Cargando…
Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection in patients aged ≥60 years (EXTEND): analysis of cost-effectiveness
OBJECTIVES: The randomized Phase IIIb/IV EXTEND trial showed that extended-pulsed fidaxomicin significantly improved sustained clinical cure and reduced recurrence versus vancomycin in patients ≥60 years old with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Cost-effectiveness of extended-pulsed fidaxomici...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6105871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29800295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky184 |
_version_ | 1783349699386802176 |
---|---|
author | Cornely, Oliver A Watt, Maureen McCrea, Charles Goldenberg, Simon D De Nigris, Enrico |
author_facet | Cornely, Oliver A Watt, Maureen McCrea, Charles Goldenberg, Simon D De Nigris, Enrico |
author_sort | Cornely, Oliver A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The randomized Phase IIIb/IV EXTEND trial showed that extended-pulsed fidaxomicin significantly improved sustained clinical cure and reduced recurrence versus vancomycin in patients ≥60 years old with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Cost-effectiveness of extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin as first-line therapy for CDI was evaluated in this patient population. METHODS: Clinical results from EXTEND and inputs from published sources were used in a semi-Markov treatment-sequence model with nine health states and a 1 year time horizon to assess costs and QALYs. The model was based on a healthcare system perspective (NHS and Personal Social Services) in England. Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Patients receiving first-line extended-pulsed fidaxomicin treatment had a 0.02 QALY gain compared with first-line vancomycin (0.6267 versus 0.6038 QALYs/patient). While total drug acquisition costs were higher for extended-pulsed fidaxomicin than for vancomycin when used first-line (£1356 versus £260/patient), these were offset by lower total hospitalization costs (which also included treatment monitoring and community care costs; £10 815 versus £11 459/patient) and lower costs of managing adverse events (£694 versus £1199/patient), reflecting the lower incidence of CDI recurrence and adverse events with extended-pulsed fidaxomicin. Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin cost £53 less per patient than vancomycin over 1 year. The probability that first-line extended-pulsed fidaxomicin was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30 000/QALY was 76% in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: While fidaxomicin acquisition costs are higher than those of vancomycin, the observed reduced recurrence rate with extended-pulsed fidaxomicin makes it a more effective and less costly treatment strategy than vancomycin for first-line treatment of CDI in older patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6105871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61058712018-08-27 Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection in patients aged ≥60 years (EXTEND): analysis of cost-effectiveness Cornely, Oliver A Watt, Maureen McCrea, Charles Goldenberg, Simon D De Nigris, Enrico J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research OBJECTIVES: The randomized Phase IIIb/IV EXTEND trial showed that extended-pulsed fidaxomicin significantly improved sustained clinical cure and reduced recurrence versus vancomycin in patients ≥60 years old with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Cost-effectiveness of extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin as first-line therapy for CDI was evaluated in this patient population. METHODS: Clinical results from EXTEND and inputs from published sources were used in a semi-Markov treatment-sequence model with nine health states and a 1 year time horizon to assess costs and QALYs. The model was based on a healthcare system perspective (NHS and Personal Social Services) in England. Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Patients receiving first-line extended-pulsed fidaxomicin treatment had a 0.02 QALY gain compared with first-line vancomycin (0.6267 versus 0.6038 QALYs/patient). While total drug acquisition costs were higher for extended-pulsed fidaxomicin than for vancomycin when used first-line (£1356 versus £260/patient), these were offset by lower total hospitalization costs (which also included treatment monitoring and community care costs; £10 815 versus £11 459/patient) and lower costs of managing adverse events (£694 versus £1199/patient), reflecting the lower incidence of CDI recurrence and adverse events with extended-pulsed fidaxomicin. Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin cost £53 less per patient than vancomycin over 1 year. The probability that first-line extended-pulsed fidaxomicin was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30 000/QALY was 76% in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: While fidaxomicin acquisition costs are higher than those of vancomycin, the observed reduced recurrence rate with extended-pulsed fidaxomicin makes it a more effective and less costly treatment strategy than vancomycin for first-line treatment of CDI in older patients. Oxford University Press 2018-09 2018-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6105871/ /pubmed/29800295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky184 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Research Cornely, Oliver A Watt, Maureen McCrea, Charles Goldenberg, Simon D De Nigris, Enrico Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection in patients aged ≥60 years (EXTEND): analysis of cost-effectiveness |
title | Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection in patients aged ≥60 years (EXTEND): analysis of cost-effectiveness |
title_full | Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection in patients aged ≥60 years (EXTEND): analysis of cost-effectiveness |
title_fullStr | Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection in patients aged ≥60 years (EXTEND): analysis of cost-effectiveness |
title_full_unstemmed | Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection in patients aged ≥60 years (EXTEND): analysis of cost-effectiveness |
title_short | Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection in patients aged ≥60 years (EXTEND): analysis of cost-effectiveness |
title_sort | extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for clostridium difficile infection in patients aged ≥60 years (extend): analysis of cost-effectiveness |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6105871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29800295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky184 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cornelyolivera extendedpulsedfidaxomicinversusvancomycinforclostridiumdifficileinfectioninpatientsaged60yearsextendanalysisofcosteffectiveness AT wattmaureen extendedpulsedfidaxomicinversusvancomycinforclostridiumdifficileinfectioninpatientsaged60yearsextendanalysisofcosteffectiveness AT mccreacharles extendedpulsedfidaxomicinversusvancomycinforclostridiumdifficileinfectioninpatientsaged60yearsextendanalysisofcosteffectiveness AT goldenbergsimond extendedpulsedfidaxomicinversusvancomycinforclostridiumdifficileinfectioninpatientsaged60yearsextendanalysisofcosteffectiveness AT denigrisenrico extendedpulsedfidaxomicinversusvancomycinforclostridiumdifficileinfectioninpatientsaged60yearsextendanalysisofcosteffectiveness |