Cargando…

PEEK versus Silicon Interspinous Spacer for Reduction of Supradjacent Segment Degeneration following Decompression and Short-Segment Instrumentation for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

PURPOSE: A retrospective study that aims to report Adjacent Segment Degeneration (ASD) incidence and spinopelvic balance in short lumbosacral instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Although ASD is a common complication following lumbar fusion, the effect of an interspinous spacer (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Korovessis, Panagiotis, Syrimpeis, Vasileios, Tsekouras, Vasileios, Vardakastanis, Konstantinos, Fennema, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6106718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30174959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1623647
_version_ 1783349832992161792
author Korovessis, Panagiotis
Syrimpeis, Vasileios
Tsekouras, Vasileios
Vardakastanis, Konstantinos
Fennema, Peter
author_facet Korovessis, Panagiotis
Syrimpeis, Vasileios
Tsekouras, Vasileios
Vardakastanis, Konstantinos
Fennema, Peter
author_sort Korovessis, Panagiotis
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: A retrospective study that aims to report Adjacent Segment Degeneration (ASD) incidence and spinopelvic balance in short lumbosacral instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Although ASD is a common complication following lumbar fusion, the effect of an interspinous spacer (IS) in the supradjacent segment in short lumbosacral instrumented fusion and its interaction with spinopelvic balance has not been studied adequately. METHODS: From 55 consecutive age-, diagnosis-, and gender-matched patients aged 60±11 years, 17 (Group R) received PEEK IS; 18 (Group S) received Silicon IS compared with 20 controls (Group C) without receiving any IS. The functional outcome was evaluated with VAS and ODI. Spinopelvic balance was evaluated using SVA, T(12)-S(1) LL, SS, PT, PI, and supradjacent segment disc heights. All spines were preoperatively balanced (SVA<40 mm). RESULTS: The follow-up averaged out to 56±11 months. VAS and ODI scores improved postoperatively in all 3 groups. SS and anterior disc height in the supradjacent free segment increased postoperatively compensatory to spinal alterations. Although 6, 4, and 5 patients from Groups R, S, and C, respectively, showed radiological progression of the preoperative degeneration grade in the supradjacent disc, only 2, 1, and 2 patients in Groups R, S, and C, respectively, developed symptomatic ASD in the 1(st) supradjacent segment solely. No additional surgery was required in any patient. CONCLUSION: ASD incidence in the supradjacent segment following short lumbar fusion did not statistically significantly differ between PEEK and Silicon IS. There was a trend towards lower ASD incidence in Silicon IS. IS reduced ASD in both 1(st) and 2(nd) supradjacent segments. The authors speculate that soft stabilization provided by IS may be more advantageous for preventing ASD. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.govNCT03477955.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6106718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61067182018-09-02 PEEK versus Silicon Interspinous Spacer for Reduction of Supradjacent Segment Degeneration following Decompression and Short-Segment Instrumentation for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Korovessis, Panagiotis Syrimpeis, Vasileios Tsekouras, Vasileios Vardakastanis, Konstantinos Fennema, Peter Adv Orthop Clinical Study PURPOSE: A retrospective study that aims to report Adjacent Segment Degeneration (ASD) incidence and spinopelvic balance in short lumbosacral instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Although ASD is a common complication following lumbar fusion, the effect of an interspinous spacer (IS) in the supradjacent segment in short lumbosacral instrumented fusion and its interaction with spinopelvic balance has not been studied adequately. METHODS: From 55 consecutive age-, diagnosis-, and gender-matched patients aged 60±11 years, 17 (Group R) received PEEK IS; 18 (Group S) received Silicon IS compared with 20 controls (Group C) without receiving any IS. The functional outcome was evaluated with VAS and ODI. Spinopelvic balance was evaluated using SVA, T(12)-S(1) LL, SS, PT, PI, and supradjacent segment disc heights. All spines were preoperatively balanced (SVA<40 mm). RESULTS: The follow-up averaged out to 56±11 months. VAS and ODI scores improved postoperatively in all 3 groups. SS and anterior disc height in the supradjacent free segment increased postoperatively compensatory to spinal alterations. Although 6, 4, and 5 patients from Groups R, S, and C, respectively, showed radiological progression of the preoperative degeneration grade in the supradjacent disc, only 2, 1, and 2 patients in Groups R, S, and C, respectively, developed symptomatic ASD in the 1(st) supradjacent segment solely. No additional surgery was required in any patient. CONCLUSION: ASD incidence in the supradjacent segment following short lumbar fusion did not statistically significantly differ between PEEK and Silicon IS. There was a trend towards lower ASD incidence in Silicon IS. IS reduced ASD in both 1(st) and 2(nd) supradjacent segments. The authors speculate that soft stabilization provided by IS may be more advantageous for preventing ASD. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.govNCT03477955. Hindawi 2018-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6106718/ /pubmed/30174959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1623647 Text en Copyright © 2018 Panagiotis Korovessis et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Korovessis, Panagiotis
Syrimpeis, Vasileios
Tsekouras, Vasileios
Vardakastanis, Konstantinos
Fennema, Peter
PEEK versus Silicon Interspinous Spacer for Reduction of Supradjacent Segment Degeneration following Decompression and Short-Segment Instrumentation for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title PEEK versus Silicon Interspinous Spacer for Reduction of Supradjacent Segment Degeneration following Decompression and Short-Segment Instrumentation for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_full PEEK versus Silicon Interspinous Spacer for Reduction of Supradjacent Segment Degeneration following Decompression and Short-Segment Instrumentation for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_fullStr PEEK versus Silicon Interspinous Spacer for Reduction of Supradjacent Segment Degeneration following Decompression and Short-Segment Instrumentation for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed PEEK versus Silicon Interspinous Spacer for Reduction of Supradjacent Segment Degeneration following Decompression and Short-Segment Instrumentation for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_short PEEK versus Silicon Interspinous Spacer for Reduction of Supradjacent Segment Degeneration following Decompression and Short-Segment Instrumentation for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
title_sort peek versus silicon interspinous spacer for reduction of supradjacent segment degeneration following decompression and short-segment instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6106718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30174959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1623647
work_keys_str_mv AT korovessispanagiotis peekversussiliconinterspinousspacerforreductionofsupradjacentsegmentdegenerationfollowingdecompressionandshortsegmentinstrumentationfordegenerativelumbarspinalstenosis
AT syrimpeisvasileios peekversussiliconinterspinousspacerforreductionofsupradjacentsegmentdegenerationfollowingdecompressionandshortsegmentinstrumentationfordegenerativelumbarspinalstenosis
AT tsekourasvasileios peekversussiliconinterspinousspacerforreductionofsupradjacentsegmentdegenerationfollowingdecompressionandshortsegmentinstrumentationfordegenerativelumbarspinalstenosis
AT vardakastaniskonstantinos peekversussiliconinterspinousspacerforreductionofsupradjacentsegmentdegenerationfollowingdecompressionandshortsegmentinstrumentationfordegenerativelumbarspinalstenosis
AT fennemapeter peekversussiliconinterspinousspacerforreductionofsupradjacentsegmentdegenerationfollowingdecompressionandshortsegmentinstrumentationfordegenerativelumbarspinalstenosis