Cargando…

Prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation

Arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) cause intensive treatment costs. Left atrial electro-anatomical remodeling measured as low voltage areas (LVA) during catheter ablation indicates advanced disease stage and is associated with poor ablation success. The aim of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kornej, Jelena, Schumacher, Katja, Dinov, Borislav, Kosich, Falco, Sommer, Philipp, Arya, Arash, Husser, Daniela, Bollmann, Andreas, Lip, Gregory Y. H., Hindricks, Gerhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6107514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30139967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31133-x
_version_ 1783349977577160704
author Kornej, Jelena
Schumacher, Katja
Dinov, Borislav
Kosich, Falco
Sommer, Philipp
Arya, Arash
Husser, Daniela
Bollmann, Andreas
Lip, Gregory Y. H.
Hindricks, Gerhard
author_facet Kornej, Jelena
Schumacher, Katja
Dinov, Borislav
Kosich, Falco
Sommer, Philipp
Arya, Arash
Husser, Daniela
Bollmann, Andreas
Lip, Gregory Y. H.
Hindricks, Gerhard
author_sort Kornej, Jelena
collection PubMed
description Arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) cause intensive treatment costs. Left atrial electro-anatomical remodeling measured as low voltage areas (LVA) during catheter ablation indicates advanced disease stage and is associated with poor ablation success. The aim of this study was to analyze the prediction of LVA and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores. APPLE, DR-FLASH scores were calculated at baseline and MB-LATER at 3 months post-ablation in AF patients undergoing first catheter ablation. LVA was determined using high-density maps and defined as <0.5 mV. Early (ERAF, <3 months) and late (LRAF, 3–12 months) were analyzed during follow-up. The study population included 241 patients (age 64 ± 11 years, 59% males, 59% persistent AF, 27% LVA, 27% LRAF). LVA were significantly associated with recurrences (OR 2.081, p = 0.026). While on univariable analysis, all scores were significantly associated with LVA, on multivariable analysis only APPLE (OR 1.789, p < 0.001) and DR-FLASH (OR 2.144, p < 0.001) remained significant predictors. However, MB-LATER (OR 1.445, p = 0.034) and ERAF (OR 5.078, p < 0.001) remained associated with LRAF on the multivariable analysis. These results were validated in a subgroup of 873 patients (age 61 ± 10, 63% males, 39% persistent AF, 34% LRAF, 27% LVA) from The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry. All scores were significantly associated with recurrences. However, ERAF was the most powerful predictor for later rhythm outcomes. Summarizing, a clinical score useful for prediction for both LVA and rhythm outcomes in AF patients remains a clinical unmet need.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6107514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61075142018-08-28 Prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation Kornej, Jelena Schumacher, Katja Dinov, Borislav Kosich, Falco Sommer, Philipp Arya, Arash Husser, Daniela Bollmann, Andreas Lip, Gregory Y. H. Hindricks, Gerhard Sci Rep Article Arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) cause intensive treatment costs. Left atrial electro-anatomical remodeling measured as low voltage areas (LVA) during catheter ablation indicates advanced disease stage and is associated with poor ablation success. The aim of this study was to analyze the prediction of LVA and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores. APPLE, DR-FLASH scores were calculated at baseline and MB-LATER at 3 months post-ablation in AF patients undergoing first catheter ablation. LVA was determined using high-density maps and defined as <0.5 mV. Early (ERAF, <3 months) and late (LRAF, 3–12 months) were analyzed during follow-up. The study population included 241 patients (age 64 ± 11 years, 59% males, 59% persistent AF, 27% LVA, 27% LRAF). LVA were significantly associated with recurrences (OR 2.081, p = 0.026). While on univariable analysis, all scores were significantly associated with LVA, on multivariable analysis only APPLE (OR 1.789, p < 0.001) and DR-FLASH (OR 2.144, p < 0.001) remained significant predictors. However, MB-LATER (OR 1.445, p = 0.034) and ERAF (OR 5.078, p < 0.001) remained associated with LRAF on the multivariable analysis. These results were validated in a subgroup of 873 patients (age 61 ± 10, 63% males, 39% persistent AF, 34% LRAF, 27% LVA) from The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry. All scores were significantly associated with recurrences. However, ERAF was the most powerful predictor for later rhythm outcomes. Summarizing, a clinical score useful for prediction for both LVA and rhythm outcomes in AF patients remains a clinical unmet need. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6107514/ /pubmed/30139967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31133-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Kornej, Jelena
Schumacher, Katja
Dinov, Borislav
Kosich, Falco
Sommer, Philipp
Arya, Arash
Husser, Daniela
Bollmann, Andreas
Lip, Gregory Y. H.
Hindricks, Gerhard
Prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation
title Prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation
title_full Prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation
title_fullStr Prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation
title_short Prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation
title_sort prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using apple, dr-flash and mb-later scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6107514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30139967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31133-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kornejjelena predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation
AT schumacherkatja predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation
AT dinovborislav predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation
AT kosichfalco predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation
AT sommerphilipp predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation
AT aryaarash predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation
AT husserdaniela predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation
AT bollmannandreas predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation
AT lipgregoryyh predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation
AT hindricksgerhard predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation