Cargando…
Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination for TG02 Spacelab Using Onboard GNSS Data
Tiangong-2, the second Chinese manned spacecraft, was launched into low Earth orbit on 15 September 2016. The dual-frequency geodetic GNSS receiver equipped on it is supporting a number of scientific experiments in orbit. This paper uses the onboard GNSS data from 3–31 December 2016 (in the attitude...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6111924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30110935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18082671 |
_version_ | 1783350758065831936 |
---|---|
author | Li, Kai Zhou, Xuhua Wang, Wenbin Gao, Yang Zhao, Gang Tao, Enzhe Xu, Kexin |
author_facet | Li, Kai Zhou, Xuhua Wang, Wenbin Gao, Yang Zhao, Gang Tao, Enzhe Xu, Kexin |
author_sort | Li, Kai |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tiangong-2, the second Chinese manned spacecraft, was launched into low Earth orbit on 15 September 2016. The dual-frequency geodetic GNSS receiver equipped on it is supporting a number of scientific experiments in orbit. This paper uses the onboard GNSS data from 3–31 December 2016 (in the attitude mode of three-axis Earth-pointing stabilization) to analyze the data quantity, as well as the code multipath error. Then, the dynamic and reduced-dynamic methods are adopted to perform the post Precise Orbit Determination (POD) based on the carrier phase measurements, respectively. After that, the orbit accuracy is evaluated using a number of tests, which include the analysis of observation residuals, Overlapping Orbit Differences (OODs), orbit comparison between dynamic and reduced-dynamic and Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) validation. The results show that: (1) the average Root Mean Square (RMS) of the on-board GNSS phase fitting residuals is 8.8 mm; (2) regarding the OODs determined by the reduced-dynamic method, the average RMS in radial (R), along-track (T) and cross-track (N) directions is 0.43 cm, 1.34 cm and 0.39 cm, respectively, and there are no obvious system errors; (3) the orbit accuracy of TG02 determined by the reduced-dynamic method is comparable to that of the dynamic method, and the average RMS of their differences in R, T, N and 3D directions is 3.05 cm, 3.60 cm, 2.52 cm and 5.40 cm, respectively; (4) SLR data are used to validate the reduced-dynamic orbits, and the average RMS along the station-satellite direction is 1.94 cm. It can be seen that both of these two methods can meet the demands of 3D centimeter-level orbit determination for TG02. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6111924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61119242018-08-30 Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination for TG02 Spacelab Using Onboard GNSS Data Li, Kai Zhou, Xuhua Wang, Wenbin Gao, Yang Zhao, Gang Tao, Enzhe Xu, Kexin Sensors (Basel) Article Tiangong-2, the second Chinese manned spacecraft, was launched into low Earth orbit on 15 September 2016. The dual-frequency geodetic GNSS receiver equipped on it is supporting a number of scientific experiments in orbit. This paper uses the onboard GNSS data from 3–31 December 2016 (in the attitude mode of three-axis Earth-pointing stabilization) to analyze the data quantity, as well as the code multipath error. Then, the dynamic and reduced-dynamic methods are adopted to perform the post Precise Orbit Determination (POD) based on the carrier phase measurements, respectively. After that, the orbit accuracy is evaluated using a number of tests, which include the analysis of observation residuals, Overlapping Orbit Differences (OODs), orbit comparison between dynamic and reduced-dynamic and Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) validation. The results show that: (1) the average Root Mean Square (RMS) of the on-board GNSS phase fitting residuals is 8.8 mm; (2) regarding the OODs determined by the reduced-dynamic method, the average RMS in radial (R), along-track (T) and cross-track (N) directions is 0.43 cm, 1.34 cm and 0.39 cm, respectively, and there are no obvious system errors; (3) the orbit accuracy of TG02 determined by the reduced-dynamic method is comparable to that of the dynamic method, and the average RMS of their differences in R, T, N and 3D directions is 3.05 cm, 3.60 cm, 2.52 cm and 5.40 cm, respectively; (4) SLR data are used to validate the reduced-dynamic orbits, and the average RMS along the station-satellite direction is 1.94 cm. It can be seen that both of these two methods can meet the demands of 3D centimeter-level orbit determination for TG02. MDPI 2018-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6111924/ /pubmed/30110935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18082671 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Kai Zhou, Xuhua Wang, Wenbin Gao, Yang Zhao, Gang Tao, Enzhe Xu, Kexin Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination for TG02 Spacelab Using Onboard GNSS Data |
title | Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination for TG02 Spacelab Using Onboard GNSS Data |
title_full | Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination for TG02 Spacelab Using Onboard GNSS Data |
title_fullStr | Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination for TG02 Spacelab Using Onboard GNSS Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination for TG02 Spacelab Using Onboard GNSS Data |
title_short | Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination for TG02 Spacelab Using Onboard GNSS Data |
title_sort | centimeter-level orbit determination for tg02 spacelab using onboard gnss data |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6111924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30110935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18082671 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT likai centimeterlevelorbitdeterminationfortg02spacelabusingonboardgnssdata AT zhouxuhua centimeterlevelorbitdeterminationfortg02spacelabusingonboardgnssdata AT wangwenbin centimeterlevelorbitdeterminationfortg02spacelabusingonboardgnssdata AT gaoyang centimeterlevelorbitdeterminationfortg02spacelabusingonboardgnssdata AT zhaogang centimeterlevelorbitdeterminationfortg02spacelabusingonboardgnssdata AT taoenzhe centimeterlevelorbitdeterminationfortg02spacelabusingonboardgnssdata AT xukexin centimeterlevelorbitdeterminationfortg02spacelabusingonboardgnssdata |