Cargando…

Recurrent lumbar disc herniation recurrence after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: A case report

RATIONALE: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a degenerative disease and affects human health. Although percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) can redeem the living quality of patient with LDH rapidly, it appears weak to limit the recurrence rate of LDH. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 52-year-old male s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yuanyi, Ning, Cong, Xu, Feng, Xiang, Yipeng, Yao, Liyu, Liu, Yadong, Zhang, Wenjing, Huang, Xiuying, Fu, Changfeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6112869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30142797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011909
_version_ 1783350919283343360
author Wang, Yuanyi
Ning, Cong
Xu, Feng
Xiang, Yipeng
Yao, Liyu
Liu, Yadong
Zhang, Wenjing
Huang, Xiuying
Fu, Changfeng
author_facet Wang, Yuanyi
Ning, Cong
Xu, Feng
Xiang, Yipeng
Yao, Liyu
Liu, Yadong
Zhang, Wenjing
Huang, Xiuying
Fu, Changfeng
author_sort Wang, Yuanyi
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a degenerative disease and affects human health. Although percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) can redeem the living quality of patient with LDH rapidly, it appears weak to limit the recurrence rate of LDH. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 52-year-old male suffered lower back pain and lower limb paralysis for 20 years. However, conservative treatment could not relieve above-mentioned symptoms after doing heavy labor. DIAGNOSES: Computed tomography (CT) revealed a disc fragment had migrated to the inferior edge of the L5 pedicle. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a type 2 Modic change (MC) at L5 and spinal canal stenosis at L4-L5. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with L4-L5 disc herniation and secondary lumbar stenosis. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent surgery twice for PELD at L4-L5 in 1 month. Symptoms were not improved effectively until the conventional posterior discectomy with fusion was performed. OUTCOMES: No signs of recurrence have been detected in 6 months of follow-up, except for mild lower back pain meeting the temperature change. LESSONS: Rapid decompression and instant therapeutic effect do not mean extending the indications of PELD. It is unreasonable to revise the recurrent LDH or treat the primary LDH with PELD under inadequate preoperative assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6112869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61128692018-09-07 Recurrent lumbar disc herniation recurrence after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: A case report Wang, Yuanyi Ning, Cong Xu, Feng Xiang, Yipeng Yao, Liyu Liu, Yadong Zhang, Wenjing Huang, Xiuying Fu, Changfeng Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article RATIONALE: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a degenerative disease and affects human health. Although percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) can redeem the living quality of patient with LDH rapidly, it appears weak to limit the recurrence rate of LDH. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 52-year-old male suffered lower back pain and lower limb paralysis for 20 years. However, conservative treatment could not relieve above-mentioned symptoms after doing heavy labor. DIAGNOSES: Computed tomography (CT) revealed a disc fragment had migrated to the inferior edge of the L5 pedicle. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a type 2 Modic change (MC) at L5 and spinal canal stenosis at L4-L5. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with L4-L5 disc herniation and secondary lumbar stenosis. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent surgery twice for PELD at L4-L5 in 1 month. Symptoms were not improved effectively until the conventional posterior discectomy with fusion was performed. OUTCOMES: No signs of recurrence have been detected in 6 months of follow-up, except for mild lower back pain meeting the temperature change. LESSONS: Rapid decompression and instant therapeutic effect do not mean extending the indications of PELD. It is unreasonable to revise the recurrent LDH or treat the primary LDH with PELD under inadequate preoperative assessment. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6112869/ /pubmed/30142797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011909 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Yuanyi
Ning, Cong
Xu, Feng
Xiang, Yipeng
Yao, Liyu
Liu, Yadong
Zhang, Wenjing
Huang, Xiuying
Fu, Changfeng
Recurrent lumbar disc herniation recurrence after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: A case report
title Recurrent lumbar disc herniation recurrence after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: A case report
title_full Recurrent lumbar disc herniation recurrence after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: A case report
title_fullStr Recurrent lumbar disc herniation recurrence after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: A case report
title_full_unstemmed Recurrent lumbar disc herniation recurrence after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: A case report
title_short Recurrent lumbar disc herniation recurrence after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: A case report
title_sort recurrent lumbar disc herniation recurrence after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a case report
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6112869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30142797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011909
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyuanyi recurrentlumbardischerniationrecurrenceafterpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyacasereport
AT ningcong recurrentlumbardischerniationrecurrenceafterpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyacasereport
AT xufeng recurrentlumbardischerniationrecurrenceafterpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyacasereport
AT xiangyipeng recurrentlumbardischerniationrecurrenceafterpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyacasereport
AT yaoliyu recurrentlumbardischerniationrecurrenceafterpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyacasereport
AT liuyadong recurrentlumbardischerniationrecurrenceafterpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyacasereport
AT zhangwenjing recurrentlumbardischerniationrecurrenceafterpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyacasereport
AT huangxiuying recurrentlumbardischerniationrecurrenceafterpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyacasereport
AT fuchangfeng recurrentlumbardischerniationrecurrenceafterpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyacasereport