Cargando…

A review of existing and potential computer user interfaces for modern radiology

ABSTRACT: The digitalization of modern imaging has led radiologists to become very familiar with computers and their user interfaces (UI). New options for display and command offer expanded possibilities, but the mouse and keyboard remain the most commonly utilized, for usability reasons. In this wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iannessi, Antoine, Marcy, Pierre-Yves, Clatz, Olivier, Bertrand, Anne-Sophie, Sugimoto, Maki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6108970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29770927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0620-7
_version_ 1783350236260859904
author Iannessi, Antoine
Marcy, Pierre-Yves
Clatz, Olivier
Bertrand, Anne-Sophie
Sugimoto, Maki
author_facet Iannessi, Antoine
Marcy, Pierre-Yves
Clatz, Olivier
Bertrand, Anne-Sophie
Sugimoto, Maki
author_sort Iannessi, Antoine
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: The digitalization of modern imaging has led radiologists to become very familiar with computers and their user interfaces (UI). New options for display and command offer expanded possibilities, but the mouse and keyboard remain the most commonly utilized, for usability reasons. In this work, we review and discuss different UI and their possible application in radiology. We consider two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging displays in the context of interventional radiology, and discuss interest in touchscreens, kinetic sensors, eye detection, and augmented or virtual reality. We show that UI design specifically for radiologists is key for future use and adoption of such new interfaces. Next-generation UI must fulfil professional needs, while considering contextual constraints. TEACHING POINTS: • The mouse and keyboard remain the most utilized user interfaces for radiologists. • Touchscreen, holographic, kinetic sensors and eye tracking offer new possibilities for interaction. • 3D and 2D imaging require specific user interfaces. • Holographic display and augmented reality provide a third dimension to volume imaging. • Good usability is essential for adoption of new user interfaces by radiologists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6108970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61089702018-08-31 A review of existing and potential computer user interfaces for modern radiology Iannessi, Antoine Marcy, Pierre-Yves Clatz, Olivier Bertrand, Anne-Sophie Sugimoto, Maki Insights Imaging Review ABSTRACT: The digitalization of modern imaging has led radiologists to become very familiar with computers and their user interfaces (UI). New options for display and command offer expanded possibilities, but the mouse and keyboard remain the most commonly utilized, for usability reasons. In this work, we review and discuss different UI and their possible application in radiology. We consider two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging displays in the context of interventional radiology, and discuss interest in touchscreens, kinetic sensors, eye detection, and augmented or virtual reality. We show that UI design specifically for radiologists is key for future use and adoption of such new interfaces. Next-generation UI must fulfil professional needs, while considering contextual constraints. TEACHING POINTS: • The mouse and keyboard remain the most utilized user interfaces for radiologists. • Touchscreen, holographic, kinetic sensors and eye tracking offer new possibilities for interaction. • 3D and 2D imaging require specific user interfaces. • Holographic display and augmented reality provide a third dimension to volume imaging. • Good usability is essential for adoption of new user interfaces by radiologists. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6108970/ /pubmed/29770927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0620-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Iannessi, Antoine
Marcy, Pierre-Yves
Clatz, Olivier
Bertrand, Anne-Sophie
Sugimoto, Maki
A review of existing and potential computer user interfaces for modern radiology
title A review of existing and potential computer user interfaces for modern radiology
title_full A review of existing and potential computer user interfaces for modern radiology
title_fullStr A review of existing and potential computer user interfaces for modern radiology
title_full_unstemmed A review of existing and potential computer user interfaces for modern radiology
title_short A review of existing and potential computer user interfaces for modern radiology
title_sort review of existing and potential computer user interfaces for modern radiology
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6108970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29770927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0620-7
work_keys_str_mv AT iannessiantoine areviewofexistingandpotentialcomputeruserinterfacesformodernradiology
AT marcypierreyves areviewofexistingandpotentialcomputeruserinterfacesformodernradiology
AT clatzolivier areviewofexistingandpotentialcomputeruserinterfacesformodernradiology
AT bertrandannesophie areviewofexistingandpotentialcomputeruserinterfacesformodernradiology
AT sugimotomaki areviewofexistingandpotentialcomputeruserinterfacesformodernradiology
AT iannessiantoine reviewofexistingandpotentialcomputeruserinterfacesformodernradiology
AT marcypierreyves reviewofexistingandpotentialcomputeruserinterfacesformodernradiology
AT clatzolivier reviewofexistingandpotentialcomputeruserinterfacesformodernradiology
AT bertrandannesophie reviewofexistingandpotentialcomputeruserinterfacesformodernradiology
AT sugimotomaki reviewofexistingandpotentialcomputeruserinterfacesformodernradiology