Cargando…

LINAC stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia –retrospective two-institutional examination of treatment outcomes

BACKGROUND: In this pooled 2-center series LINAC radiosurgery (SRS) has been applied as a treatment option for a subset of refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN) patients. This study approached to retrospectively assess the efficacy and safety of LINAC SRS and to provide a brief overview addressed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rashid, Ali, Pintea, Bogdan, Kinfe, Thomas M., Surber, Gunnar, Hamm, Klaus, Boström, Jan P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6106738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30134992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1102-2
_version_ 1783349837688733696
author Rashid, Ali
Pintea, Bogdan
Kinfe, Thomas M.
Surber, Gunnar
Hamm, Klaus
Boström, Jan P.
author_facet Rashid, Ali
Pintea, Bogdan
Kinfe, Thomas M.
Surber, Gunnar
Hamm, Klaus
Boström, Jan P.
author_sort Rashid, Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In this pooled 2-center series LINAC radiosurgery (SRS) has been applied as a treatment option for a subset of refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN) patients. This study approached to retrospectively assess the efficacy and safety of LINAC SRS and to provide a brief overview addressed to the technical development from frame-based towards frameless robotic SRS. METHODS: From 2001 to 2017 n = 55 patients (pts) were treated, n = 28 were female (51%), mean age: 66 years (range 36–93 years); TN etiology: 37 classic TN, 15 multiple sclerosis (MS)-related TN, 2 symptomatic TN, and 1 atypical TN. Previous treatment was present in n = 35 (63.6%) pts. (some multiple or combined) with n = 23 microsurgical vascular decompression and n = 17 percutaneous retrogasserian rhizotomy. A 6 MV LINAC (4–5 mm collimators) was applied in all pts. (n = 26 framebased - n = 29 frameless robotic). The dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) was targeted in n = 35 cases and the retrogasserian target in n = 20 pts. with a homogeneous dose for the entire study cohort (90 Gy). SRS outcome was measured using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) score for pain and hypaesthesia and statistically evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyzes. RESULTS: Mean follow-up (FU) was 30 months (2 lost FU); the total rate of post SRS BNI pain I-IIIa (=painfree w or w/o medication) was 69% (88% for the classic TN pts), 29% (38.8% classic TN) were classified as BNI pain I-II (=painfree w/o medication). A BNI hypaesthesia II-III was present in 9.4% (n = 5) and BNI hypaesthesia IV in n = 2. Between groups analysis demonstrated no correlation of SRS responsiveness with age, gender, MS- or not MS-associated TN, previous surgery, framebased/frameless robotic SRS. DREZ targeting significantly better suppressed TN compared to RG targeting (p = 0.01). Additionally, a statistical trend for a better BNI pain outcome (p = 0.07) along with a significant increase in BNI hypaesthesia (p = 0.01) was found when using a larger partial trigeminal 70 Gy volume. CONCLUSION: Our retrospective analysis support LINAC SRS as an effective and safe treatment option in TN. Frameless robotic SRS of TN is safe when using a dedicated LINAC system. A target definition closer to the brainstem and tendencially a larger target volume were associated with a better outcome for pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6106738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61067382018-08-29 LINAC stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia –retrospective two-institutional examination of treatment outcomes Rashid, Ali Pintea, Bogdan Kinfe, Thomas M. Surber, Gunnar Hamm, Klaus Boström, Jan P. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: In this pooled 2-center series LINAC radiosurgery (SRS) has been applied as a treatment option for a subset of refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN) patients. This study approached to retrospectively assess the efficacy and safety of LINAC SRS and to provide a brief overview addressed to the technical development from frame-based towards frameless robotic SRS. METHODS: From 2001 to 2017 n = 55 patients (pts) were treated, n = 28 were female (51%), mean age: 66 years (range 36–93 years); TN etiology: 37 classic TN, 15 multiple sclerosis (MS)-related TN, 2 symptomatic TN, and 1 atypical TN. Previous treatment was present in n = 35 (63.6%) pts. (some multiple or combined) with n = 23 microsurgical vascular decompression and n = 17 percutaneous retrogasserian rhizotomy. A 6 MV LINAC (4–5 mm collimators) was applied in all pts. (n = 26 framebased - n = 29 frameless robotic). The dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) was targeted in n = 35 cases and the retrogasserian target in n = 20 pts. with a homogeneous dose for the entire study cohort (90 Gy). SRS outcome was measured using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) score for pain and hypaesthesia and statistically evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyzes. RESULTS: Mean follow-up (FU) was 30 months (2 lost FU); the total rate of post SRS BNI pain I-IIIa (=painfree w or w/o medication) was 69% (88% for the classic TN pts), 29% (38.8% classic TN) were classified as BNI pain I-II (=painfree w/o medication). A BNI hypaesthesia II-III was present in 9.4% (n = 5) and BNI hypaesthesia IV in n = 2. Between groups analysis demonstrated no correlation of SRS responsiveness with age, gender, MS- or not MS-associated TN, previous surgery, framebased/frameless robotic SRS. DREZ targeting significantly better suppressed TN compared to RG targeting (p = 0.01). Additionally, a statistical trend for a better BNI pain outcome (p = 0.07) along with a significant increase in BNI hypaesthesia (p = 0.01) was found when using a larger partial trigeminal 70 Gy volume. CONCLUSION: Our retrospective analysis support LINAC SRS as an effective and safe treatment option in TN. Frameless robotic SRS of TN is safe when using a dedicated LINAC system. A target definition closer to the brainstem and tendencially a larger target volume were associated with a better outcome for pain. BioMed Central 2018-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6106738/ /pubmed/30134992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1102-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Rashid, Ali
Pintea, Bogdan
Kinfe, Thomas M.
Surber, Gunnar
Hamm, Klaus
Boström, Jan P.
LINAC stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia –retrospective two-institutional examination of treatment outcomes
title LINAC stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia –retrospective two-institutional examination of treatment outcomes
title_full LINAC stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia –retrospective two-institutional examination of treatment outcomes
title_fullStr LINAC stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia –retrospective two-institutional examination of treatment outcomes
title_full_unstemmed LINAC stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia –retrospective two-institutional examination of treatment outcomes
title_short LINAC stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia –retrospective two-institutional examination of treatment outcomes
title_sort linac stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia –retrospective two-institutional examination of treatment outcomes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6106738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30134992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1102-2
work_keys_str_mv AT rashidali linacstereotacticradiosurgeryfortrigeminalneuralgiaretrospectivetwoinstitutionalexaminationoftreatmentoutcomes
AT pinteabogdan linacstereotacticradiosurgeryfortrigeminalneuralgiaretrospectivetwoinstitutionalexaminationoftreatmentoutcomes
AT kinfethomasm linacstereotacticradiosurgeryfortrigeminalneuralgiaretrospectivetwoinstitutionalexaminationoftreatmentoutcomes
AT surbergunnar linacstereotacticradiosurgeryfortrigeminalneuralgiaretrospectivetwoinstitutionalexaminationoftreatmentoutcomes
AT hammklaus linacstereotacticradiosurgeryfortrigeminalneuralgiaretrospectivetwoinstitutionalexaminationoftreatmentoutcomes
AT bostromjanp linacstereotacticradiosurgeryfortrigeminalneuralgiaretrospectivetwoinstitutionalexaminationoftreatmentoutcomes