Cargando…

Tree frog attachment: mechanisms, challenges, and perspectives

Tree frogs have the remarkable ability to attach to smooth, rough, dry, and wet surfaces using their versatile toe pads. Tree frog attachment involves the secretion of mucus into the pad-substrate gap, requiring adaptations towards mucus drainage and pad lubrication. Here, we present an overview of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langowski, Julian K. A., Dodou, Dimitra, Kamperman, Marleen, van Leeuwen, Johan L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6107968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30154908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12983-018-0273-x
_version_ 1783350063208071168
author Langowski, Julian K. A.
Dodou, Dimitra
Kamperman, Marleen
van Leeuwen, Johan L.
author_facet Langowski, Julian K. A.
Dodou, Dimitra
Kamperman, Marleen
van Leeuwen, Johan L.
author_sort Langowski, Julian K. A.
collection PubMed
description Tree frogs have the remarkable ability to attach to smooth, rough, dry, and wet surfaces using their versatile toe pads. Tree frog attachment involves the secretion of mucus into the pad-substrate gap, requiring adaptations towards mucus drainage and pad lubrication. Here, we present an overview of tree frog attachment, with focus on (i) the morphology and material of the toe pad; (ii) the functional demands on the toe pad arising from ecology, lifestyle, and phylogenetics; (iii) experimental data of attachment performance such as adhesion and friction forces; and (iv) potential perspectives on future developments in the field. By revisiting reported data and observations, we discuss the involved mechanisms of attachment and propose new hypotheses for further research. Among others, we address the following questions: Do capillary and hydrodynamic forces explain the strong friction of the toe pads directly, or indirectly by promoting dry attachment mechanisms? If friction primarily relies on van der Waals (vdW) forces instead, how much do these forces contribute to adhesion in the wet environment tree frogs live in and what role does the mucus play? We show that both pad morphology and measured attachment performance suggest the coaction of several attachment mechanisms (e.g. capillary and hydrodynamic adhesion, mechanical interlocking, and vdW forces) with situation-dependent relative importance. Current analytical models of capillary and hydrodynamic adhesion, caused by the secreted mucus and by environmental liquids, do not capture the contributions of these mechanisms in a comprehensive and accurate way. We argue that the soft pad material and a hierarchical surface pattern on the ventral pad surface enhance the effective contact area and facilitate gap-closure by macro- to nanoscopic drainage of interstitial liquids, which may give rise to a significant contribution of vdW interactions to tree frog attachment. Increasing the comprehension of the complex mechanism of tree frog attachment contributes to a better understanding of other biological attachment systems (e.g. in geckos and insects) and is expected to stimulate the development of a wide array of bioinspired adhesive applications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12983-018-0273-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6107968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61079682018-08-28 Tree frog attachment: mechanisms, challenges, and perspectives Langowski, Julian K. A. Dodou, Dimitra Kamperman, Marleen van Leeuwen, Johan L. Front Zool Review Tree frogs have the remarkable ability to attach to smooth, rough, dry, and wet surfaces using their versatile toe pads. Tree frog attachment involves the secretion of mucus into the pad-substrate gap, requiring adaptations towards mucus drainage and pad lubrication. Here, we present an overview of tree frog attachment, with focus on (i) the morphology and material of the toe pad; (ii) the functional demands on the toe pad arising from ecology, lifestyle, and phylogenetics; (iii) experimental data of attachment performance such as adhesion and friction forces; and (iv) potential perspectives on future developments in the field. By revisiting reported data and observations, we discuss the involved mechanisms of attachment and propose new hypotheses for further research. Among others, we address the following questions: Do capillary and hydrodynamic forces explain the strong friction of the toe pads directly, or indirectly by promoting dry attachment mechanisms? If friction primarily relies on van der Waals (vdW) forces instead, how much do these forces contribute to adhesion in the wet environment tree frogs live in and what role does the mucus play? We show that both pad morphology and measured attachment performance suggest the coaction of several attachment mechanisms (e.g. capillary and hydrodynamic adhesion, mechanical interlocking, and vdW forces) with situation-dependent relative importance. Current analytical models of capillary and hydrodynamic adhesion, caused by the secreted mucus and by environmental liquids, do not capture the contributions of these mechanisms in a comprehensive and accurate way. We argue that the soft pad material and a hierarchical surface pattern on the ventral pad surface enhance the effective contact area and facilitate gap-closure by macro- to nanoscopic drainage of interstitial liquids, which may give rise to a significant contribution of vdW interactions to tree frog attachment. Increasing the comprehension of the complex mechanism of tree frog attachment contributes to a better understanding of other biological attachment systems (e.g. in geckos and insects) and is expected to stimulate the development of a wide array of bioinspired adhesive applications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12983-018-0273-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6107968/ /pubmed/30154908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12983-018-0273-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Langowski, Julian K. A.
Dodou, Dimitra
Kamperman, Marleen
van Leeuwen, Johan L.
Tree frog attachment: mechanisms, challenges, and perspectives
title Tree frog attachment: mechanisms, challenges, and perspectives
title_full Tree frog attachment: mechanisms, challenges, and perspectives
title_fullStr Tree frog attachment: mechanisms, challenges, and perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Tree frog attachment: mechanisms, challenges, and perspectives
title_short Tree frog attachment: mechanisms, challenges, and perspectives
title_sort tree frog attachment: mechanisms, challenges, and perspectives
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6107968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30154908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12983-018-0273-x
work_keys_str_mv AT langowskijulianka treefrogattachmentmechanismschallengesandperspectives
AT dodoudimitra treefrogattachmentmechanismschallengesandperspectives
AT kampermanmarleen treefrogattachmentmechanismschallengesandperspectives
AT vanleeuwenjohanl treefrogattachmentmechanismschallengesandperspectives