Cargando…

Indicators of accumulated fat are stronger associated with prehypertension compared with indicators of circulating fat: A cross-sectional study

Recently, prehypertension has been considered as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease because it can progress to hypertension. The association between obesity and dyslipidemia with raised blood pressure has been reported in some studies; however, the ability of indicators of such conditions to p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rivera-Mancía, Susana, Colín-Ramírez, Eloisa, Cartas-Rosado, Raúl, Infante, Oscar, Vargas-Barrón, Jesús, Vallejo, Maite
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6113050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30142781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011869
_version_ 1783350960672735232
author Rivera-Mancía, Susana
Colín-Ramírez, Eloisa
Cartas-Rosado, Raúl
Infante, Oscar
Vargas-Barrón, Jesús
Vallejo, Maite
author_facet Rivera-Mancía, Susana
Colín-Ramírez, Eloisa
Cartas-Rosado, Raúl
Infante, Oscar
Vargas-Barrón, Jesús
Vallejo, Maite
author_sort Rivera-Mancía, Susana
collection PubMed
description Recently, prehypertension has been considered as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease because it can progress to hypertension. The association between obesity and dyslipidemia with raised blood pressure has been reported in some studies; however, the ability of indicators of such conditions to predict prehypertension has been scarcely explored. In this cross-sectional study, we compared the ability of indicators of accumulated and circulating fat to discriminate between prehypertensive and normotensive Mexico City residents (n = 1377). The indicators were classified based on the parameters needed for their calculation: including only circulating fat (IOCFi) (e.g., Castelli risk indexes), including only accumulated fat (IOAFi) (e.g., waist circumference [WC]), and mixed (e.g., lipid accumulation product [LAP]). We compared the areas under the receiving operating characteristic curves (AURCs) and estimated the cutoff points for each indicator and their associated risk of prehypertension. The IOAFi had the greatest AURCs, followed by mixed and IOCFi; the AURCs for WC were the highest (AURC = 0.688 and 0.666 for women and men, respectively). The highest odds ratios for prehypertension were those associated with the cutoff points for IOAFi and LAP (e.g., OR = 2.8 for women with WC > 83.5 cm and OR = 2.6 for men with WC > 87.5 cm). Early detecting people at risk of cardiovascular disease is a necessity and given that WC had a better performance than the other indexes and it is relatively easy to measure, it has the potential of being used as a complementary measure in routine clinical examinations and by the general population as an auto-screening measurement to detect prehypertension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6113050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61130502018-09-07 Indicators of accumulated fat are stronger associated with prehypertension compared with indicators of circulating fat: A cross-sectional study Rivera-Mancía, Susana Colín-Ramírez, Eloisa Cartas-Rosado, Raúl Infante, Oscar Vargas-Barrón, Jesús Vallejo, Maite Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Recently, prehypertension has been considered as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease because it can progress to hypertension. The association between obesity and dyslipidemia with raised blood pressure has been reported in some studies; however, the ability of indicators of such conditions to predict prehypertension has been scarcely explored. In this cross-sectional study, we compared the ability of indicators of accumulated and circulating fat to discriminate between prehypertensive and normotensive Mexico City residents (n = 1377). The indicators were classified based on the parameters needed for their calculation: including only circulating fat (IOCFi) (e.g., Castelli risk indexes), including only accumulated fat (IOAFi) (e.g., waist circumference [WC]), and mixed (e.g., lipid accumulation product [LAP]). We compared the areas under the receiving operating characteristic curves (AURCs) and estimated the cutoff points for each indicator and their associated risk of prehypertension. The IOAFi had the greatest AURCs, followed by mixed and IOCFi; the AURCs for WC were the highest (AURC = 0.688 and 0.666 for women and men, respectively). The highest odds ratios for prehypertension were those associated with the cutoff points for IOAFi and LAP (e.g., OR = 2.8 for women with WC > 83.5 cm and OR = 2.6 for men with WC > 87.5 cm). Early detecting people at risk of cardiovascular disease is a necessity and given that WC had a better performance than the other indexes and it is relatively easy to measure, it has the potential of being used as a complementary measure in routine clinical examinations and by the general population as an auto-screening measurement to detect prehypertension. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6113050/ /pubmed/30142781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011869 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Rivera-Mancía, Susana
Colín-Ramírez, Eloisa
Cartas-Rosado, Raúl
Infante, Oscar
Vargas-Barrón, Jesús
Vallejo, Maite
Indicators of accumulated fat are stronger associated with prehypertension compared with indicators of circulating fat: A cross-sectional study
title Indicators of accumulated fat are stronger associated with prehypertension compared with indicators of circulating fat: A cross-sectional study
title_full Indicators of accumulated fat are stronger associated with prehypertension compared with indicators of circulating fat: A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Indicators of accumulated fat are stronger associated with prehypertension compared with indicators of circulating fat: A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Indicators of accumulated fat are stronger associated with prehypertension compared with indicators of circulating fat: A cross-sectional study
title_short Indicators of accumulated fat are stronger associated with prehypertension compared with indicators of circulating fat: A cross-sectional study
title_sort indicators of accumulated fat are stronger associated with prehypertension compared with indicators of circulating fat: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6113050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30142781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011869
work_keys_str_mv AT riveramanciasusana indicatorsofaccumulatedfatarestrongerassociatedwithprehypertensioncomparedwithindicatorsofcirculatingfatacrosssectionalstudy
AT colinramirezeloisa indicatorsofaccumulatedfatarestrongerassociatedwithprehypertensioncomparedwithindicatorsofcirculatingfatacrosssectionalstudy
AT cartasrosadoraul indicatorsofaccumulatedfatarestrongerassociatedwithprehypertensioncomparedwithindicatorsofcirculatingfatacrosssectionalstudy
AT infanteoscar indicatorsofaccumulatedfatarestrongerassociatedwithprehypertensioncomparedwithindicatorsofcirculatingfatacrosssectionalstudy
AT vargasbarronjesus indicatorsofaccumulatedfatarestrongerassociatedwithprehypertensioncomparedwithindicatorsofcirculatingfatacrosssectionalstudy
AT vallejomaite indicatorsofaccumulatedfatarestrongerassociatedwithprehypertensioncomparedwithindicatorsofcirculatingfatacrosssectionalstudy