Cargando…

Association Between BRCA Status and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of aggressive breast cancer and characterized by a lack of the expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. BRCA genes are tumor-suppressor genes that are involved in DNA damage repair and mutat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Haixia, Wu, Jianming, Zhang, Zhihong, Tang, Yong, Li, Xiaoxuan, Liu, Shuangqing, Cao, Shousong, Li, Xianzhu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6111442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30186165
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00909
_version_ 1783350657070137344
author Chen, Haixia
Wu, Jianming
Zhang, Zhihong
Tang, Yong
Li, Xiaoxuan
Liu, Shuangqing
Cao, Shousong
Li, Xianzhu
author_facet Chen, Haixia
Wu, Jianming
Zhang, Zhihong
Tang, Yong
Li, Xiaoxuan
Liu, Shuangqing
Cao, Shousong
Li, Xianzhu
author_sort Chen, Haixia
collection PubMed
description Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of aggressive breast cancer and characterized by a lack of the expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. BRCA genes are tumor-suppressor genes that are involved in DNA damage repair and mutations of BRCA genes may increase the risk of developing breast cancer and/or ovarian cancer due to defective DNA repair mechanisms. However, the relationship between BRCA status and TNBC needs to be further investigated and validated. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between BRCA status and TNBC. We systematically searched the electronic databases of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify relevant publications from April, 1959 to November, 2017. The data from the studies were examined by a meta-analysis using STATA software to calculate the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) by fixed-effect and random-effect models. We identified 16 qualified studies from 527 publications with 46,870 breast cancer patients including 868 BRCA1 mutations (BRCA1(Mut)) carriers, 739 BRCA2 mutations (BRCA2(Mut)) carriers, and 45,263 non-carriers. The results showed that breast cancer patients with BRCA1(Mut) carriers were more likely to have TNBC than those of BRCA2(Mut) carriers (OR: 3.292; 95% CI: 2.773–3.909) or non-carriers (OR: 8.889; 95% CI: 6.925–11.410). Furthermore, high expression of nuclear grade and large tumor burden (>2 cm) were significantly more common in breast cancer patients with BRCA1(Mut) carriers than those of BRCA2(Mut) carriers (OR: 2.663; 95% CI: 1.731–4.097; P = 0.211) or non-carriers (OR: 1.577; 95% CI: 1.067–2.331; P = 0.157). The data suggest that breast cancer patients with BRCA1(Mut) are more likely to have TNBC, high nuclear grade, and larger tumor burden.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6111442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61114422018-09-05 Association Between BRCA Status and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Chen, Haixia Wu, Jianming Zhang, Zhihong Tang, Yong Li, Xiaoxuan Liu, Shuangqing Cao, Shousong Li, Xianzhu Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of aggressive breast cancer and characterized by a lack of the expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. BRCA genes are tumor-suppressor genes that are involved in DNA damage repair and mutations of BRCA genes may increase the risk of developing breast cancer and/or ovarian cancer due to defective DNA repair mechanisms. However, the relationship between BRCA status and TNBC needs to be further investigated and validated. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between BRCA status and TNBC. We systematically searched the electronic databases of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify relevant publications from April, 1959 to November, 2017. The data from the studies were examined by a meta-analysis using STATA software to calculate the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) by fixed-effect and random-effect models. We identified 16 qualified studies from 527 publications with 46,870 breast cancer patients including 868 BRCA1 mutations (BRCA1(Mut)) carriers, 739 BRCA2 mutations (BRCA2(Mut)) carriers, and 45,263 non-carriers. The results showed that breast cancer patients with BRCA1(Mut) carriers were more likely to have TNBC than those of BRCA2(Mut) carriers (OR: 3.292; 95% CI: 2.773–3.909) or non-carriers (OR: 8.889; 95% CI: 6.925–11.410). Furthermore, high expression of nuclear grade and large tumor burden (>2 cm) were significantly more common in breast cancer patients with BRCA1(Mut) carriers than those of BRCA2(Mut) carriers (OR: 2.663; 95% CI: 1.731–4.097; P = 0.211) or non-carriers (OR: 1.577; 95% CI: 1.067–2.331; P = 0.157). The data suggest that breast cancer patients with BRCA1(Mut) are more likely to have TNBC, high nuclear grade, and larger tumor burden. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6111442/ /pubmed/30186165 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00909 Text en Copyright © 2018 Chen, Wu, Zhang, Tang, Li, Liu, Cao and Li. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Chen, Haixia
Wu, Jianming
Zhang, Zhihong
Tang, Yong
Li, Xiaoxuan
Liu, Shuangqing
Cao, Shousong
Li, Xianzhu
Association Between BRCA Status and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title Association Between BRCA Status and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Association Between BRCA Status and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Association Between BRCA Status and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Association Between BRCA Status and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Association Between BRCA Status and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort association between brca status and triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6111442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30186165
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00909
work_keys_str_mv AT chenhaixia associationbetweenbrcastatusandtriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis
AT wujianming associationbetweenbrcastatusandtriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis
AT zhangzhihong associationbetweenbrcastatusandtriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis
AT tangyong associationbetweenbrcastatusandtriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis
AT lixiaoxuan associationbetweenbrcastatusandtriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis
AT liushuangqing associationbetweenbrcastatusandtriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis
AT caoshousong associationbetweenbrcastatusandtriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis
AT lixianzhu associationbetweenbrcastatusandtriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis