Cargando…

A comparative survey of Nigerian physiotherapists’ familiarity with, knowledge of and utilisation of standard outcome measures: 10 years after initial survey

BACKGROUND: The need for physiotherapists to use standardised outcome measures (SOMs) is recognised and recommended in clinical practice guidelines in many countries. AIM: To evaluate changes in physiotherapy practice in Nigeria on the utilisation of SOMs and physiotherapists’ familiarity with and k...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Odole, Adesola C., Oyewole, Olufemi O., Akinpelu, Aderonke O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6111572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30167500
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v74i1.435
_version_ 1783350680900075520
author Odole, Adesola C.
Oyewole, Olufemi O.
Akinpelu, Aderonke O.
author_facet Odole, Adesola C.
Oyewole, Olufemi O.
Akinpelu, Aderonke O.
author_sort Odole, Adesola C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The need for physiotherapists to use standardised outcome measures (SOMs) is recognised and recommended in clinical practice guidelines in many countries. AIM: To evaluate changes in physiotherapy practice in Nigeria on the utilisation of SOMs and physiotherapists’ familiarity with and knowledge of SOMs over the past decade. METHODS: A comparative cross-sectional survey of present data with 2006 data was undertaken. The existing validated questionnaire of 2006 was used to assess physiotherapists’ familiarity with, knowledge of and utilisation of 16 SOMs. RESULTS: There was a noticeable change in familiarity with and utilisation of 16 SOMs in the current data and in knowledge. Between 52% and 90% of physiotherapists were not familiar with 14 SOMs in 2006, whereas 51.4% – 85.8% of physiotherapists were not familiar with 8 SOMs in 2016; 77% – 97% and 63.4% – 97.3% of physiotherapists were not utilising SOMs in the 2006 and 2016 data, respectively. The least utilised SOMs in 2006 were Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index, Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment and SF-36 Health Survey; in 2016, it was only the Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment. The Visual Analogue Scale and Gross Motor Function Measure remained the most utilised in both data. Duration of practice, age and sex were significant factors for the utilisation of and familiarity with SOMs. CONCLUSION: There was an improvement in the familiarity with, knowledge of and utilisation of SOMs over the past decade among Nigerian physiotherapists but the level of utilisation is unsatisfactory. Action is required if routine outcome measurement is to be achieved. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Utilisation of SOMs is part of core standards of physiotherapy practice for effective management of patients. Although the utilisation of SOMs improved over the past 10 years, it is very low. Therefore, studies directed at finding factors responsible for low utilisation of SOMs among Nigerian physiotherapists are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6111572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61115722018-08-30 A comparative survey of Nigerian physiotherapists’ familiarity with, knowledge of and utilisation of standard outcome measures: 10 years after initial survey Odole, Adesola C. Oyewole, Olufemi O. Akinpelu, Aderonke O. S Afr J Physiother Original Research BACKGROUND: The need for physiotherapists to use standardised outcome measures (SOMs) is recognised and recommended in clinical practice guidelines in many countries. AIM: To evaluate changes in physiotherapy practice in Nigeria on the utilisation of SOMs and physiotherapists’ familiarity with and knowledge of SOMs over the past decade. METHODS: A comparative cross-sectional survey of present data with 2006 data was undertaken. The existing validated questionnaire of 2006 was used to assess physiotherapists’ familiarity with, knowledge of and utilisation of 16 SOMs. RESULTS: There was a noticeable change in familiarity with and utilisation of 16 SOMs in the current data and in knowledge. Between 52% and 90% of physiotherapists were not familiar with 14 SOMs in 2006, whereas 51.4% – 85.8% of physiotherapists were not familiar with 8 SOMs in 2016; 77% – 97% and 63.4% – 97.3% of physiotherapists were not utilising SOMs in the 2006 and 2016 data, respectively. The least utilised SOMs in 2006 were Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index, Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment and SF-36 Health Survey; in 2016, it was only the Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment. The Visual Analogue Scale and Gross Motor Function Measure remained the most utilised in both data. Duration of practice, age and sex were significant factors for the utilisation of and familiarity with SOMs. CONCLUSION: There was an improvement in the familiarity with, knowledge of and utilisation of SOMs over the past decade among Nigerian physiotherapists but the level of utilisation is unsatisfactory. Action is required if routine outcome measurement is to be achieved. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Utilisation of SOMs is part of core standards of physiotherapy practice for effective management of patients. Although the utilisation of SOMs improved over the past 10 years, it is very low. Therefore, studies directed at finding factors responsible for low utilisation of SOMs among Nigerian physiotherapists are warranted. AOSIS 2018-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6111572/ /pubmed/30167500 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v74i1.435 Text en © 2018. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Odole, Adesola C.
Oyewole, Olufemi O.
Akinpelu, Aderonke O.
A comparative survey of Nigerian physiotherapists’ familiarity with, knowledge of and utilisation of standard outcome measures: 10 years after initial survey
title A comparative survey of Nigerian physiotherapists’ familiarity with, knowledge of and utilisation of standard outcome measures: 10 years after initial survey
title_full A comparative survey of Nigerian physiotherapists’ familiarity with, knowledge of and utilisation of standard outcome measures: 10 years after initial survey
title_fullStr A comparative survey of Nigerian physiotherapists’ familiarity with, knowledge of and utilisation of standard outcome measures: 10 years after initial survey
title_full_unstemmed A comparative survey of Nigerian physiotherapists’ familiarity with, knowledge of and utilisation of standard outcome measures: 10 years after initial survey
title_short A comparative survey of Nigerian physiotherapists’ familiarity with, knowledge of and utilisation of standard outcome measures: 10 years after initial survey
title_sort comparative survey of nigerian physiotherapists’ familiarity with, knowledge of and utilisation of standard outcome measures: 10 years after initial survey
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6111572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30167500
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v74i1.435
work_keys_str_mv AT odoleadesolac acomparativesurveyofnigerianphysiotherapistsfamiliaritywithknowledgeofandutilisationofstandardoutcomemeasures10yearsafterinitialsurvey
AT oyewoleolufemio acomparativesurveyofnigerianphysiotherapistsfamiliaritywithknowledgeofandutilisationofstandardoutcomemeasures10yearsafterinitialsurvey
AT akinpeluaderonkeo acomparativesurveyofnigerianphysiotherapistsfamiliaritywithknowledgeofandutilisationofstandardoutcomemeasures10yearsafterinitialsurvey
AT odoleadesolac comparativesurveyofnigerianphysiotherapistsfamiliaritywithknowledgeofandutilisationofstandardoutcomemeasures10yearsafterinitialsurvey
AT oyewoleolufemio comparativesurveyofnigerianphysiotherapistsfamiliaritywithknowledgeofandutilisationofstandardoutcomemeasures10yearsafterinitialsurvey
AT akinpeluaderonkeo comparativesurveyofnigerianphysiotherapistsfamiliaritywithknowledgeofandutilisationofstandardoutcomemeasures10yearsafterinitialsurvey