Cargando…
Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on patient safety: a systematic review
OBJECTIVES: Communication breakdown is one of the main causes of adverse events in clinical routine, particularly in handover situations. The communication tool SBAR (situation, background, assessment and recommendation) was developed to increase handover quality and is widely assumed to increase pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6112409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30139905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022202 |
_version_ | 1783350848340885504 |
---|---|
author | Müller, Martin Jürgens, Jonas Redaèlli, Marcus Klingberg, Karsten Hautz, Wolf E Stock, Stephanie |
author_facet | Müller, Martin Jürgens, Jonas Redaèlli, Marcus Klingberg, Karsten Hautz, Wolf E Stock, Stephanie |
author_sort | Müller, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Communication breakdown is one of the main causes of adverse events in clinical routine, particularly in handover situations. The communication tool SBAR (situation, background, assessment and recommendation) was developed to increase handover quality and is widely assumed to increase patient safety. The objective of this review is to summarise the impact of the implementation of SBAR on patient safety. DESIGN: A systematic review of articles published on SBAR was performed in PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO in January 2017. All original research articles on SBAR fulfilling the following eligibility criteria were included: (1) SBAR was implemented into clinical routine, (2) the investigation of SBAR was the primary objective and (3) at least one patient outcome was reported. SETTING: A wide range of settings within primary and secondary care and nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: A variety of heath professionals including nurses and physicians. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Aspects of patient safety (patient outcomes) defined as the occurrence or incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Eight studies with a before–after design and three controlled clinical trials performed in different clinical settings met the inclusion criteria. The objectives of the studies were to improve team communication, patient hand-offs and communication in telephone calls from nurses to physicians. The studies were heterogeneous with regard to study characteristics, especially patient outcomes. In total, 26 different patient outcomes were measured, of which eight were reported to be significantly improved. Eleven were described as improved but no further statistical tests were reported, and six outcomes did not change significantly. Only one study reported a descriptive reduction in patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This review found moderate evidence for improved patient safety through SBAR implementation, especially when used to structure communication over the phone. However, there is a lack of high-quality research on this widely used communication tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION: none |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6112409 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61124092018-08-30 Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on patient safety: a systematic review Müller, Martin Jürgens, Jonas Redaèlli, Marcus Klingberg, Karsten Hautz, Wolf E Stock, Stephanie BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: Communication breakdown is one of the main causes of adverse events in clinical routine, particularly in handover situations. The communication tool SBAR (situation, background, assessment and recommendation) was developed to increase handover quality and is widely assumed to increase patient safety. The objective of this review is to summarise the impact of the implementation of SBAR on patient safety. DESIGN: A systematic review of articles published on SBAR was performed in PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO in January 2017. All original research articles on SBAR fulfilling the following eligibility criteria were included: (1) SBAR was implemented into clinical routine, (2) the investigation of SBAR was the primary objective and (3) at least one patient outcome was reported. SETTING: A wide range of settings within primary and secondary care and nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: A variety of heath professionals including nurses and physicians. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Aspects of patient safety (patient outcomes) defined as the occurrence or incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Eight studies with a before–after design and three controlled clinical trials performed in different clinical settings met the inclusion criteria. The objectives of the studies were to improve team communication, patient hand-offs and communication in telephone calls from nurses to physicians. The studies were heterogeneous with regard to study characteristics, especially patient outcomes. In total, 26 different patient outcomes were measured, of which eight were reported to be significantly improved. Eleven were described as improved but no further statistical tests were reported, and six outcomes did not change significantly. Only one study reported a descriptive reduction in patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This review found moderate evidence for improved patient safety through SBAR implementation, especially when used to structure communication over the phone. However, there is a lack of high-quality research on this widely used communication tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION: none BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6112409/ /pubmed/30139905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022202 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Evidence Based Practice Müller, Martin Jürgens, Jonas Redaèlli, Marcus Klingberg, Karsten Hautz, Wolf E Stock, Stephanie Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on patient safety: a systematic review |
title | Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on patient safety: a systematic review |
title_full | Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on patient safety: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on patient safety: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on patient safety: a systematic review |
title_short | Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on patient safety: a systematic review |
title_sort | impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool sbar on patient safety: a systematic review |
topic | Evidence Based Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6112409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30139905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022202 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullermartin impactofthecommunicationandpatienthandofftoolsbaronpatientsafetyasystematicreview AT jurgensjonas impactofthecommunicationandpatienthandofftoolsbaronpatientsafetyasystematicreview AT redaellimarcus impactofthecommunicationandpatienthandofftoolsbaronpatientsafetyasystematicreview AT klingbergkarsten impactofthecommunicationandpatienthandofftoolsbaronpatientsafetyasystematicreview AT hautzwolfe impactofthecommunicationandpatienthandofftoolsbaronpatientsafetyasystematicreview AT stockstephanie impactofthecommunicationandpatienthandofftoolsbaronpatientsafetyasystematicreview |