Cargando…
Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre
National Health Service England published the National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (NatSSIP) in 2015. They mandated that individual trusts produce Local Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (LocSSIPs), a set of safety standards drawn from the NatSSIP that apply to a particular clini...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6112386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30167474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000294 |
_version_ | 1783350842842152960 |
---|---|
author | Mason, Matthew Charles Griggs, Rebecca Katie Withecombe, Rachel Xing, Eunice Yun Sandberg, Charlotte Molyneux, Matthew Keith |
author_facet | Mason, Matthew Charles Griggs, Rebecca Katie Withecombe, Rachel Xing, Eunice Yun Sandberg, Charlotte Molyneux, Matthew Keith |
author_sort | Mason, Matthew Charles |
collection | PubMed |
description | National Health Service England published the National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (NatSSIP) in 2015. They mandated that individual trusts produce Local Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (LocSSIPs), a set of safety standards drawn from the NatSSIP that apply to a particular clinical situation in a given department, for all invasive procedures. The project goal was to design and implement the LocSSIP within the endoscopy department. A draft LocSSIP was produced, and a pilot study conducted to gain initial feedback on its use. Version 1 of the checklist was produced and after approval, rolled out for use within the endoscopy department at ‘time out’ and ‘sign out’. A scoring system was developed that allowed the quality of the performance of LocSSIPs to be assessed and recorded as a ‘compliance score’. After 2 months, an independent observer spent a week assessing use of the checklist, recording completion and a compliance score. Analysis of this data led to a number of changes in performing the checklist, wider multidisciplinary team education and integration of the checklist into existing documentation, before reassessing at 12 months. In 2016, ‘time out’ checks were completed in 100% of cases, but full completion was only observed in 68%. ‘Sign out’ checks were completed in 91% of cases, with full completion in 71%. In 2017, ‘time out’ checks were completed in 100% of cases, with full completion in 85%. ‘Sign out’ checks were completed in 100% of cases, with full completion in 91%. The composite score for compliance in 2016 was 57% increasing to 90% in 2017. In conclusion, stronger departmental leadership, broadening education and integration of the checklist into routine documentation to reduce duplication led to significant improvements in compliance with use of the checklist. Ongoing education and assessment is imperative to ensure that compliance is maintained to ensure patient safety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6112386 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61123862018-08-30 Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre Mason, Matthew Charles Griggs, Rebecca Katie Withecombe, Rachel Xing, Eunice Yun Sandberg, Charlotte Molyneux, Matthew Keith BMJ Open Qual BMJ Quality Improvement report National Health Service England published the National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (NatSSIP) in 2015. They mandated that individual trusts produce Local Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (LocSSIPs), a set of safety standards drawn from the NatSSIP that apply to a particular clinical situation in a given department, for all invasive procedures. The project goal was to design and implement the LocSSIP within the endoscopy department. A draft LocSSIP was produced, and a pilot study conducted to gain initial feedback on its use. Version 1 of the checklist was produced and after approval, rolled out for use within the endoscopy department at ‘time out’ and ‘sign out’. A scoring system was developed that allowed the quality of the performance of LocSSIPs to be assessed and recorded as a ‘compliance score’. After 2 months, an independent observer spent a week assessing use of the checklist, recording completion and a compliance score. Analysis of this data led to a number of changes in performing the checklist, wider multidisciplinary team education and integration of the checklist into existing documentation, before reassessing at 12 months. In 2016, ‘time out’ checks were completed in 100% of cases, but full completion was only observed in 68%. ‘Sign out’ checks were completed in 91% of cases, with full completion in 71%. In 2017, ‘time out’ checks were completed in 100% of cases, with full completion in 85%. ‘Sign out’ checks were completed in 100% of cases, with full completion in 91%. The composite score for compliance in 2016 was 57% increasing to 90% in 2017. In conclusion, stronger departmental leadership, broadening education and integration of the checklist into routine documentation to reduce duplication led to significant improvements in compliance with use of the checklist. Ongoing education and assessment is imperative to ensure that compliance is maintained to ensure patient safety. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6112386/ /pubmed/30167474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000294 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | BMJ Quality Improvement report Mason, Matthew Charles Griggs, Rebecca Katie Withecombe, Rachel Xing, Eunice Yun Sandberg, Charlotte Molyneux, Matthew Keith Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre |
title | Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre |
title_full | Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre |
title_fullStr | Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre |
title_full_unstemmed | Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre |
title_short | Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre |
title_sort | improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre |
topic | BMJ Quality Improvement report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6112386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30167474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000294 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT masonmatthewcharles improvementinstaffcompliancewithasafetystandardchecklistinendoscopyinatertiarycentre AT griggsrebeccakatie improvementinstaffcompliancewithasafetystandardchecklistinendoscopyinatertiarycentre AT withecomberachel improvementinstaffcompliancewithasafetystandardchecklistinendoscopyinatertiarycentre AT xingeuniceyun improvementinstaffcompliancewithasafetystandardchecklistinendoscopyinatertiarycentre AT sandbergcharlotte improvementinstaffcompliancewithasafetystandardchecklistinendoscopyinatertiarycentre AT molyneuxmatthewkeith improvementinstaffcompliancewithasafetystandardchecklistinendoscopyinatertiarycentre |