Cargando…

Study protocol for a controlled trial of an eHealth system utilising patient reported outcome measures for personalised treatment and care: PROMPT-Care 2.0

BACKGROUND: Routine assessment and clinical utilisation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures can lead to improved patient outcomes. The PROMPT-Care eHealth system facilitates PRO data capture from cancer patients, data linkage and retrieval to support clinical decisions, patient self-managemen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Girgis, Afaf, Durcinoska, Ivana, Gerges, Martha, Kaadan, Nasreen, Arnold, Anthony, Descallar, Joseph, Delaney, Geoff P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6107942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30139331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4729-3
_version_ 1783350057009938432
author Girgis, Afaf
Durcinoska, Ivana
Gerges, Martha
Kaadan, Nasreen
Arnold, Anthony
Descallar, Joseph
Delaney, Geoff P.
author_facet Girgis, Afaf
Durcinoska, Ivana
Gerges, Martha
Kaadan, Nasreen
Arnold, Anthony
Descallar, Joseph
Delaney, Geoff P.
author_sort Girgis, Afaf
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Routine assessment and clinical utilisation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures can lead to improved patient outcomes. The PROMPT-Care eHealth system facilitates PRO data capture from cancer patients, data linkage and retrieval to support clinical decisions, patient self-management, and shared care. Pilot testing demonstrated acceptability and feasibility of PROMPT-Care Version 1.0. This study aims to implement PROMPT-Care Version 2.0 and determine its efficacy in reducing emergency department (ED) presentations, and improving chemotherapy delivery and health service referrals, compared to usual care. METHODS: Groups eligible to participate in the intervention arm of this controlled trial are patients receiving cancer care (including follow-up). PROMPT-Care patients will complete monthly assessments (distress, symptoms, unmet needs) until voluntary withdrawal or death. In Version 1.0, the care team accessed patients’ clinical feedback reports in ‘real time’ to guide their care, and patients received links to support their self-management, tailored to their PRO responses. Version 2.0 was extended to include: i) an additional alert system notifying the care team of ongoing unresolved clinical issues, ii) patient self-management resources, and iii) an auto-populated Treatment Summary and Survivorship Care Plan (SCP). The control population will be patients extracted from hospital databases of the general cancer patient population who were seen at the participating cancer therapy centres during the study period, with a ratio of 1:4 of intervention to control patients. A minimum sample size of 1760 (352 intervention and 1408 control) patients will detect a 14% reduction in the number of ED presentations (primary outcome) in the PROMPT-Care group compared with the control group. Intervention patients will provide feedback on system usability and value of the self-management materials; oncology staff will provide feedback on usefulness of PROMPT-Care reports, response to clinical alerts, impact on routine care, and usefulness of the SCPs; and GPs will provide feedback on the usefulness of the SCPs and attitudes towards shared-care models of survivorship care planning. DISCUSSION: This study will inform the PROMPT-Care system’s impact on healthcare utilisation and utility as an alternative model for ongoing supportive care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000615482) on 12th May 2016 (www.anzctr.org.au).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6107942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61079422018-08-29 Study protocol for a controlled trial of an eHealth system utilising patient reported outcome measures for personalised treatment and care: PROMPT-Care 2.0 Girgis, Afaf Durcinoska, Ivana Gerges, Martha Kaadan, Nasreen Arnold, Anthony Descallar, Joseph Delaney, Geoff P. BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Routine assessment and clinical utilisation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures can lead to improved patient outcomes. The PROMPT-Care eHealth system facilitates PRO data capture from cancer patients, data linkage and retrieval to support clinical decisions, patient self-management, and shared care. Pilot testing demonstrated acceptability and feasibility of PROMPT-Care Version 1.0. This study aims to implement PROMPT-Care Version 2.0 and determine its efficacy in reducing emergency department (ED) presentations, and improving chemotherapy delivery and health service referrals, compared to usual care. METHODS: Groups eligible to participate in the intervention arm of