Cargando…

Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital

BACKGROUND: Removal of an intrauterine device can be easily done when the string is visible during speculum exam. The task becomes challenging when the string is no longer visible. METHODOLOGY: The in-patient and out-patient medical records of all patients admitted for hysteroscopic-guided intrauter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asto, Ma. Rosielyn D., Habana, Maria Antonia E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6113989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30254938
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_11_18
_version_ 1783351114022780928
author Asto, Ma. Rosielyn D.
Habana, Maria Antonia E.
author_facet Asto, Ma. Rosielyn D.
Habana, Maria Antonia E.
author_sort Asto, Ma. Rosielyn D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Removal of an intrauterine device can be easily done when the string is visible during speculum exam. The task becomes challenging when the string is no longer visible. METHODOLOGY: The in-patient and out-patient medical records of all patients admitted for hysteroscopic-guided intrauterine device removal from January 2013 to December 2015 from a tertiary academic government hospital were retrieved and reviewed. Demographic data, intraoperative record, and post-operative course and outcome were obtained. Prior attempts on removal were also noted. Total operative time, type of IUD removed, operative findings and any complications encountered were recorded. The size and model of the hysteroscope were also noted. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included, twelve were of reproductive age and seven were already in their menopausal years. Majority were multigravida. Reasons for IUD removal for most patients were spotting, desire for pregnancy, and expired date of use. All patients had prior attempts of ultrasound guided IUD removal. Majority of patients had unremarkable post-operative course and no readmissions were noted. CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic-guided removal of IUD is a superior option for management when ultrasound guided removal fails. Unnecessary major operation and complications were avoided. In the three – year experience, there has been no major complications and re-admissions related to the procedure. Hysteroscopic removal of IUD was shown to be an effective option after failed ultrasound-guided removal with low risk of complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6113989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61139892018-09-24 Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital Asto, Ma. Rosielyn D. Habana, Maria Antonia E. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther Original Article BACKGROUND: Removal of an intrauterine device can be easily done when the string is visible during speculum exam. The task becomes challenging when the string is no longer visible. METHODOLOGY: The in-patient and out-patient medical records of all patients admitted for hysteroscopic-guided intrauterine device removal from January 2013 to December 2015 from a tertiary academic government hospital were retrieved and reviewed. Demographic data, intraoperative record, and post-operative course and outcome were obtained. Prior attempts on removal were also noted. Total operative time, type of IUD removed, operative findings and any complications encountered were recorded. The size and model of the hysteroscope were also noted. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included, twelve were of reproductive age and seven were already in their menopausal years. Majority were multigravida. Reasons for IUD removal for most patients were spotting, desire for pregnancy, and expired date of use. All patients had prior attempts of ultrasound guided IUD removal. Majority of patients had unremarkable post-operative course and no readmissions were noted. CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic-guided removal of IUD is a superior option for management when ultrasound guided removal fails. Unnecessary major operation and complications were avoided. In the three – year experience, there has been no major complications and re-admissions related to the procedure. Hysteroscopic removal of IUD was shown to be an effective option after failed ultrasound-guided removal with low risk of complications. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 2018-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6113989/ /pubmed/30254938 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_11_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Asto, Ma. Rosielyn D.
Habana, Maria Antonia E.
Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital
title Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital
title_full Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital
title_fullStr Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital
title_short Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital
title_sort hysteroscopic-guided removal of retained intrauterine device: experience at an academic tertiary hospital
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6113989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30254938
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_11_18
work_keys_str_mv AT astomarosielynd hysteroscopicguidedremovalofretainedintrauterinedeviceexperienceatanacademictertiaryhospital
AT habanamariaantoniae hysteroscopicguidedremovalofretainedintrauterinedeviceexperienceatanacademictertiaryhospital