Cargando…

Low urine pH affects the development of metabolic syndrome, associative with the increase of dyslipidemia and dysglycemia: Nationwide cross-sectional study (KNHANES 2013-2015) and a single-center retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Low urine pH (UpH) and high serum uric acid are considered evidence of metabolic disorders. The effect of low UpH on the development of metabolic syndrome (MetS) is less clear than that of high serum uric acid. We investigated the association between low UpH on the development of MetS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Seung Min, Moon, Jun Sung, Yoon, Ji Sung, Won, Kyu Chang, Lee, Hyoung Woo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6108487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30142166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202757
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Low urine pH (UpH) and high serum uric acid are considered evidence of metabolic disorders. The effect of low UpH on the development of metabolic syndrome (MetS) is less clear than that of high serum uric acid. We investigated the association between low UpH on the development of MetS and its components: central obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and dysglycemia. METHODS: Two studies were conducted based on 2 datasets. The cross-sectional study included 14,511 subjects aged 19–80 years, based on the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2013–2015. The retrospective cohort study included 3,453 subjects aged 19–80 years without MetS at the first checkup, who underwent at least 3 health checkups at a single tertiary hospital between 2011 and 2017. UpH was measured using an automatic urine analyzer in the range of 5.0–9.0 at first visit. RESULTS: In the cross-sectional study, low UpH (= 5.0) was associated with the prevalence of MetS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.480, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.334–1.643, p<0.001), particularly central obesity, dyslipidemia, and dysglycemia (OR ranges 1.282–1.422, p<0.001, all). In the retrospective cohort study, compared with the highest UpH subgroup, the lowest UpH subgroup (= 5.0) was associated with higher risk of MetS development (hazard ratio = 1.394, 95% CI 1.096–1.772, p = 0.007). The incident risk of MetS increased from the highest to lowest UpH subgroups (p for trend = 0.020), among which dyslipidemia and dysglycemia increased (p for trend <0.01, all). CONCLUSION: Low UpH can be used as a surrogate marker of MetS and affects the development of MetS, associative with the increase of dyslipidemia and dysglycemia in those without MetS. If UpH is ≤5.0, efforts to prevent metabolic disorders are warranted.