this controlled trial are patients receiving cancer care (including follow-up). PROMPT-Care patients will complete monthly assessments (distress, symptoms, unmet needs) until voluntary withdrawal or death. In Version 1.0, the care team accessed patients’ clinical feedback reports in ‘real time’ to guide their care, and patients received links to support their self-management, tailored to their PRO responses. Version 2.0 was extended to include: i) an additional alert system notifying the care team of ongoing unresolved clinical issues, ii) patient self-management resources, and iii) an auto-populated Treatment Summary and Survivorship Care Plan (SCP). The control population will be patients extracted from hospital databases of the general cancer patient population who were seen at the participating cancer therapy centres during the study period, with a ratio of 1:4 of intervention to control patients. A minimum sample size of 1760 (352 intervention and 1408 control) patients will detect a 14% reduction in the number of ED presentations (primary outcome) in the PROMPT-Care group compared with the control group. Intervention patients will provide feedback on system usability and value of the self-management materials; oncology staff will provide feedback on usefulness of PROMPT-Care reports, response to clinical alerts, impact on routine care, and usefulness of the SCPs; and GPs will provide feedback on the usefulness of the SCPs and attitudes towards shared-care models of survivorship care planning. DISCUSSION: This study will inform the PROMPT-Care system’s impact on healthcare utilisation and utility as an alternative model for ongoing supportive care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000615482) on 12th May 2016 (www.anzctr.org.au). BioMed Central 2018-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6107942/ /pubmed/30139331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4729-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Girgis, Afaf
Durcinoska, Ivana
Gerges, Martha
Kaadan, Nasreen
Arnold, Anthony
Descallar, Joseph
Delaney, Geoff P.
Study protocol for a controlled trial of an eHealth system utilising patient reported outcome measures for personalised treatment and care: PROMPT-Care 2.0
title Study protocol for a controlled trial of an eHealth system utilising patient reported outcome measures for personalised treatment and care: PROMPT-Care 2.0
title_full Study protocol for a controlled trial of an eHealth system utilising patient reported outcome measures for personalised treatment and care: PROMPT-Care 2.0
title_fullStr Study protocol for a controlled trial of an eHealth system utilising patient reported outcome measures for personalised treatment and care: PROMPT-Care 2.0
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for a controlled trial of an eHealth system utilising patient reported outcome measures for personalised treatment and care: PROMPT-Care 2.0
title_short Study protocol for a controlled trial of an eHealth system utilising patient reported outcome measures for personalised treatment and care: PROMPT-Care 2.0
title_sort study protocol for a controlled trial of an ehealth system utilising patient reported outcome measures for personalised treatment and care: prompt-care 2.0
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6107942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30139331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4729-3
work_keys_str_mv AT girgisafaf studyprotocolforacontrolledtrialofanehealthsystemutilisingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpersonalisedtreatmentandcarepromptcare20
AT durcinoskaivana studyprotocolforacontrolledtrialofanehealthsystemutilisingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpersonalisedtreatmentandcarepromptcare20
AT gergesmartha studyprotocolforacontrolledtrialofanehealthsystemutilisingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpersonalisedtreatmentandcarepromptcare20
AT kaadannasreen studyprotocolforacontrolledtrialofanehealthsystemutilisingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpersonalisedtreatmentandcarepromptcare20
AT arnoldanthony studyprotocolforacontrolledtrialofanehealthsystemutilisingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpersonalisedtreatmentandcarepromptcare20
AT descallarjoseph studyprotocolforacontrolledtrialofanehealthsystemutilisingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpersonalisedtreatmentandcarepromptcare20
AT delaneygeoffp studyprotocolforacontrolledtrialofanehealthsystemutilisingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpersonalisedtreatmentandcarepromptcare20
AT studyprotocolforacontrolledtrialofanehealthsystemutilisingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpersonalisedtreatmentandcarepromptcare20