Cargando…
Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
AIM: To compare gallstones removal rate and incidence of bleeding, pancreatitis, use of mechanical lithotripsy, cholangitis and perforation between isolated sphincterotomy vs sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation of papilla in choledocholithiasis through the meta-analysis of randomized cli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6107471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147845 http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v10.i8.130 |
_version_ | 1783349968635953152 |
---|---|
author | de Clemente Junior, Cesar Capel Bernardo, Wanderley Marques Franzini, Tomazo Prince Luz, Gustavo Oliveira dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera Cohen, Jonah Maxwell de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux Marinho, Fábio Ramalho Tavares Coronel, Martin Sakai, Paulo de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux |
author_facet | de Clemente Junior, Cesar Capel Bernardo, Wanderley Marques Franzini, Tomazo Prince Luz, Gustavo Oliveira dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera Cohen, Jonah Maxwell de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux Marinho, Fábio Ramalho Tavares Coronel, Martin Sakai, Paulo de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux |
author_sort | de Clemente Junior, Cesar Capel |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To compare gallstones removal rate and incidence of bleeding, pancreatitis, use of mechanical lithotripsy, cholangitis and perforation between isolated sphincterotomy vs sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation of papilla in choledocholithiasis through the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines. Literature search was restricted to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on MedLine, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and EMBASE database platforms in July 2017. The manual search included references of retrieved articles. We extracted data focusing on outcomes: The primary endpoint was the stones removal rate; Secondary endpoints were rates of pancreatitis, bleeding, use of mechanical lithotripsy (ML), perforation and cholangitis. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs with 1824 patients were included. EST was associated with more post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) bleeding [FE RD-0.02, CI (-0.03, -0.00), I(2) = 33%, P = 0.05] and more need of mechanical lithotripsy in general [RE RD-0.16, CI (-0.25, -0.06), I(2) = 90%, P = 0.002] and in subgroup analysis of stones greater than 15 mm [RE RD-0.20, CI (-0.38, -0.02), I(2) = 82%, P = 0.003]. Incidence of pancreatitis [FE RD-0.01, CI (-0.03, 0.01), I(2) = 0, P = 0.36], cholangitis [FE RD-0.00, CI (-0.01, 0.01), I(2) =0, P = 0.97] and perforation [FE RD-0.01, CI (-0.01, 0.00), I(2) = 0, P = 0.23] was similar between the groups as well as similar stone removal rates in general [FE RD-0.01, CI (-0.01, 0.04), I(2) = 0, P = 0.23] and pooled analysis of stones greater than 15 mm [FE RD-0.02, CI (-0.02, 0.07), I(2) = 11%, P = 0.31]. CONCLUSION: Through meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials we found that isolated sphincterotomy was associated with more post-ERCP bleeding and more need for mechanical lithotripsy. However, there was no statistical difference in the stone removal rate between isolated sphincterotomy and sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation in the approach to remove gallstones. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6107471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61074712018-08-24 Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials de Clemente Junior, Cesar Capel Bernardo, Wanderley Marques Franzini, Tomazo Prince Luz, Gustavo Oliveira dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera Cohen, Jonah Maxwell de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux Marinho, Fábio Ramalho Tavares Coronel, Martin Sakai, Paulo de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux World J Gastrointest Endosc Systematic Reviews AIM: To compare gallstones removal rate and incidence of bleeding, pancreatitis, use of mechanical lithotripsy, cholangitis and perforation between isolated sphincterotomy vs sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation of papilla in choledocholithiasis through the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines. Literature search was restricted to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on MedLine, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and EMBASE database platforms in July 2017. The manual search included references of retrieved articles. We extracted data focusing on outcomes: The primary endpoint was the stones removal rate; Secondary endpoints were rates of pancreatitis, bleeding, use of mechanical lithotripsy (ML), perforation and cholangitis. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs with 1824 patients were included. EST was associated with more post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) bleeding [FE RD-0.02, CI (-0.03, -0.00), I(2) = 33%, P = 0.05] and more need of mechanical lithotripsy in general [RE RD-0.16, CI (-0.25, -0.06), I(2) = 90%, P = 0.002] and in subgroup analysis of stones greater than 15 mm [RE RD-0.20, CI (-0.38, -0.02), I(2) = 82%, P = 0.003]. Incidence of pancreatitis [FE RD-0.01, CI (-0.03, 0.01), I(2) = 0, P = 0.36], cholangitis [FE RD-0.00, CI (-0.01, 0.01), I(2) =0, P = 0.97] and perforation [FE RD-0.01, CI (-0.01, 0.00), I(2) = 0, P = 0.23] was similar between the groups as well as similar stone removal rates in general [FE RD-0.01, CI (-0.01, 0.04), I(2) = 0, P = 0.23] and pooled analysis of stones greater than 15 mm [FE RD-0.02, CI (-0.02, 0.07), I(2) = 11%, P = 0.31]. CONCLUSION: Through meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials we found that isolated sphincterotomy was associated with more post-ERCP bleeding and more need for mechanical lithotripsy. However, there was no statistical difference in the stone removal rate between isolated sphincterotomy and sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation in the approach to remove gallstones. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018-08-16 2018-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6107471/ /pubmed/30147845 http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v10.i8.130 Text en ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews de Clemente Junior, Cesar Capel Bernardo, Wanderley Marques Franzini, Tomazo Prince Luz, Gustavo Oliveira dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera Cohen, Jonah Maxwell de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux Marinho, Fábio Ramalho Tavares Coronel, Martin Sakai, Paulo de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials |
title | Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6107471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147845 http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v10.i8.130 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT declementejuniorcesarcapel comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT bernardowanderleymarques comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT franzinitomazoprince comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT luzgustavooliveira comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT dossantosmarcoseduardolera comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT cohenjonahmaxwell comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT demouradiogoturianihourneaux comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT marinhofabioramalhotavares comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT coronelmartin comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT sakaipaulo comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT demouraeduardoguimaraeshourneaux comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials |