Cargando…
Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand?
ABSTRACT: Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging (PMFMRI) is increasingly used thanks to its good overall concordance with histology paralleling the rising incidence of parental refusal of autopsy. The technique could become a routine clinical examination but it needs to be standardized and con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6108974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29869137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0627-0 |
_version_ | 1783350237202481152 |
---|---|
author | D’Hondt, Aurélie Cassart, Marie De Maubeuge, Raymond Soto Ares, Gustavo Rommens, Jacques Avni, E. Fred |
author_facet | D’Hondt, Aurélie Cassart, Marie De Maubeuge, Raymond Soto Ares, Gustavo Rommens, Jacques Avni, E. Fred |
author_sort | D’Hondt, Aurélie |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging (PMFMRI) is increasingly used thanks to its good overall concordance with histology paralleling the rising incidence of parental refusal of autopsy. The technique could become a routine clinical examination but it needs to be standardized and conducted by trained radiologists. Such radiologists should be aware of not only the (congenital and acquired) anomalies that can involve the fetus, but also of the “physiological” postmortem changes. In this article, we intend to focus on the contribution of PMFMRI based on the existing literature and on our own experience, as we presently perform the technique routinely in our clinical practice. KEY POINTS: • Concordance rates between PMFMRI and autopsy are high for detecting fetal pathologies. • PMFMRI is more acceptable for parents than traditional autopsy. • PMFMRI is becoming widely used as a part of the postmortem investigations. • A dedicated radiologist needs to learn to interpret correctly a PMFMRI. • PMFMRI can be easily realized in daily clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6108974 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61089742018-08-31 Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand? D’Hondt, Aurélie Cassart, Marie De Maubeuge, Raymond Soto Ares, Gustavo Rommens, Jacques Avni, E. Fred Insights Imaging Review ABSTRACT: Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging (PMFMRI) is increasingly used thanks to its good overall concordance with histology paralleling the rising incidence of parental refusal of autopsy. The technique could become a routine clinical examination but it needs to be standardized and conducted by trained radiologists. Such radiologists should be aware of not only the (congenital and acquired) anomalies that can involve the fetus, but also of the “physiological” postmortem changes. In this article, we intend to focus on the contribution of PMFMRI based on the existing literature and on our own experience, as we presently perform the technique routinely in our clinical practice. KEY POINTS: • Concordance rates between PMFMRI and autopsy are high for detecting fetal pathologies. • PMFMRI is more acceptable for parents than traditional autopsy. • PMFMRI is becoming widely used as a part of the postmortem investigations. • A dedicated radiologist needs to learn to interpret correctly a PMFMRI. • PMFMRI can be easily realized in daily clinical practice. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6108974/ /pubmed/29869137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0627-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review D’Hondt, Aurélie Cassart, Marie De Maubeuge, Raymond Soto Ares, Gustavo Rommens, Jacques Avni, E. Fred Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand? |
title | Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand? |
title_full | Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand? |
title_fullStr | Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand? |
title_full_unstemmed | Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand? |
title_short | Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand? |
title_sort | postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6108974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29869137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0627-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dhondtaurelie postmortemfetalmagneticresonanceimagingwheredowestand AT cassartmarie postmortemfetalmagneticresonanceimagingwheredowestand AT demaubeugeraymond postmortemfetalmagneticresonanceimagingwheredowestand AT sotoaresgustavo postmortemfetalmagneticresonanceimagingwheredowestand AT rommensjacques postmortemfetalmagneticresonanceimagingwheredowestand AT avniefred postmortemfetalmagneticresonanceimagingwheredowestand |