Cargando…

Estimating densities of large herbivores in tropical forests: Rigorous evaluation of a dung‐based method

When sighting‐based surveys to estimate population densities of large herbivores in tropical dense forests are not practical or affordable, surveys that rely on animal dung are sometimes used. This study tested one such dung‐based method by deriving population densities from observed dung densities...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahrestani, Farshid S., Kumar, N. Samba, Vaidyanathan, Srinivas, Hiby, Lex, Jathanna, Devcharan, Karanth, K. Ullas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6106164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4227
_version_ 1783349727403704320
author Ahrestani, Farshid S.
Kumar, N. Samba
Vaidyanathan, Srinivas
Hiby, Lex
Jathanna, Devcharan
Karanth, K. Ullas
author_facet Ahrestani, Farshid S.
Kumar, N. Samba
Vaidyanathan, Srinivas
Hiby, Lex
Jathanna, Devcharan
Karanth, K. Ullas
author_sort Ahrestani, Farshid S.
collection PubMed
description When sighting‐based surveys to estimate population densities of large herbivores in tropical dense forests are not practical or affordable, surveys that rely on animal dung are sometimes used. This study tested one such dung‐based method by deriving population densities from observed dung densities of six large herbivores (chital, elephant, gaur, muntjac, sambar, and wild pig) in two habitats, dry deciduous forests (DDF) and moist deciduous forests (MDF), within Nagarahole National Park, southern India. Using the program DUNGSURV, dung pile counts, decay rates estimated from field experiments, and defecation rates derived from literature were analyzed together by a model that allows for random events affecting dung decay. Densities of chital were the highest, followed by sambar. Wild pig densities were similar in the two habitats, sambar densities were higher in DDF, and densities of the other species were higher in MDF than in DDF. We compared DUNGSURV estimates with densities estimated using distance sampling in the same season. DUNGSURV estimates were substantially higher for all species in both habitats. These differences highlight the challenges that researchers face in computing unbiased estimates of dung decay rates and in relying on defecation rates from literature. Besides the elephant, this study is the first to rigorously test the efficacy of using a dung‐based approach to estimate densities of large herbivore species in Asia, and based on this evaluation, we provide specific recommendations to address issues that require careful consideration before observed dung densities are used to derive animal densities. Our results underline the need for an experimental study of a known population in a fenced reserve to validate the true potential of using dung‐based approaches to estimate population densities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6106164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61061642018-08-27 Estimating densities of large herbivores in tropical forests: Rigorous evaluation of a dung‐based method Ahrestani, Farshid S. Kumar, N. Samba Vaidyanathan, Srinivas Hiby, Lex Jathanna, Devcharan Karanth, K. Ullas Ecol Evol Original Research When sighting‐based surveys to estimate population densities of large herbivores in tropical dense forests are not practical or affordable, surveys that rely on animal dung are sometimes used. This study tested one such dung‐based method by deriving population densities from observed dung densities of six large herbivores (chital, elephant, gaur, muntjac, sambar, and wild pig) in two habitats, dry deciduous forests (DDF) and moist deciduous forests (MDF), within Nagarahole National Park, southern India. Using the program DUNGSURV, dung pile counts, decay rates estimated from field experiments, and defecation rates derived from literature were analyzed together by a model that allows for random events affecting dung decay. Densities of chital were the highest, followed by sambar. Wild pig densities were similar in the two habitats, sambar densities were higher in DDF, and densities of the other species were higher in MDF than in DDF. We compared DUNGSURV estimates with densities estimated using distance sampling in the same season. DUNGSURV estimates were substantially higher for all species in both habitats. These differences highlight the challenges that researchers face in computing unbiased estimates of dung decay rates and in relying on defecation rates from literature. Besides the elephant, this study is the first to rigorously test the efficacy of using a dung‐based approach to estimate densities of large herbivore species in Asia, and based on this evaluation, we provide specific recommendations to address issues that require careful consideration before observed dung densities are used to derive animal densities. Our results underline the need for an experimental study of a known population in a fenced reserve to validate the true potential of using dung‐based approaches to estimate population densities. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6106164/ /pubmed/30151151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4227 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ahrestani, Farshid S.
Kumar, N. Samba
Vaidyanathan, Srinivas
Hiby, Lex
Jathanna, Devcharan
Karanth, K. Ullas
Estimating densities of large herbivores in tropical forests: Rigorous evaluation of a dung‐based method
title Estimating densities of large herbivores in tropical forests: Rigorous evaluation of a dung‐based method
title_full Estimating densities of large herbivores in tropical forests: Rigorous evaluation of a dung‐based method
title_fullStr Estimating densities of large herbivores in tropical forests: Rigorous evaluation of a dung‐based method
title_full_unstemmed Estimating densities of large herbivores in tropical forests: Rigorous evaluation of a dung‐based method
title_short Estimating densities of large herbivores in tropical forests: Rigorous evaluation of a dung‐based method
title_sort estimating densities of large herbivores in tropical forests: rigorous evaluation of a dung‐based method
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6106164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4227
work_keys_str_mv AT ahrestanifarshids estimatingdensitiesoflargeherbivoresintropicalforestsrigorousevaluationofadungbasedmethod
AT kumarnsamba estimatingdensitiesoflargeherbivoresintropicalforestsrigorousevaluationofadungbasedmethod
AT vaidyanathansrinivas estimatingdensitiesoflargeherbivoresintropicalforestsrigorousevaluationofadungbasedmethod
AT hibylex estimatingdensitiesoflargeherbivoresintropicalforestsrigorousevaluationofadungbasedmethod
AT jathannadevcharan estimatingdensitiesoflargeherbivoresintropicalforestsrigorousevaluationofadungbasedmethod
AT karanthkullas estimatingdensitiesoflargeherbivoresintropicalforestsrigorousevaluationofadungbasedmethod