Cargando…

Neoadjuvant Therapy of Cervical Carcinoma with the Angiogenesis Inhibitor Bevacizumab: a Single-Centre Analysis

Introduction Cervical cancer is the fourth most frequent cancer in women worldwide. Addition of the VEGF antibody bevacizumab in combination with platinum-containing chemotherapy achieved an improvement in overall survival in advanced cervical cancer. To date there are no data on neoadjuvant use of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Junker, Philip, Puppe, Julian, Thangarajah, Fabinshy, Domröse, Christian, Cepic, Angela, Morgenstern, Bernd, Ratiu, Dominik, Hellmich, Martin, Mallmann, Peter, Wirtz, Marina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6109715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0641-5588
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction Cervical cancer is the fourth most frequent cancer in women worldwide. Addition of the VEGF antibody bevacizumab in combination with platinum-containing chemotherapy achieved an improvement in overall survival in advanced cervical cancer. To date there are no data on neoadjuvant use of bevacizumab. We therefore studied the benefit of neoadjuvant combined therapy with bevacizumab in a group of cervical cancer patients. Patients and Methods This retrospective cohort study analysed 14 patients with cervical cancer FIGO stages 1b1 to IV who received neoadjuvant platinum-containing chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab. The comparative cohort consisted of 16 patients who were treated with neoadjuvant platinum-containing chemotherapy alone. The response rates were determined by means of preoperative clinical examination, diagnostic imaging (RECIST), changes in tumour markers (SCC) and by histopathology. Results A clinical response was found in 93.8% (n = 15) of patients after bevacizumab-free therapy and in 100% (n = 14) of the patients who were treated with bevacizumab in addition. Combined therapy with bevacizumab led to a higher rate of clinical complete remission (42.9 vs. 12.5%; p = 0.072) and significantly improved the reduction in tumour size (Δ longest diameter: 3.7 vs. 2.5 cm; p = 0.025). Downgrading was observed in 100% of all patients treated with bevacizumab compared with 75% in the control arm. The rate of pathological complete remission (pCR) was not altered significantly (28.6% [n = 4] vs. 37.5% [n = 6]; p = 0.460). Discussion Overall, combined therapy with bevacizumab led to a better clinical response. Operability was therefore improved more often. Because of the small patient cohort, larger prospective studies are necessary to validate the effect of neoadjuvant combined therapy with bevacizumab.