Cargando…
An Age and Activity Algorithm for Treatment of Type II SLAP Tears
BACKGROUND: Type II SLAP tears predominantly occur in males between their third and fifth decades of life. The mechanism of injury is often repeated overheard activity but can also occur due to direct compression loads and traction injuries. The treatment options have changed over the years and incl...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Open
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6110066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30197708 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001812010271 |
_version_ | 1783350416606494720 |
---|---|
author | Charles, Michael D. Christian, David R. Cole, Brian J. |
author_facet | Charles, Michael D. Christian, David R. Cole, Brian J. |
author_sort | Charles, Michael D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Type II SLAP tears predominantly occur in males between their third and fifth decades of life. The mechanism of injury is often repeated overheard activity but can also occur due to direct compression loads and traction injuries. The treatment options have changed over the years and include non-operative therapy, direct labral-biceps complex repair, and labral debridement with biceps tenodesis or tenotomy. OBJECTIVE: To review the existing literature on the management of Type II SLAP tears and provide clinical recommendations based on patient age and activity level. METHODS: A review of the existing literature through October 2017 investigating the management of Type II SLAP tears was performed. Emphasis was placed on distinguishing the outcomes based on age and activity level to provide an appropriate treatment algorithm. RESULTS: Patients with Type II SLAP tears should first be trialed with non-operative management and many patients will have a successful result with ability to return to their respective sports or activities. Surgical management should be considered if non-operative management does not provide symptomatic relief. Young, athletic, or high-demand patients should be treated with a SLAP repair while biceps tenodesis should be considered for older or worker’s compensation patients. Patients undergoing revision surgery for a failed SLAP repair should be managed with biceps tenodesis. CONCLUSION: Type II SLAP tears remain a difficult pathology to manage clinically, but the treatment indications are narrowing. The age and activity algorithm described in this review provides an effective method of managing this complex clinical condition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6110066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Bentham Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61100662018-09-07 An Age and Activity Algorithm for Treatment of Type II SLAP Tears Charles, Michael D. Christian, David R. Cole, Brian J. Open Orthop J Orthopaedics BACKGROUND: Type II SLAP tears predominantly occur in males between their third and fifth decades of life. The mechanism of injury is often repeated overheard activity but can also occur due to direct compression loads and traction injuries. The treatment options have changed over the years and include non-operative therapy, direct labral-biceps complex repair, and labral debridement with biceps tenodesis or tenotomy. OBJECTIVE: To review the existing literature on the management of Type II SLAP tears and provide clinical recommendations based on patient age and activity level. METHODS: A review of the existing literature through October 2017 investigating the management of Type II SLAP tears was performed. Emphasis was placed on distinguishing the outcomes based on age and activity level to provide an appropriate treatment algorithm. RESULTS: Patients with Type II SLAP tears should first be trialed with non-operative management and many patients will have a successful result with ability to return to their respective sports or activities. Surgical management should be considered if non-operative management does not provide symptomatic relief. Young, athletic, or high-demand patients should be treated with a SLAP repair while biceps tenodesis should be considered for older or worker’s compensation patients. Patients undergoing revision surgery for a failed SLAP repair should be managed with biceps tenodesis. CONCLUSION: Type II SLAP tears remain a difficult pathology to manage clinically, but the treatment indications are narrowing. The age and activity algorithm described in this review provides an effective method of managing this complex clinical condition. Bentham Open 2018-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6110066/ /pubmed/30197708 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001812010271 Text en © 2018 Charles et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Orthopaedics Charles, Michael D. Christian, David R. Cole, Brian J. An Age and Activity Algorithm for Treatment of Type II SLAP Tears |
title | An Age and Activity Algorithm for Treatment of Type II SLAP Tears |
title_full | An Age and Activity Algorithm for Treatment of Type II SLAP Tears |
title_fullStr | An Age and Activity Algorithm for Treatment of Type II SLAP Tears |
title_full_unstemmed | An Age and Activity Algorithm for Treatment of Type II SLAP Tears |
title_short | An Age and Activity Algorithm for Treatment of Type II SLAP Tears |
title_sort | age and activity algorithm for treatment of type ii slap tears |
topic | Orthopaedics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6110066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30197708 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001812010271 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT charlesmichaeld anageandactivityalgorithmfortreatmentoftypeiislaptears AT christiandavidr anageandactivityalgorithmfortreatmentoftypeiislaptears AT colebrianj anageandactivityalgorithmfortreatmentoftypeiislaptears AT charlesmichaeld ageandactivityalgorithmfortreatmentoftypeiislaptears AT christiandavidr ageandactivityalgorithmfortreatmentoftypeiislaptears AT colebrianj ageandactivityalgorithmfortreatmentoftypeiislaptears |