Cargando…
Probiotics for management of infantile colic: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
INTRODUCTION: Infantile colic is a common pediatric problem. The cause of infantile colic remains unclear. Treatment options are limited. Evidence suggests that probiotics might offer some benefit. The aim of the study was to systematically assess the effectiveness of probiotics supplementation in t...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6111368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30154898 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2017.66055 |
_version_ | 1783350644858421248 |
---|---|
author | Dryl, Radoslaw Szajewska, Hanna |
author_facet | Dryl, Radoslaw Szajewska, Hanna |
author_sort | Dryl, Radoslaw |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Infantile colic is a common pediatric problem. The cause of infantile colic remains unclear. Treatment options are limited. Evidence suggests that probiotics might offer some benefit. The aim of the study was to systematically assess the effectiveness of probiotics supplementation in the management of infantile colic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched up to April 2016 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of probiotics (any well-defined strain) compared with placebo for the management of infantile colic. The outcome measures of interest were treatment success and the duration of crying at the end of the intervention. RESULTS: Seven RCTs (471 participants) were included. Compared with placebo the administration of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 at a daily dose of 10(8) CFU was associated with the treatment success (relative risk = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.10–2.81, number needed to treat 5, 95% CI: 4–8) and reduced crying times at the end of the intervention (mean difference: –49 min, 95% CI: –66 to –33); however, the effect was mainly seen in exclusively breastfed infants. Other probiotics (single or in combinations) were studied in single trials only. CONCLUSIONS: Some probiotics, primarily L. reuteri DSM 17938, may be considered for the management of infantile colic. Data on other probiotics are limited. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6111368 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61113682018-08-28 Probiotics for management of infantile colic: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Dryl, Radoslaw Szajewska, Hanna Arch Med Sci Systematic review/Meta-analysis INTRODUCTION: Infantile colic is a common pediatric problem. The cause of infantile colic remains unclear. Treatment options are limited. Evidence suggests that probiotics might offer some benefit. The aim of the study was to systematically assess the effectiveness of probiotics supplementation in the management of infantile colic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched up to April 2016 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of probiotics (any well-defined strain) compared with placebo for the management of infantile colic. The outcome measures of interest were treatment success and the duration of crying at the end of the intervention. RESULTS: Seven RCTs (471 participants) were included. Compared with placebo the administration of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 at a daily dose of 10(8) CFU was associated with the treatment success (relative risk = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.10–2.81, number needed to treat 5, 95% CI: 4–8) and reduced crying times at the end of the intervention (mean difference: –49 min, 95% CI: –66 to –33); however, the effect was mainly seen in exclusively breastfed infants. Other probiotics (single or in combinations) were studied in single trials only. CONCLUSIONS: Some probiotics, primarily L. reuteri DSM 17938, may be considered for the management of infantile colic. Data on other probiotics are limited. Termedia Publishing House 2017-02-16 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6111368/ /pubmed/30154898 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2017.66055 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Systematic review/Meta-analysis Dryl, Radoslaw Szajewska, Hanna Probiotics for management of infantile colic: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
title | Probiotics for management of infantile colic: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Probiotics for management of infantile colic: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Probiotics for management of infantile colic: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Probiotics for management of infantile colic: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Probiotics for management of infantile colic: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | probiotics for management of infantile colic: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Systematic review/Meta-analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6111368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30154898 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2017.66055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT drylradoslaw probioticsformanagementofinfantilecolicasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT szajewskahanna probioticsformanagementofinfantilecolicasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |