Cargando…

Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios

What does the future hold for the world’s ecosystems and benefits that people obtain from them? While the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) has identified the development of scenarios as a key to helping decision makers identify potential impacts of different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kok, Marcel T. J., Kok, Kasper, Peterson, Garry D., Hill, Rosemary, Agard, John, Carpenter, Stephen R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6106191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30174750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0354-8
_version_ 1783349733884952576
author Kok, Marcel T. J.
Kok, Kasper
Peterson, Garry D.
Hill, Rosemary
Agard, John
Carpenter, Stephen R.
author_facet Kok, Marcel T. J.
Kok, Kasper
Peterson, Garry D.
Hill, Rosemary
Agard, John
Carpenter, Stephen R.
author_sort Kok, Marcel T. J.
collection PubMed
description What does the future hold for the world’s ecosystems and benefits that people obtain from them? While the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) has identified the development of scenarios as a key to helping decision makers identify potential impacts of different policy options, it currently lacks a long-term scenario strategy. IPBES will decide how it will approach scenarios at its plenary meeting on 22–28 February 2016, in Kuala Lumpur. IPBES now needs to decide whether it should create new scenarios that better explore ecosystem services and biodiversity dynamics. For IPBES to capture the social-ecological dynamics of biodiversity and ecosystem services, it is essential to engage with the great diversity of local contexts, while also including the global tele-coupling among local places. We present and compare three alternative scenario strategies that IPBES could use and then suggest a bottom-up, cross-scale scenario strategy to improve the policy relevance of future IPBES assessments. We propose five concrete steps as part of an effective, long term scenario development process for IPBES in cooperation with the scientific community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6106191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61061912018-08-30 Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios Kok, Marcel T. J. Kok, Kasper Peterson, Garry D. Hill, Rosemary Agard, John Carpenter, Stephen R. Sustain Sci Note and Comment What does the future hold for the world’s ecosystems and benefits that people obtain from them? While the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) has identified the development of scenarios as a key to helping decision makers identify potential impacts of different policy options, it currently lacks a long-term scenario strategy. IPBES will decide how it will approach scenarios at its plenary meeting on 22–28 February 2016, in Kuala Lumpur. IPBES now needs to decide whether it should create new scenarios that better explore ecosystem services and biodiversity dynamics. For IPBES to capture the social-ecological dynamics of biodiversity and ecosystem services, it is essential to engage with the great diversity of local contexts, while also including the global tele-coupling among local places. We present and compare three alternative scenario strategies that IPBES could use and then suggest a bottom-up, cross-scale scenario strategy to improve the policy relevance of future IPBES assessments. We propose five concrete steps as part of an effective, long term scenario development process for IPBES in cooperation with the scientific community. Springer Japan 2016-02-09 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC6106191/ /pubmed/30174750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0354-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Note and Comment
Kok, Marcel T. J.
Kok, Kasper
Peterson, Garry D.
Hill, Rosemary
Agard, John
Carpenter, Stephen R.
Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios
title Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios
title_full Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios
title_fullStr Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios
title_full_unstemmed Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios
title_short Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios
title_sort biodiversity and ecosystem services require ipbes to take novel approach to scenarios
topic Note and Comment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6106191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30174750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0354-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kokmarceltj biodiversityandecosystemservicesrequireipbestotakenovelapproachtoscenarios
AT kokkasper biodiversityandecosystemservicesrequireipbestotakenovelapproachtoscenarios
AT petersongarryd biodiversityandecosystemservicesrequireipbestotakenovelapproachtoscenarios
AT hillrosemary biodiversityandecosystemservicesrequireipbestotakenovelapproachtoscenarios
AT agardjohn biodiversityandecosystemservicesrequireipbestotakenovelapproachtoscenarios
AT carpenterstephenr biodiversityandecosystemservicesrequireipbestotakenovelapproachtoscenarios