Cargando…
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Progress in vitrification techniques has allowed reproductive physicians to consider new strategies for using progestin as an alternative to a GnRH analogue to improve in vitro fertilisation (IVF). However, the role of progestin in blocking luteinising hormone (LH) surges and its potenti...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6106816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30134964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2850-x |
_version_ | 1783349849600557056 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Yun Kuang, Yanping Chen, Qiuju Cai, Renfei |
author_facet | Wang, Yun Kuang, Yanping Chen, Qiuju Cai, Renfei |
author_sort | Wang, Yun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Progress in vitrification techniques has allowed reproductive physicians to consider new strategies for using progestin as an alternative to a GnRH analogue to improve in vitro fertilisation (IVF). However, the role of progestin in blocking luteinising hormone (LH) surges and its potential in clinical practice are unclear, especially for poor responders. We designed a prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) to compare the efficacy of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and progestin in blocking LH surges and premature ovulation in poor responders. METHODS/DESIGN: Poor responders who meet the Bologna criteria will be randomised to one of two stimulation regimens—gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist or progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS)—using a computer-generated random number. Fresh embryos were transferred in the GnRH antagonist group and frozen embryos were transferred in the PPOS group. The primary outcome is the incidence of premature LH surges. Secondary outcomes include the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of embryos available for transfer, implantation rates and clinical pregnancy. The sample size for this trial is estimated as 340 participants, with 170 participants in each group. The data analysis will be by intention to treat. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first RCT to examine the efficacy of administering progestin orally to block LH surges and premature ovulation compared with the GnRH antagonist protocols in poor responders undergoing IVF treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.chictr.org.cn. ChiCTR-IPR-17010906. Registered on 18 March 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2850-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6106816 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61068162018-08-29 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Wang, Yun Kuang, Yanping Chen, Qiuju Cai, Renfei Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Progress in vitrification techniques has allowed reproductive physicians to consider new strategies for using progestin as an alternative to a GnRH analogue to improve in vitro fertilisation (IVF). However, the role of progestin in blocking luteinising hormone (LH) surges and its potential in clinical practice are unclear, especially for poor responders. We designed a prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) to compare the efficacy of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and progestin in blocking LH surges and premature ovulation in poor responders. METHODS/DESIGN: Poor responders who meet the Bologna criteria will be randomised to one of two stimulation regimens—gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist or progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS)—using a computer-generated random number. Fresh embryos were transferred in the GnRH antagonist group and frozen embryos were transferred in the PPOS group. The primary outcome is the incidence of premature LH surges. Secondary outcomes include the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of embryos available for transfer, implantation rates and clinical pregnancy. The sample size for this trial is estimated as 340 participants, with 170 participants in each group. The data analysis will be by intention to treat. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first RCT to examine the efficacy of administering progestin orally to block LH surges and premature ovulation compared with the GnRH antagonist protocols in poor responders undergoing IVF treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.chictr.org.cn. ChiCTR-IPR-17010906. Registered on 18 March 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2850-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6106816/ /pubmed/30134964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2850-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Wang, Yun Kuang, Yanping Chen, Qiuju Cai, Renfei Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6106816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30134964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2850-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangyun gonadotropinreleasinghormoneantagonistversusprogestinforthepreventionofprematureluteinisinghormonesurgesinpoorrespondersundergoinginvitrofertilisationtreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kuangyanping gonadotropinreleasinghormoneantagonistversusprogestinforthepreventionofprematureluteinisinghormonesurgesinpoorrespondersundergoinginvitrofertilisationtreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT chenqiuju gonadotropinreleasinghormoneantagonistversusprogestinforthepreventionofprematureluteinisinghormonesurgesinpoorrespondersundergoinginvitrofertilisationtreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cairenfei gonadotropinreleasinghormoneantagonistversusprogestinforthepreventionofprematureluteinisinghormonesurgesinpoorrespondersundergoinginvitrofertilisationtreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |