Cargando…

Reproductive Costs for Hybridizing Female Anasa tristis (Hemiptera: Coreidae), but No Evidence of Selection Against Interspecific Mating

Individuals of different species sometimes mate in nature, and such behavior often carries costs, such as wasted gametes and inviable offspring. One context in which interspecific mating commonly occurs is when closely related species come into secondary contact. Here, we tested whether reproductive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamel, Jennifer A, Eskeland, Emma E, Lehmann, Tyler K, Stover, Paige L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6110343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30165456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iey080
_version_ 1783350461082894336
author Hamel, Jennifer A
Eskeland, Emma E
Lehmann, Tyler K
Stover, Paige L
author_facet Hamel, Jennifer A
Eskeland, Emma E
Lehmann, Tyler K
Stover, Paige L
author_sort Hamel, Jennifer A
collection PubMed
description Individuals of different species sometimes mate in nature, and such behavior often carries costs, such as wasted gametes and inviable offspring. One context in which interspecific mating commonly occurs is when closely related species come into secondary contact. Here, we tested whether reproductive isolation is greater in an area of recent secondary contact than in allopatry for two closely related insect species, and we examined whether mating between individuals of these two species constitutes reproductive interference. In Florida, two species of squash bugs (Hemiptera: Coreidae: Anasa tristis DeGeer and Anasa andresii Guérin-Méneville) have been secondarily sympatric for ≥80 generations, and male A. andresii copulate with female A. tristis. Because hybridization is often costly for females, we predicted that secondarily sympatric females would be less likely to mate with heterospecifics than would allopatric females. We found no evidence of recent selection on reproductive isolation: females from both populations were equally likely to mate with heterospecifics, and heterospecific males did not make more mating attempts than conspecifics to achieve copulations. However, female A. tristis paired with heterospecifics produced many fewer eggs and offspring than females paired with conspecifics, and this did not differ according to whether females were from allopatric or sympatric populations. Our findings show that reproductive barriers between these species existed before secondary contact. We suggest that habitat use may limit encounter frequency, and that female choice, multiple mating, and postcopulatory processes may reduce costs for females. Consequently, we suggest that mating systems and ecological factors mediate the effects of reproductive interference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6110343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61103432018-08-30 Reproductive Costs for Hybridizing Female Anasa tristis (Hemiptera: Coreidae), but No Evidence of Selection Against Interspecific Mating Hamel, Jennifer A Eskeland, Emma E Lehmann, Tyler K Stover, Paige L J Insect Sci Research Articles Individuals of different species sometimes mate in nature, and such behavior often carries costs, such as wasted gametes and inviable offspring. One context in which interspecific mating commonly occurs is when closely related species come into secondary contact. Here, we tested whether reproductive isolation is greater in an area of recent secondary contact than in allopatry for two closely related insect species, and we examined whether mating between individuals of these two species constitutes reproductive interference. In Florida, two species of squash bugs (Hemiptera: Coreidae: Anasa tristis DeGeer and Anasa andresii Guérin-Méneville) have been secondarily sympatric for ≥80 generations, and male A. andresii copulate with female A. tristis. Because hybridization is often costly for females, we predicted that secondarily sympatric females would be less likely to mate with heterospecifics than would allopatric females. We found no evidence of recent selection on reproductive isolation: females from both populations were equally likely to mate with heterospecifics, and heterospecific males did not make more mating attempts than conspecifics to achieve copulations. However, female A. tristis paired with heterospecifics produced many fewer eggs and offspring than females paired with conspecifics, and this did not differ according to whether females were from allopatric or sympatric populations. Our findings show that reproductive barriers between these species existed before secondary contact. We suggest that habitat use may limit encounter frequency, and that female choice, multiple mating, and postcopulatory processes may reduce costs for females. Consequently, we suggest that mating systems and ecological factors mediate the effects of reproductive interference. Oxford University Press 2018-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6110343/ /pubmed/30165456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iey080 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research Articles
Hamel, Jennifer A
Eskeland, Emma E
Lehmann, Tyler K
Stover, Paige L
Reproductive Costs for Hybridizing Female Anasa tristis (Hemiptera: Coreidae), but No Evidence of Selection Against Interspecific Mating
title Reproductive Costs for Hybridizing Female Anasa tristis (Hemiptera: Coreidae), but No Evidence of Selection Against Interspecific Mating
title_full Reproductive Costs for Hybridizing Female Anasa tristis (Hemiptera: Coreidae), but No Evidence of Selection Against Interspecific Mating
title_fullStr Reproductive Costs for Hybridizing Female Anasa tristis (Hemiptera: Coreidae), but No Evidence of Selection Against Interspecific Mating
title_full_unstemmed Reproductive Costs for Hybridizing Female Anasa tristis (Hemiptera: Coreidae), but No Evidence of Selection Against Interspecific Mating
title_short Reproductive Costs for Hybridizing Female Anasa tristis (Hemiptera: Coreidae), but No Evidence of Selection Against Interspecific Mating
title_sort reproductive costs for hybridizing female anasa tristis (hemiptera: coreidae), but no evidence of selection against interspecific mating
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6110343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30165456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iey080
work_keys_str_mv AT hameljennifera reproductivecostsforhybridizingfemaleanasatristishemipteracoreidaebutnoevidenceofselectionagainstinterspecificmating
AT eskelandemmae reproductivecostsforhybridizingfemaleanasatristishemipteracoreidaebutnoevidenceofselectionagainstinterspecificmating
AT lehmanntylerk reproductivecostsforhybridizingfemaleanasatristishemipteracoreidaebutnoevidenceofselectionagainstinterspecificmating
AT stoverpaigel reproductivecostsforhybridizingfemaleanasatristishemipteracoreidaebutnoevidenceofselectionagainstinterspecificmating