Cargando…

Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

AIM: To compare gallstones removal rate and incidence of bleeding, pancreatitis, use of mechanical lithotripsy, cholangitis and perforation between isolated sphincterotomy vs sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation of papilla in choledocholithiasis through the meta-analysis of randomized cli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Clemente Junior, Cesar Capel, Bernardo, Wanderley Marques, Franzini, Tomazo Prince, Luz, Gustavo Oliveira, dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera, Cohen, Jonah Maxwell, de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux, Marinho, Fábio Ramalho Tavares, Coronel, Martin, Sakai, Paulo, de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6107471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147845
http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v10.i8.130
_version_ 1783349968635953152
author de Clemente Junior, Cesar Capel
Bernardo, Wanderley Marques
Franzini, Tomazo Prince
Luz, Gustavo Oliveira
dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera
Cohen, Jonah Maxwell
de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux
Marinho, Fábio Ramalho Tavares
Coronel, Martin
Sakai, Paulo
de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux
author_facet de Clemente Junior, Cesar Capel
Bernardo, Wanderley Marques
Franzini, Tomazo Prince
Luz, Gustavo Oliveira
dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera
Cohen, Jonah Maxwell
de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux
Marinho, Fábio Ramalho Tavares
Coronel, Martin
Sakai, Paulo
de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux
author_sort de Clemente Junior, Cesar Capel
collection PubMed
description AIM: To compare gallstones removal rate and incidence of bleeding, pancreatitis, use of mechanical lithotripsy, cholangitis and perforation between isolated sphincterotomy vs sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation of papilla in choledocholithiasis through the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines. Literature search was restricted to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on MedLine, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and EMBASE database platforms in July 2017. The manual search included references of retrieved articles. We extracted data focusing on outcomes: The primary endpoint was the stones removal rate; Secondary endpoints were rates of pancreatitis, bleeding, use of mechanical lithotripsy (ML), perforation and cholangitis. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs with 1824 patients were included. EST was associated with more post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) bleeding [FE RD-0.02, CI (-0.03, -0.00), I(2) = 33%, P = 0.05] and more need of mechanical lithotripsy in general [RE RD-0.16, CI (-0.25, -0.06), I(2) = 90%, P = 0.002] and in subgroup analysis of stones greater than 15 mm [RE RD-0.20, CI (-0.38, -0.02), I(2) = 82%, P = 0.003]. Incidence of pancreatitis [FE RD-0.01, CI (-0.03, 0.01), I(2) = 0, P = 0.36], cholangitis [FE RD-0.00, CI (-0.01, 0.01), I(2) =0, P = 0.97] and perforation [FE RD-0.01, CI (-0.01, 0.00), I(2) = 0, P = 0.23] was similar between the groups as well as similar stone removal rates in general [FE RD-0.01, CI (-0.01, 0.04), I(2) = 0, P = 0.23] and pooled analysis of stones greater than 15 mm [FE RD-0.02, CI (-0.02, 0.07), I(2) = 11%, P = 0.31]. CONCLUSION: Through meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials we found that isolated sphincterotomy was associated with more post-ERCP bleeding and more need for mechanical lithotripsy. However, there was no statistical difference in the stone removal rate between isolated sphincterotomy and sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation in the approach to remove gallstones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6107471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61074712018-08-24 Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials de Clemente Junior, Cesar Capel Bernardo, Wanderley Marques Franzini, Tomazo Prince Luz, Gustavo Oliveira dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera Cohen, Jonah Maxwell de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux Marinho, Fábio Ramalho Tavares Coronel, Martin Sakai, Paulo de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux World J Gastrointest Endosc Systematic Reviews AIM: To compare gallstones removal rate and incidence of bleeding, pancreatitis, use of mechanical lithotripsy, cholangitis and perforation between isolated sphincterotomy vs sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation of papilla in choledocholithiasis through the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines. Literature search was restricted to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on MedLine, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and EMBASE database platforms in July 2017. The manual search included references of retrieved articles. We extracted data focusing on outcomes: The primary endpoint was the stones removal rate; Secondary endpoints were rates of pancreatitis, bleeding, use of mechanical lithotripsy (ML), perforation and cholangitis. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs with 1824 patients were included. EST was associated with more post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) bleeding [FE RD-0.02, CI (-0.03, -0.00), I(2) = 33%, P = 0.05] and more need of mechanical lithotripsy in general [RE RD-0.16, CI (-0.25, -0.06), I(2) = 90%, P = 0.002] and in subgroup analysis of stones greater than 15 mm [RE RD-0.20, CI (-0.38, -0.02), I(2) = 82%, P = 0.003]. Incidence of pancreatitis [FE RD-0.01, CI (-0.03, 0.01), I(2) = 0, P = 0.36], cholangitis [FE RD-0.00, CI (-0.01, 0.01), I(2) =0, P = 0.97] and perforation [FE RD-0.01, CI (-0.01, 0.00), I(2) = 0, P = 0.23] was similar between the groups as well as similar stone removal rates in general [FE RD-0.01, CI (-0.01, 0.04), I(2) = 0, P = 0.23] and pooled analysis of stones greater than 15 mm [FE RD-0.02, CI (-0.02, 0.07), I(2) = 11%, P = 0.31]. CONCLUSION: Through meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials we found that isolated sphincterotomy was associated with more post-ERCP bleeding and more need for mechanical lithotripsy. However, there was no statistical difference in the stone removal rate between isolated sphincterotomy and sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation in the approach to remove gallstones. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018-08-16 2018-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6107471/ /pubmed/30147845 http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v10.i8.130 Text en ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
de Clemente Junior, Cesar Capel
Bernardo, Wanderley Marques
Franzini, Tomazo Prince
Luz, Gustavo Oliveira
dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera
Cohen, Jonah Maxwell
de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux
Marinho, Fábio Ramalho Tavares
Coronel, Martin
Sakai, Paulo
de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux
Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
title Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
title_full Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
title_short Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
title_sort comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy vs endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6107471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147845
http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v10.i8.130
work_keys_str_mv AT declementejuniorcesarcapel comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT bernardowanderleymarques comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT franzinitomazoprince comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT luzgustavooliveira comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT dossantosmarcoseduardolera comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT cohenjonahmaxwell comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT demouradiogoturianihourneaux comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT marinhofabioramalhotavares comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT coronelmartin comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sakaipaulo comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT demouraeduardoguimaraeshourneaux comparisonbetweenendoscopicsphincterotomyvsendoscopicsphincterotomyassociatedwithballoondilationforremovalofbileductstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisbasedonrandomizedcontrolledtrials