Cargando…

A New Software Platform to Improve Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Workflows and User Satisfaction: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: Workflow and preparation for holding multidisciplinary cancer case reviews (i.e., Tumor Boards) is time-consuming and cumbersome. Use of a software platform might improve this process. This pilot study assessed the impact of a new software platform on tumor board preparation workflow and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krupinski, Elizabeth A., Comas, Merce, Gallego, Leia Garrote
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6106126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30167341
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_16_18
_version_ 1783349720489394176
author Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
Comas, Merce
Gallego, Leia Garrote
author_facet Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
Comas, Merce
Gallego, Leia Garrote
author_sort Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Workflow and preparation for holding multidisciplinary cancer case reviews (i.e., Tumor Boards) is time-consuming and cumbersome. Use of a software platform might improve this process. This pilot study assessed the impact of a new software platform on tumor board preparation workflow and user satisfaction compared to current methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using current methods and the NAVIFY Tumor Board Solution, this study assessed the number of tasks and time to prepare tumor board cases. Participants completed online surveys assessing ease of use and satisfaction with current and new platforms. RESULTS: A total of 41 sessions included two surgeons, two oncologists, two pathologists, and two radiologists preparing tumor board cases with 734 tasks were recorded. Overall, there was no difference in the number of tasks using either preparation method (341 current, 393 NAVIFY Tumor Board solution). There was a significant difference in overall preparation time as a function of specialty (F = 71.74, P < 0.0001), with oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons having reduced times with NAVIFY Tumor Board solution compared to the current platform and pathologists having equivalent times. There was a significant difference (F = 38.98, P < 0.0001) for times as a function of task category. Review of clinical course data and other preparation tasks decreased significantly, but pathology and radiology review did not differ significantly. The new platform received higher ratings than the current methods on all survey questions regarding the ease of use and satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The study supported the hypothesis that the new software platform can improve Tumor Board preparation. Further study is needed to assess the impact of this platform in different hospitals, different data storage systems, with different observers, and different types of Tumor board cases as well as its impact on the quality of the tumor board discussion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6106126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61061262018-08-30 A New Software Platform to Improve Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Workflows and User Satisfaction: A Pilot Study Krupinski, Elizabeth A. Comas, Merce Gallego, Leia Garrote J Pathol Inform Research Article BACKGROUND: Workflow and preparation for holding multidisciplinary cancer case reviews (i.e., Tumor Boards) is time-consuming and cumbersome. Use of a software platform might improve this process. This pilot study assessed the impact of a new software platform on tumor board preparation workflow and user satisfaction compared to current methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using current methods and the NAVIFY Tumor Board Solution, this study assessed the number of tasks and time to prepare tumor board cases. Participants completed online surveys assessing ease of use and satisfaction with current and new platforms. RESULTS: A total of 41 sessions included two surgeons, two oncologists, two pathologists, and two radiologists preparing tumor board cases with 734 tasks were recorded. Overall, there was no difference in the number of tasks using either preparation method (341 current, 393 NAVIFY Tumor Board solution). There was a significant difference in overall preparation time as a function of specialty (F = 71.74, P < 0.0001), with oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons having reduced times with NAVIFY Tumor Board solution compared to the current platform and pathologists having equivalent times. There was a significant difference (F = 38.98, P < 0.0001) for times as a function of task category. Review of clinical course data and other preparation tasks decreased significantly, but pathology and radiology review did not differ significantly. The new platform received higher ratings than the current methods on all survey questions regarding the ease of use and satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The study supported the hypothesis that the new software platform can improve Tumor Board preparation. Further study is needed to assess the impact of this platform in different hospitals, different data storage systems, with different observers, and different types of Tumor board cases as well as its impact on the quality of the tumor board discussion. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6106126/ /pubmed/30167341 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_16_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Pathology Informatics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research Article
Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
Comas, Merce
Gallego, Leia Garrote
A New Software Platform to Improve Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Workflows and User Satisfaction: A Pilot Study
title A New Software Platform to Improve Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Workflows and User Satisfaction: A Pilot Study
title_full A New Software Platform to Improve Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Workflows and User Satisfaction: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr A New Software Platform to Improve Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Workflows and User Satisfaction: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed A New Software Platform to Improve Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Workflows and User Satisfaction: A Pilot Study
title_short A New Software Platform to Improve Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Workflows and User Satisfaction: A Pilot Study
title_sort new software platform to improve multidisciplinary tumor board workflows and user satisfaction: a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6106126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30167341
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_16_18
work_keys_str_mv AT krupinskielizabetha anewsoftwareplatformtoimprovemultidisciplinarytumorboardworkflowsandusersatisfactionapilotstudy
AT comasmerce anewsoftwareplatformtoimprovemultidisciplinarytumorboardworkflowsandusersatisfactionapilotstudy
AT gallegoleiagarrote anewsoftwareplatformtoimprovemultidisciplinarytumorboardworkflowsandusersatisfactionapilotstudy
AT anewsoftwareplatformtoimprovemultidisciplinarytumorboardworkflowsandusersatisfactionapilotstudy
AT krupinskielizabetha newsoftwareplatformtoimprovemultidisciplinarytumorboardworkflowsandusersatisfactionapilotstudy
AT comasmerce newsoftwareplatformtoimprovemultidisciplinarytumorboardworkflowsandusersatisfactionapilotstudy
AT gallegoleiagarrote newsoftwareplatformtoimprovemultidisciplinarytumorboardworkflowsandusersatisfactionapilotstudy
AT newsoftwareplatformtoimprovemultidisciplinarytumorboardworkflowsandusersatisfactionapilotstudy