Cargando…
Improving access to Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP): the 2-week wait for cancer comes to psychosis
Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services aim to rapidly initiate specialist packages of care for those people newly experiencing symptoms. The intention of such rapid engagement is to mitigate the negative effects of a prolonged duration of untreated psychosis. Aiming to achieve a ‘parity of e...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6109946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30167471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000190 |
_version_ | 1783350395714666496 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Kirit Ghazi, Fatima White, Rebecca Sarfo-Adu, Benedicta Carter, Peter |
author_facet | Singh, Kirit Ghazi, Fatima White, Rebecca Sarfo-Adu, Benedicta Carter, Peter |
author_sort | Singh, Kirit |
collection | PubMed |
description | Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services aim to rapidly initiate specialist packages of care for those people newly experiencing symptoms. The intention of such rapid engagement is to mitigate the negative effects of a prolonged duration of untreated psychosis. Aiming to achieve a ‘parity of esteem’ between mental and physical health, a new target was introduced by the National Health Service (NHS) England, where 50% of new referrals were expected to receive a concordant package of care within 2 weeks from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. A baseline assessment in late 2014 found that just 21% of all referrals received and accepted met this target within the EIP Team for the North-East London NHS Foundation Trust. This project sought to improve the team’s performance, seeking input from all team members and using an iterative process with the primary aim of meeting the target ahead of its roll-out. It was determined that the relatively high number of inappropriate referrals (34% at baseline) is a key causative agent in delaying staff from processing eligible cases in a timely fashion. These are defined as referrals which do not meet basic eligibility criteria such as no previous treatment for psychosis. Interventions were therefore designed targeting three domains of improving staff awareness of the new target, improving efficiency by changing the case allocation process and improving the referral pathway for external sources. The impact of these changes was re-evaluated over two cycles beyond baseline. By the final cycle, 62% of new referrals were seen within 2 weeks, while inappropriate referrals declined to just 3%. The multi-interventional nature of this project limits its generalisability and further work should be carried out to identify those changes that were most impactful. Nevertheless, focused targeting of the referral pathway may prove to be of benefit to other EIP services struggling with lengthy wait times. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6109946 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61099462018-08-30 Improving access to Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP): the 2-week wait for cancer comes to psychosis Singh, Kirit Ghazi, Fatima White, Rebecca Sarfo-Adu, Benedicta Carter, Peter BMJ Open Qual BMJ Quality Improvement report Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services aim to rapidly initiate specialist packages of care for those people newly experiencing symptoms. The intention of such rapid engagement is to mitigate the negative effects of a prolonged duration of untreated psychosis. Aiming to achieve a ‘parity of esteem’ between mental and physical health, a new target was introduced by the National Health Service (NHS) England, where 50% of new referrals were expected to receive a concordant package of care within 2 weeks from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. A baseline assessment in late 2014 found that just 21% of all referrals received and accepted met this target within the EIP Team for the North-East London NHS Foundation Trust. This project sought to improve the team’s performance, seeking input from all team members and using an iterative process with the primary aim of meeting the target ahead of its roll-out. It was determined that the relatively high number of inappropriate referrals (34% at baseline) is a key causative agent in delaying staff from processing eligible cases in a timely fashion. These are defined as referrals which do not meet basic eligibility criteria such as no previous treatment for psychosis. Interventions were therefore designed targeting three domains of improving staff awareness of the new target, improving efficiency by changing the case allocation process and improving the referral pathway for external sources. The impact of these changes was re-evaluated over two cycles beyond baseline. By the final cycle, 62% of new referrals were seen within 2 weeks, while inappropriate referrals declined to just 3%. The multi-interventional nature of this project limits its generalisability and further work should be carried out to identify those changes that were most impactful. Nevertheless, focused targeting of the referral pathway may prove to be of benefit to other EIP services struggling with lengthy wait times. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6109946/ /pubmed/30167471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000190 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | BMJ Quality Improvement report Singh, Kirit Ghazi, Fatima White, Rebecca Sarfo-Adu, Benedicta Carter, Peter Improving access to Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP): the 2-week wait for cancer comes to psychosis |
title | Improving access to Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP): the 2-week wait for cancer comes to psychosis |
title_full | Improving access to Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP): the 2-week wait for cancer comes to psychosis |
title_fullStr | Improving access to Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP): the 2-week wait for cancer comes to psychosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving access to Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP): the 2-week wait for cancer comes to psychosis |
title_short | Improving access to Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP): the 2-week wait for cancer comes to psychosis |
title_sort | improving access to early intervention in psychosis (eip): the 2-week wait for cancer comes to psychosis |
topic | BMJ Quality Improvement report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6109946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30167471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000190 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhkirit improvingaccesstoearlyinterventioninpsychosiseipthe2weekwaitforcancercomestopsychosis AT ghazifatima improvingaccesstoearlyinterventioninpsychosiseipthe2weekwaitforcancercomestopsychosis AT whiterebecca improvingaccesstoearlyinterventioninpsychosiseipthe2weekwaitforcancercomestopsychosis AT sarfoadubenedicta improvingaccesstoearlyinterventioninpsychosiseipthe2weekwaitforcancercomestopsychosis AT carterpeter improvingaccesstoearlyinterventioninpsychosiseipthe2weekwaitforcancercomestopsychosis |