Cargando…

Voices for food: methodologies for implementing a multi-state community-based intervention in rural, high poverty communities

BACKGROUND: Rural communities experience unique barriers to food access when compared to urban areas and food security is a public health issue in rural, high poverty communities. A multi-leveled socio-ecological intervention to develop food policy councils (FPCs), and improve food security in rural...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stluka, Suzanne, Moore, Lindsay, Eicher-Miller, Heather A., Franzen-Castle, Lisa, Henne, Becky, Mehrle, Donna, Remley, Daniel, McCormack, Lacey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6108119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30139336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5957-9
_version_ 1783350088931737600
author Stluka, Suzanne
Moore, Lindsay
Eicher-Miller, Heather A.
Franzen-Castle, Lisa
Henne, Becky
Mehrle, Donna
Remley, Daniel
McCormack, Lacey
author_facet Stluka, Suzanne
Moore, Lindsay
Eicher-Miller, Heather A.
Franzen-Castle, Lisa
Henne, Becky
Mehrle, Donna
Remley, Daniel
McCormack, Lacey
author_sort Stluka, Suzanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rural communities experience unique barriers to food access when compared to urban areas and food security is a public health issue in rural, high poverty communities. A multi-leveled socio-ecological intervention to develop food policy councils (FPCs), and improve food security in rural communities was created. Methods to carry out such an intervention were developed and are described. METHODS: A longitudinal, matched treatment and comparison study was conducted in 24 rural, high poverty counties in South Dakota, Indiana, Missouri, Michigan, Nebraska and Ohio. Counties were assigned to a treatment (n = 12) or comparison (n = 12) group. Intervention activities focus on three key components that impact food security: 1) community coaching by Extension Educators/field staff, 2) FPC development, and 3) development of a MyChoice food pantry. Community coaching was only provided to intervention counties. Evaluation components focus on three levels of the intervention: 1) Community (FPCs), 2) Food Pantry Organization, and 3) Pantry Client & Families. Participants in this study were community stakeholders, food pantry directors, staff/volunteers and food pantry clients. Pantry food access/availability including pantry food quality and quantity, household food security and pantry client dietary intake are dependent variables. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide a framework for utilizing a multi-leveled socio-ecological intervention with the purpose of improving food security in rural, high poverty communities. Additionally, the results of this study will yield evidence-based best practices and tools for both FPC development and the transition to a guided-client choice model of distribution in food pantries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03566095. Retrospectively registered on June, 21, 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6108119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61081192018-08-28 Voices for food: methodologies for implementing a multi-state community-based intervention in rural, high poverty communities Stluka, Suzanne Moore, Lindsay Eicher-Miller, Heather A. Franzen-Castle, Lisa Henne, Becky Mehrle, Donna Remley, Daniel McCormack, Lacey BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Rural communities experience unique barriers to food access when compared to urban areas and food security is a public health issue in rural, high poverty communities. A multi-leveled socio-ecological intervention to develop food policy councils (FPCs), and improve food security in rural communities was created. Methods to carry out such an intervention were developed and are described. METHODS: A longitudinal, matched treatment and comparison study was conducted in 24 rural, high poverty counties in South Dakota, Indiana, Missouri, Michigan, Nebraska and Ohio. Counties were assigned to a treatment (n = 12) or comparison (n = 12) group. Intervention activities focus on three key components that impact food security: 1) community coaching by Extension Educators/field staff, 2) FPC development, and 3) development of a MyChoice food pantry. Community coaching was only provided to intervention counties. Evaluation components focus on three levels of the intervention: 1) Community (FPCs), 2) Food Pantry Organization, and 3) Pantry Client & Families. Participants in this study were community stakeholders, food pantry directors, staff/volunteers and food pantry clients. Pantry food access/availability including pantry food quality and quantity, household food security and pantry client dietary intake are dependent variables. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide a framework for utilizing a multi-leveled socio-ecological intervention with the purpose of improving food security in rural, high poverty communities. Additionally, the results of this study will yield evidence-based best practices and tools for both FPC development and the transition to a guided-client choice model of distribution in food pantries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03566095. Retrospectively registered on June, 21, 2018. BioMed Central 2018-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6108119/ /pubmed/30139336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5957-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Stluka, Suzanne
Moore, Lindsay
Eicher-Miller, Heather A.
Franzen-Castle, Lisa
Henne, Becky
Mehrle, Donna
Remley, Daniel
McCormack, Lacey
Voices for food: methodologies for implementing a multi-state community-based intervention in rural, high poverty communities
title Voices for food: methodologies for implementing a multi-state community-based intervention in rural, high poverty communities
title_full Voices for food: methodologies for implementing a multi-state community-based intervention in rural, high poverty communities
title_fullStr Voices for food: methodologies for implementing a multi-state community-based intervention in rural, high poverty communities
title_full_unstemmed Voices for food: methodologies for implementing a multi-state community-based intervention in rural, high poverty communities
title_short Voices for food: methodologies for implementing a multi-state community-based intervention in rural, high poverty communities
title_sort voices for food: methodologies for implementing a multi-state community-based intervention in rural, high poverty communities
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6108119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30139336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5957-9
work_keys_str_mv AT stlukasuzanne voicesforfoodmethodologiesforimplementingamultistatecommunitybasedinterventioninruralhighpovertycommunities
AT moorelindsay voicesforfoodmethodologiesforimplementingamultistatecommunitybasedinterventioninruralhighpovertycommunities
AT eichermillerheathera voicesforfoodmethodologiesforimplementingamultistatecommunitybasedinterventioninruralhighpovertycommunities
AT franzencastlelisa voicesforfoodmethodologiesforimplementingamultistatecommunitybasedinterventioninruralhighpovertycommunities
AT hennebecky voicesforfoodmethodologiesforimplementingamultistatecommunitybasedinterventioninruralhighpovertycommunities
AT mehrledonna voicesforfoodmethodologiesforimplementingamultistatecommunitybasedinterventioninruralhighpovertycommunities
AT remleydaniel voicesforfoodmethodologiesforimplementingamultistatecommunitybasedinterventioninruralhighpovertycommunities
AT mccormacklacey voicesforfoodmethodologiesforimplementingamultistatecommunitybasedinterventioninruralhighpovertycommunities