Cargando…

Primary development and validation of a quantitative health policy impact assessment tool (HEPIAT): The case of Iranian targeted subsidy plan

Background: As a primary phase of a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) on the Iranian Targeted Subsidy Plan (TSP), this study was conducted to assess the psychometric properties of a newly developed quantitative Health Policy Impact Assessment Tool (HEPIAT). Methods: In 2014, multistage cluster sampling...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nadrian, Haidar, Babazadeh, Towhid, Nadrian, Nadia, Mahmoodi, Hassan, Khosravi, Anvar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6108262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30159273
http://dx.doi.org/10.14196/mjiri.32.22
_version_ 1783350118101024768
author Nadrian, Haidar
Babazadeh, Towhid
Nadrian, Nadia
Mahmoodi, Hassan
Khosravi, Anvar
author_facet Nadrian, Haidar
Babazadeh, Towhid
Nadrian, Nadia
Mahmoodi, Hassan
Khosravi, Anvar
author_sort Nadrian, Haidar
collection PubMed
description Background: As a primary phase of a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) on the Iranian Targeted Subsidy Plan (TSP), this study was conducted to assess the psychometric properties of a newly developed quantitative Health Policy Impact Assessment Tool (HEPIAT). Methods: In 2014, multistage cluster sampling was employed to recruit 509 key informants in Sanandaj, Iran, to participate in this cross-sectional study. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to develop the initial draft of HEPIAT. Content validity was determined by a consensus panel of experts, and construct validity and factor structure of the HEPIAT were assessed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). Reliability was assessed utilizing the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and the test– retest reliability coefficient. Results: Applying EFA, the optimal solution including 35 items and 6 factors was emerged, which accounted for 64.94% of the total variance. The mean items’ relevancy, clarity, simplicity, and their total mean±SD score were 88.3±0.2, 90.1±0.5, 86.1±0.7, and 89.6±0.4, respectively. The scores of intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and internal consistency reliability for all the factors were ranged from 0.67 to 0.89. HEPIAT demonstrated an appropriate validity, reliability, functionality, and simplicity. Conclusion: Although further works in different settings are warranted, HEPIAT may be a practical and useful quantitative instrument in socioeconomic-related HIAs aimed to inform policymakers and stakeholders on the health impacts of their decisions and plans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6108262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61082622018-08-29 Primary development and validation of a quantitative health policy impact assessment tool (HEPIAT): The case of Iranian targeted subsidy plan Nadrian, Haidar Babazadeh, Towhid Nadrian, Nadia Mahmoodi, Hassan Khosravi, Anvar Med J Islam Repub Iran Original Article Background: As a primary phase of a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) on the Iranian Targeted Subsidy Plan (TSP), this study was conducted to assess the psychometric properties of a newly developed quantitative Health Policy Impact Assessment Tool (HEPIAT). Methods: In 2014, multistage cluster sampling was employed to recruit 509 key informants in Sanandaj, Iran, to participate in this cross-sectional study. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to develop the initial draft of HEPIAT. Content validity was determined by a consensus panel of experts, and construct validity and factor structure of the HEPIAT were assessed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). Reliability was assessed utilizing the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and the test– retest reliability coefficient. Results: Applying EFA, the optimal solution including 35 items and 6 factors was emerged, which accounted for 64.94% of the total variance. The mean items’ relevancy, clarity, simplicity, and their total mean±SD score were 88.3±0.2, 90.1±0.5, 86.1±0.7, and 89.6±0.4, respectively. The scores of intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and internal consistency reliability for all the factors were ranged from 0.67 to 0.89. HEPIAT demonstrated an appropriate validity, reliability, functionality, and simplicity. Conclusion: Although further works in different settings are warranted, HEPIAT may be a practical and useful quantitative instrument in socioeconomic-related HIAs aimed to inform policymakers and stakeholders on the health impacts of their decisions and plans. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2018-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6108262/ /pubmed/30159273 http://dx.doi.org/10.14196/mjiri.32.22 Text en © 2018 Iran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nadrian, Haidar
Babazadeh, Towhid
Nadrian, Nadia
Mahmoodi, Hassan
Khosravi, Anvar
Primary development and validation of a quantitative health policy impact assessment tool (HEPIAT): The case of Iranian targeted subsidy plan
title Primary development and validation of a quantitative health policy impact assessment tool (HEPIAT): The case of Iranian targeted subsidy plan
title_full Primary development and validation of a quantitative health policy impact assessment tool (HEPIAT): The case of Iranian targeted subsidy plan
title_fullStr Primary development and validation of a quantitative health policy impact assessment tool (HEPIAT): The case of Iranian targeted subsidy plan
title_full_unstemmed Primary development and validation of a quantitative health policy impact assessment tool (HEPIAT): The case of Iranian targeted subsidy plan
title_short Primary development and validation of a quantitative health policy impact assessment tool (HEPIAT): The case of Iranian targeted subsidy plan
title_sort primary development and validation of a quantitative health policy impact assessment tool (hepiat): the case of iranian targeted subsidy plan
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6108262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30159273
http://dx.doi.org/10.14196/mjiri.32.22
work_keys_str_mv AT nadrianhaidar primarydevelopmentandvalidationofaquantitativehealthpolicyimpactassessmenttoolhepiatthecaseofiraniantargetedsubsidyplan
AT babazadehtowhid primarydevelopmentandvalidationofaquantitativehealthpolicyimpactassessmenttoolhepiatthecaseofiraniantargetedsubsidyplan
AT nadriannadia primarydevelopmentandvalidationofaquantitativehealthpolicyimpactassessmenttoolhepiatthecaseofiraniantargetedsubsidyplan
AT mahmoodihassan primarydevelopmentandvalidationofaquantitativehealthpolicyimpactassessmenttoolhepiatthecaseofiraniantargetedsubsidyplan
AT khosravianvar primarydevelopmentandvalidationofaquantitativehealthpolicyimpactassessmenttoolhepiatthecaseofiraniantargetedsubsidyplan