36 to upregulate AMP-activated protein kinase, resulting in an overall better wound healing strategy. With age, female mice were desensitized to LXR/RXR signaling, resulting in enhanced interleukin-6 activation, a finding replicated in the JHS community cohort. This is the first report to uncover sex differences in post-MI neutrophil signaling that yielded better outcomes in young females and worse outcomes with age. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00395-018-0699-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-08-21 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6105266/ /pubmed/30132266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00395-018-0699-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Contribution
DeLeon-Pennell, Kristine Y.
Mouton, Alan J.
Ero, Osasere K.
Ma, Yonggang
Padmanabhan Iyer, Rugmani
Flynn, Elizabeth R.
Espinoza, Ingrid
Musani, Solomon K.
Vasan, Ramachandran S.
Hall, Michael E.
Fox, Ervin R.
Lindsey, Merry L.
LXR/RXR signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling
title LXR/RXR signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling
title_full LXR/RXR signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling
title_fullStr LXR/RXR signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling
title_full_unstemmed LXR/RXR signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling
title_short LXR/RXR signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling
title_sort lxr/rxr signaling and neutrophil phenotype following myocardial infarction classify sex differences in remodeling
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6105266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30132266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00395-018-0699-5
work_keys_str_mv AT deleonpennellkristiney lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling
AT moutonalanj lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling
AT eroosaserek lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling
AT mayonggang lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling
AT padmanabhaniyerrugmani lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling
AT flynnelizabethr lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling
AT espinozaingrid lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling
AT musanisolomonk lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling
AT vasanramachandrans lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling
AT hallmichaele lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling
AT foxervinr lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling
AT lindseymerryl lxrrxrsignalingandneutrophilphenotypefollowingmyocardialinfarctionclassifysexdifferencesinremodeling