Cargando…
Prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation
Arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) cause intensive treatment costs. Left atrial electro-anatomical remodeling measured as low voltage areas (LVA) during catheter ablation indicates advanced disease stage and is associated with poor ablation success. The aim of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6107514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30139967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31133-x |
_version_ | 1783349977577160704 |
---|---|
author | Kornej, Jelena Schumacher, Katja Dinov, Borislav Kosich, Falco Sommer, Philipp Arya, Arash Husser, Daniela Bollmann, Andreas Lip, Gregory Y. H. Hindricks, Gerhard |
author_facet | Kornej, Jelena Schumacher, Katja Dinov, Borislav Kosich, Falco Sommer, Philipp Arya, Arash Husser, Daniela Bollmann, Andreas Lip, Gregory Y. H. Hindricks, Gerhard |
author_sort | Kornej, Jelena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) cause intensive treatment costs. Left atrial electro-anatomical remodeling measured as low voltage areas (LVA) during catheter ablation indicates advanced disease stage and is associated with poor ablation success. The aim of this study was to analyze the prediction of LVA and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores. APPLE, DR-FLASH scores were calculated at baseline and MB-LATER at 3 months post-ablation in AF patients undergoing first catheter ablation. LVA was determined using high-density maps and defined as <0.5 mV. Early (ERAF, <3 months) and late (LRAF, 3–12 months) were analyzed during follow-up. The study population included 241 patients (age 64 ± 11 years, 59% males, 59% persistent AF, 27% LVA, 27% LRAF). LVA were significantly associated with recurrences (OR 2.081, p = 0.026). While on univariable analysis, all scores were significantly associated with LVA, on multivariable analysis only APPLE (OR 1.789, p < 0.001) and DR-FLASH (OR 2.144, p < 0.001) remained significant predictors. However, MB-LATER (OR 1.445, p = 0.034) and ERAF (OR 5.078, p < 0.001) remained associated with LRAF on the multivariable analysis. These results were validated in a subgroup of 873 patients (age 61 ± 10, 63% males, 39% persistent AF, 34% LRAF, 27% LVA) from The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry. All scores were significantly associated with recurrences. However, ERAF was the most powerful predictor for later rhythm outcomes. Summarizing, a clinical score useful for prediction for both LVA and rhythm outcomes in AF patients remains a clinical unmet need. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6107514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61075142018-08-28 Prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation Kornej, Jelena Schumacher, Katja Dinov, Borislav Kosich, Falco Sommer, Philipp Arya, Arash Husser, Daniela Bollmann, Andreas Lip, Gregory Y. H. Hindricks, Gerhard Sci Rep Article Arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) cause intensive treatment costs. Left atrial electro-anatomical remodeling measured as low voltage areas (LVA) during catheter ablation indicates advanced disease stage and is associated with poor ablation success. The aim of this study was to analyze the prediction of LVA and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores. APPLE, DR-FLASH scores were calculated at baseline and MB-LATER at 3 months post-ablation in AF patients undergoing first catheter ablation. LVA was determined using high-density maps and defined as <0.5 mV. Early (ERAF, <3 months) and late (LRAF, 3–12 months) were analyzed during follow-up. The study population included 241 patients (age 64 ± 11 years, 59% males, 59% persistent AF, 27% LVA, 27% LRAF). LVA were significantly associated with recurrences (OR 2.081, p = 0.026). While on univariable analysis, all scores were significantly associated with LVA, on multivariable analysis only APPLE (OR 1.789, p < 0.001) and DR-FLASH (OR 2.144, p < 0.001) remained significant predictors. However, MB-LATER (OR 1.445, p = 0.034) and ERAF (OR 5.078, p < 0.001) remained associated with LRAF on the multivariable analysis. These results were validated in a subgroup of 873 patients (age 61 ± 10, 63% males, 39% persistent AF, 34% LRAF, 27% LVA) from The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry. All scores were significantly associated with recurrences. However, ERAF was the most powerful predictor for later rhythm outcomes. Summarizing, a clinical score useful for prediction for both LVA and rhythm outcomes in AF patients remains a clinical unmet need. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6107514/ /pubmed/30139967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31133-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Kornej, Jelena Schumacher, Katja Dinov, Borislav Kosich, Falco Sommer, Philipp Arya, Arash Husser, Daniela Bollmann, Andreas Lip, Gregory Y. H. Hindricks, Gerhard Prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation |
title | Prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation |
title_full | Prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation |
title_fullStr | Prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation |
title_short | Prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation |
title_sort | prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using apple, dr-flash and mb-later scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6107514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30139967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31133-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kornejjelena predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation AT schumacherkatja predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation AT dinovborislav predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation AT kosichfalco predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation AT sommerphilipp predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation AT aryaarash predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation AT husserdaniela predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation AT bollmannandreas predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation AT lipgregoryyh predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation AT hindricksgerhard predictionofelectroanatomicalsubstrateandarrhythmiarecurrencesusingappledrflashandmblaterscoresinpatientswithatrialfibrillationundergoingcatheterablation |