Cargando…
The Impact Factor Fallacy
The use of the journal impact factor (JIF) as a measure for the quality of individual manuscripts and the merits of scientists has faced significant criticism in recent years. We add to the current criticism in arguing that such an application of the JIF in policy and decision making in academia is...
Autores principales: | Paulus, Frieder M., Cruz, Nicole, Krach, Sören |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6109637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30177900 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01487 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Journal Impact Factor Shapes Scientists’ Reward Signal in the Prospect of Publication
por: Paulus, Frieder Michel, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The Fallacy of the Theoretical Meaning of Formative Constructs
por: Guyon, Hervé
Publicado: (2018) -
The Fallacy of a “Task-Negative” Network
por: Spreng, R. Nathan
Publicado: (2012) -
The consistency fallacy and failures of theory embellishment
por: Chatham, Christopher H.
Publicado: (2013) -
The Gambler’s Fallacy: A Basic Inhibitory Process?
por: Lyons, James, et al.
Publicado: (2013)