Cargando…

Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand?

ABSTRACT: Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging (PMFMRI) is increasingly used thanks to its good overall concordance with histology paralleling the rising incidence of parental refusal of autopsy. The technique could become a routine clinical examination but it needs to be standardized and con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Hondt, Aurélie, Cassart, Marie, De Maubeuge, Raymond, Soto Ares, Gustavo, Rommens, Jacques, Avni, E. Fred
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6108974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29869137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0627-0
_version_ 1783350237202481152
author D’Hondt, Aurélie
Cassart, Marie
De Maubeuge, Raymond
Soto Ares, Gustavo
Rommens, Jacques
Avni, E. Fred
author_facet D’Hondt, Aurélie
Cassart, Marie
De Maubeuge, Raymond
Soto Ares, Gustavo
Rommens, Jacques
Avni, E. Fred
author_sort D’Hondt, Aurélie
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging (PMFMRI) is increasingly used thanks to its good overall concordance with histology paralleling the rising incidence of parental refusal of autopsy. The technique could become a routine clinical examination but it needs to be standardized and conducted by trained radiologists. Such radiologists should be aware of not only the (congenital and acquired) anomalies that can involve the fetus, but also of the “physiological” postmortem changes. In this article, we intend to focus on the contribution of PMFMRI based on the existing literature and on our own experience, as we presently perform the technique routinely in our clinical practice. KEY POINTS: • Concordance rates between PMFMRI and autopsy are high for detecting fetal pathologies. • PMFMRI is more acceptable for parents than traditional autopsy. • PMFMRI is becoming widely used as a part of the postmortem investigations. • A dedicated radiologist needs to learn to interpret correctly a PMFMRI. • PMFMRI can be easily realized in daily clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6108974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61089742018-08-31 Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand? D’Hondt, Aurélie Cassart, Marie De Maubeuge, Raymond Soto Ares, Gustavo Rommens, Jacques Avni, E. Fred Insights Imaging Review ABSTRACT: Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging (PMFMRI) is increasingly used thanks to its good overall concordance with histology paralleling the rising incidence of parental refusal of autopsy. The technique could become a routine clinical examination but it needs to be standardized and conducted by trained radiologists. Such radiologists should be aware of not only the (congenital and acquired) anomalies that can involve the fetus, but also of the “physiological” postmortem changes. In this article, we intend to focus on the contribution of PMFMRI based on the existing literature and on our own experience, as we presently perform the technique routinely in our clinical practice. KEY POINTS: • Concordance rates between PMFMRI and autopsy are high for detecting fetal pathologies. • PMFMRI is more acceptable for parents than traditional autopsy. • PMFMRI is becoming widely used as a part of the postmortem investigations. • A dedicated radiologist needs to learn to interpret correctly a PMFMRI. • PMFMRI can be easily realized in daily clinical practice. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6108974/ /pubmed/29869137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0627-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
D’Hondt, Aurélie
Cassart, Marie
De Maubeuge, Raymond
Soto Ares, Gustavo
Rommens, Jacques
Avni, E. Fred
Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand?
title Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand?
title_full Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand?
title_fullStr Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand?
title_full_unstemmed Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand?
title_short Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand?
title_sort postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6108974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29869137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0627-0
work_keys_str_mv AT dhondtaurelie postmortemfetalmagneticresonanceimagingwheredowestand
AT cassartmarie postmortemfetalmagneticresonanceimagingwheredowestand
AT demaubeugeraymond postmortemfetalmagneticresonanceimagingwheredowestand
AT sotoaresgustavo postmortemfetalmagneticresonanceimagingwheredowestand
AT rommensjacques postmortemfetalmagneticresonanceimagingwheredowestand
AT avniefred postmortemfetalmagneticresonanceimagingwheredowestand