Cargando…

Treatment options for refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma: an updated evidence synthesis by network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma (RRMM) remains a big clinical challenge, due to its biological and clinical complexity. Leading hematologists have performed many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) worldwide, and their findings were summarized in a recently published network met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Xian-Wu, Du, Xue-Qing, Li, Jie-Li, Liu, Xiao-Ping, Meng, Xiang-Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6109665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30174457
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S166640
_version_ 1783350363414331392
author Luo, Xian-Wu
Du, Xue-Qing
Li, Jie-Li
Liu, Xiao-Ping
Meng, Xiang-Yu
author_facet Luo, Xian-Wu
Du, Xue-Qing
Li, Jie-Li
Liu, Xiao-Ping
Meng, Xiang-Yu
author_sort Luo, Xian-Wu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma (RRMM) remains a big clinical challenge, due to its biological and clinical complexity. Leading hematologists have performed many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) worldwide, and their findings were summarized in a recently published network meta-analysis (NMA) but with certain limitations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an updated NMA of RCTs related to RRMM treatment, focusing on efficacy measures including the nonresponse rate (NRR), time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The PubMed database was searched. We extended the literature search strategy of a previous NMA to June 30, 2017 and included additional primary RCTs. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated to rank the regimens. A weighted-average method was used to rank the regimens by summarizing SUCRAs across different outcome measures. RESULTS: Finally, a total of 24 RCTs were included in this updated NMA. According to the result, the combination of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone showed better efficacy than other regimens in terms of NRR, TTP, and PFS (NRR: odds ratio [OR] =0.046, 95% credible interval [CrI] =[0.024, 0.085]; TTP: hazard ratio [HR] =0.14, 95% CrI =[0.092, 0.2]; PFS: HR =0.12, 95% CrI =[0.077, 0.18], compared with dexamethasone singlet). The combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone showed better efficacy than other regimens in terms of OS (HR =0.30, 95% CrI =[0.17, 0.54], compared with dexamethasone). The combination of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone ranked first in terms of overall efficacy (weighted average of SUCRAs =0.920). CONCLUSION: The combination of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone may currently be the most effective regimen in the population of RRMM patients. Triplet regimens containing daratumumab, ixazomib, carfilzomib, or elotumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone can be recommended as first-line therapies for RRMM patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6109665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61096652018-08-31 Treatment options for refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma: an updated evidence synthesis by network meta-analysis Luo, Xian-Wu Du, Xue-Qing Li, Jie-Li Liu, Xiao-Ping Meng, Xiang-Yu Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma (RRMM) remains a big clinical challenge, due to its biological and clinical complexity. Leading hematologists have performed many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) worldwide, and their findings were summarized in a recently published network meta-analysis (NMA) but with certain limitations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an updated NMA of RCTs related to RRMM treatment, focusing on efficacy measures including the nonresponse rate (NRR), time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The PubMed database was searched. We extended the literature search strategy of a previous NMA to June 30, 2017 and included additional primary RCTs. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated to rank the regimens. A weighted-average method was used to rank the regimens by summarizing SUCRAs across different outcome measures. RESULTS: Finally, a total of 24 RCTs were included in this updated NMA. According to the result, the combination of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone showed better efficacy than other regimens in terms of NRR, TTP, and PFS (NRR: odds ratio [OR] =0.046, 95% credible interval [CrI] =[0.024, 0.085]; TTP: hazard ratio [HR] =0.14, 95% CrI =[0.092, 0.2]; PFS: HR =0.12, 95% CrI =[0.077, 0.18], compared with dexamethasone singlet). The combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone showed better efficacy than other regimens in terms of OS (HR =0.30, 95% CrI =[0.17, 0.54], compared with dexamethasone). The combination of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone ranked first in terms of overall efficacy (weighted average of SUCRAs =0.920). CONCLUSION: The combination of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone may currently be the most effective regimen in the population of RRMM patients. Triplet regimens containing daratumumab, ixazomib, carfilzomib, or elotumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone can be recommended as first-line therapies for RRMM patients. Dove Medical Press 2018-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6109665/ /pubmed/30174457 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S166640 Text en © 2018 Luo et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Luo, Xian-Wu
Du, Xue-Qing
Li, Jie-Li
Liu, Xiao-Ping
Meng, Xiang-Yu
Treatment options for refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma: an updated evidence synthesis by network meta-analysis
title Treatment options for refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma: an updated evidence synthesis by network meta-analysis
title_full Treatment options for refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma: an updated evidence synthesis by network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Treatment options for refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma: an updated evidence synthesis by network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Treatment options for refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma: an updated evidence synthesis by network meta-analysis
title_short Treatment options for refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma: an updated evidence synthesis by network meta-analysis
title_sort treatment options for refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma: an updated evidence synthesis by network meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6109665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30174457
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S166640
work_keys_str_mv AT luoxianwu treatmentoptionsforrefractoryrelapsedmultiplemyelomaanupdatedevidencesynthesisbynetworkmetaanalysis
AT duxueqing treatmentoptionsforrefractoryrelapsedmultiplemyelomaanupdatedevidencesynthesisbynetworkmetaanalysis
AT lijieli treatmentoptionsforrefractoryrelapsedmultiplemyelomaanupdatedevidencesynthesisbynetworkmetaanalysis
AT liuxiaoping treatmentoptionsforrefractoryrelapsedmultiplemyelomaanupdatedevidencesynthesisbynetworkmetaanalysis
AT mengxiangyu treatmentoptionsforrefractoryrelapsedmultiplemyelomaanupdatedevidencesynthesisbynetworkmetaanalysis