Cargando…

Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination for TG02 Spacelab Using Onboard GNSS Data

Tiangong-2, the second Chinese manned spacecraft, was launched into low Earth orbit on 15 September 2016. The dual-frequency geodetic GNSS receiver equipped on it is supporting a number of scientific experiments in orbit. This paper uses the onboard GNSS data from 3–31 December 2016 (in the attitude...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Kai, Zhou, Xuhua, Wang, Wenbin, Gao, Yang, Zhao, Gang, Tao, Enzhe, Xu, Kexin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6111924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30110935
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18082671
_version_ 1783350758065831936
author Li, Kai
Zhou, Xuhua
Wang, Wenbin
Gao, Yang
Zhao, Gang
Tao, Enzhe
Xu, Kexin
author_facet Li, Kai
Zhou, Xuhua
Wang, Wenbin
Gao, Yang
Zhao, Gang
Tao, Enzhe
Xu, Kexin
author_sort Li, Kai
collection PubMed
description Tiangong-2, the second Chinese manned spacecraft, was launched into low Earth orbit on 15 September 2016. The dual-frequency geodetic GNSS receiver equipped on it is supporting a number of scientific experiments in orbit. This paper uses the onboard GNSS data from 3–31 December 2016 (in the attitude mode of three-axis Earth-pointing stabilization) to analyze the data quantity, as well as the code multipath error. Then, the dynamic and reduced-dynamic methods are adopted to perform the post Precise Orbit Determination (POD) based on the carrier phase measurements, respectively. After that, the orbit accuracy is evaluated using a number of tests, which include the analysis of observation residuals, Overlapping Orbit Differences (OODs), orbit comparison between dynamic and reduced-dynamic and Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) validation. The results show that: (1) the average Root Mean Square (RMS) of the on-board GNSS phase fitting residuals is 8.8 mm; (2) regarding the OODs determined by the reduced-dynamic method, the average RMS in radial (R), along-track (T) and cross-track (N) directions is 0.43 cm, 1.34 cm and 0.39 cm, respectively, and there are no obvious system errors; (3) the orbit accuracy of TG02 determined by the reduced-dynamic method is comparable to that of the dynamic method, and the average RMS of their differences in R, T, N and 3D directions is 3.05 cm, 3.60 cm, 2.52 cm and 5.40 cm, respectively; (4) SLR data are used to validate the reduced-dynamic orbits, and the average RMS along the station-satellite direction is 1.94 cm. It can be seen that both of these two methods can meet the demands of 3D centimeter-level orbit determination for TG02.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6111924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61119242018-08-30 Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination for TG02 Spacelab Using Onboard GNSS Data Li, Kai Zhou, Xuhua Wang, Wenbin Gao, Yang Zhao, Gang Tao, Enzhe Xu, Kexin Sensors (Basel) Article Tiangong-2, the second Chinese manned spacecraft, was launched into low Earth orbit on 15 September 2016. The dual-frequency geodetic GNSS receiver equipped on it is supporting a number of scientific experiments in orbit. This paper uses the onboard GNSS data from 3–31 December 2016 (in the attitude mode of three-axis Earth-pointing stabilization) to analyze the data quantity, as well as the code multipath error. Then, the dynamic and reduced-dynamic methods are adopted to perform the post Precise Orbit Determination (POD) based on the carrier phase measurements, respectively. After that, the orbit accuracy is evaluated using a number of tests, which include the analysis of observation residuals, Overlapping Orbit Differences (OODs), orbit comparison between dynamic and reduced-dynamic and Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) validation. The results show that: (1) the average Root Mean Square (RMS) of the on-board GNSS phase fitting residuals is 8.8 mm; (2) regarding the OODs determined by the reduced-dynamic method, the average RMS in radial (R), along-track (T) and cross-track (N) directions is 0.43 cm, 1.34 cm and 0.39 cm, respectively, and there are no obvious system errors; (3) the orbit accuracy of TG02 determined by the reduced-dynamic method is comparable to that of the dynamic method, and the average RMS of their differences in R, T, N and 3D directions is 3.05 cm, 3.60 cm, 2.52 cm and 5.40 cm, respectively; (4) SLR data are used to validate the reduced-dynamic orbits, and the average RMS along the station-satellite direction is 1.94 cm. It can be seen that both of these two methods can meet the demands of 3D centimeter-level orbit determination for TG02. MDPI 2018-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6111924/ /pubmed/30110935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18082671 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Kai
Zhou, Xuhua
Wang, Wenbin
Gao, Yang
Zhao, Gang
Tao, Enzhe
Xu, Kexin
Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination for TG02 Spacelab Using Onboard GNSS Data
title Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination for TG02 Spacelab Using Onboard GNSS Data
title_full Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination for TG02 Spacelab Using Onboard GNSS Data
title_fullStr Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination for TG02 Spacelab Using Onboard GNSS Data
title_full_unstemmed Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination for TG02 Spacelab Using Onboard GNSS Data
title_short Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination for TG02 Spacelab Using Onboard GNSS Data
title_sort centimeter-level orbit determination for tg02 spacelab using onboard gnss data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6111924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30110935
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18082671
work_keys_str_mv AT likai centimeterlevelorbitdeterminationfortg02spacelabusingonboardgnssdata
AT zhouxuhua centimeterlevelorbitdeterminationfortg02spacelabusingonboardgnssdata
AT wangwenbin centimeterlevelorbitdeterminationfortg02spacelabusingonboardgnssdata
AT gaoyang centimeterlevelorbitdeterminationfortg02spacelabusingonboardgnssdata
AT zhaogang centimeterlevelorbitdeterminationfortg02spacelabusingonboardgnssdata
AT taoenzhe centimeterlevelorbitdeterminationfortg02spacelabusingonboardgnssdata
AT xukexin centimeterlevelorbitdeterminationfortg02spacelabusingonboardgnssdata