Cargando…

Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre

National Health Service England published the National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (NatSSIP) in 2015. They mandated that individual trusts produce Local Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (LocSSIPs), a set of safety standards drawn from the NatSSIP that apply to a particular clini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mason, Matthew Charles, Griggs, Rebecca Katie, Withecombe, Rachel, Xing, Eunice Yun, Sandberg, Charlotte, Molyneux, Matthew Keith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6112386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30167474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000294
_version_ 1783350842842152960
author Mason, Matthew Charles
Griggs, Rebecca Katie
Withecombe, Rachel
Xing, Eunice Yun
Sandberg, Charlotte
Molyneux, Matthew Keith
author_facet Mason, Matthew Charles
Griggs, Rebecca Katie
Withecombe, Rachel
Xing, Eunice Yun
Sandberg, Charlotte
Molyneux, Matthew Keith
author_sort Mason, Matthew Charles
collection PubMed
description National Health Service England published the National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (NatSSIP) in 2015. They mandated that individual trusts produce Local Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (LocSSIPs), a set of safety standards drawn from the NatSSIP that apply to a particular clinical situation in a given department, for all invasive procedures. The project goal was to design and implement the LocSSIP within the endoscopy department. A draft LocSSIP was produced, and a pilot study conducted to gain initial feedback on its use. Version 1 of the checklist was produced and after approval, rolled out for use within the endoscopy department at ‘time out’ and ‘sign out’. A scoring system was developed that allowed the quality of the performance of LocSSIPs to be assessed and recorded as a ‘compliance score’. After 2 months, an independent observer spent a week assessing use of the checklist, recording completion and a compliance score. Analysis of this data led to a number of changes in performing the checklist, wider multidisciplinary team education and integration of the checklist into existing documentation, before reassessing at 12 months. In 2016, ‘time out’ checks were completed in 100% of cases, but full completion was only observed in 68%. ‘Sign out’ checks were completed in 91% of cases, with full completion in 71%. In 2017, ‘time out’ checks were completed in 100% of cases, with full completion in 85%. ‘Sign out’ checks were completed in 100% of cases, with full completion in 91%. The composite score for compliance in 2016 was 57% increasing to 90% in 2017. In conclusion, stronger departmental leadership, broadening education and integration of the checklist into routine documentation to reduce duplication led to significant improvements in compliance with use of the checklist. Ongoing education and assessment is imperative to ensure that compliance is maintained to ensure patient safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6112386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61123862018-08-30 Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre Mason, Matthew Charles Griggs, Rebecca Katie Withecombe, Rachel Xing, Eunice Yun Sandberg, Charlotte Molyneux, Matthew Keith BMJ Open Qual BMJ Quality Improvement report National Health Service England published the National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (NatSSIP) in 2015. They mandated that individual trusts produce Local Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (LocSSIPs), a set of safety standards drawn from the NatSSIP that apply to a particular clinical situation in a given department, for all invasive procedures. The project goal was to design and implement the LocSSIP within the endoscopy department. A draft LocSSIP was produced, and a pilot study conducted to gain initial feedback on its use. Version 1 of the checklist was produced and after approval, rolled out for use within the endoscopy department at ‘time out’ and ‘sign out’. A scoring system was developed that allowed the quality of the performance of LocSSIPs to be assessed and recorded as a ‘compliance score’. After 2 months, an independent observer spent a week assessing use of the checklist, recording completion and a compliance score. Analysis of this data led to a number of changes in performing the checklist, wider multidisciplinary team education and integration of the checklist into existing documentation, before reassessing at 12 months. In 2016, ‘time out’ checks were completed in 100% of cases, but full completion was only observed in 68%. ‘Sign out’ checks were completed in 91% of cases, with full completion in 71%. In 2017, ‘time out’ checks were completed in 100% of cases, with full completion in 85%. ‘Sign out’ checks were completed in 100% of cases, with full completion in 91%. The composite score for compliance in 2016 was 57% increasing to 90% in 2017. In conclusion, stronger departmental leadership, broadening education and integration of the checklist into routine documentation to reduce duplication led to significant improvements in compliance with use of the checklist. Ongoing education and assessment is imperative to ensure that compliance is maintained to ensure patient safety. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6112386/ /pubmed/30167474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000294 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle BMJ Quality Improvement report
Mason, Matthew Charles
Griggs, Rebecca Katie
Withecombe, Rachel
Xing, Eunice Yun
Sandberg, Charlotte
Molyneux, Matthew Keith
Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre
title Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre
title_full Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre
title_fullStr Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre
title_full_unstemmed Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre
title_short Improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre
title_sort improvement in staff compliance with a safety standard checklist in endoscopy in a tertiary centre
topic BMJ Quality Improvement report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6112386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30167474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000294
work_keys_str_mv AT masonmatthewcharles improvementinstaffcompliancewithasafetystandardchecklistinendoscopyinatertiarycentre
AT griggsrebeccakatie improvementinstaffcompliancewithasafetystandardchecklistinendoscopyinatertiarycentre
AT withecomberachel improvementinstaffcompliancewithasafetystandardchecklistinendoscopyinatertiarycentre
AT xingeuniceyun improvementinstaffcompliancewithasafetystandardchecklistinendoscopyinatertiarycentre
AT sandbergcharlotte improvementinstaffcompliancewithasafetystandardchecklistinendoscopyinatertiarycentre
AT molyneuxmatthewkeith improvementinstaffcompliancewithasafetystandardchecklistinendoscopyinatertiarycentre