Cargando…
Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital
BACKGROUND: Removal of an intrauterine device can be easily done when the string is visible during speculum exam. The task becomes challenging when the string is no longer visible. METHODOLOGY: The in-patient and out-patient medical records of all patients admitted for hysteroscopic-guided intrauter...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6113989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30254938 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_11_18 |
_version_ | 1783351114022780928 |
---|---|
author | Asto, Ma. Rosielyn D. Habana, Maria Antonia E. |
author_facet | Asto, Ma. Rosielyn D. Habana, Maria Antonia E. |
author_sort | Asto, Ma. Rosielyn D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Removal of an intrauterine device can be easily done when the string is visible during speculum exam. The task becomes challenging when the string is no longer visible. METHODOLOGY: The in-patient and out-patient medical records of all patients admitted for hysteroscopic-guided intrauterine device removal from January 2013 to December 2015 from a tertiary academic government hospital were retrieved and reviewed. Demographic data, intraoperative record, and post-operative course and outcome were obtained. Prior attempts on removal were also noted. Total operative time, type of IUD removed, operative findings and any complications encountered were recorded. The size and model of the hysteroscope were also noted. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included, twelve were of reproductive age and seven were already in their menopausal years. Majority were multigravida. Reasons for IUD removal for most patients were spotting, desire for pregnancy, and expired date of use. All patients had prior attempts of ultrasound guided IUD removal. Majority of patients had unremarkable post-operative course and no readmissions were noted. CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic-guided removal of IUD is a superior option for management when ultrasound guided removal fails. Unnecessary major operation and complications were avoided. In the three – year experience, there has been no major complications and re-admissions related to the procedure. Hysteroscopic removal of IUD was shown to be an effective option after failed ultrasound-guided removal with low risk of complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6113989 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61139892018-09-24 Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital Asto, Ma. Rosielyn D. Habana, Maria Antonia E. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther Original Article BACKGROUND: Removal of an intrauterine device can be easily done when the string is visible during speculum exam. The task becomes challenging when the string is no longer visible. METHODOLOGY: The in-patient and out-patient medical records of all patients admitted for hysteroscopic-guided intrauterine device removal from January 2013 to December 2015 from a tertiary academic government hospital were retrieved and reviewed. Demographic data, intraoperative record, and post-operative course and outcome were obtained. Prior attempts on removal were also noted. Total operative time, type of IUD removed, operative findings and any complications encountered were recorded. The size and model of the hysteroscope were also noted. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included, twelve were of reproductive age and seven were already in their menopausal years. Majority were multigravida. Reasons for IUD removal for most patients were spotting, desire for pregnancy, and expired date of use. All patients had prior attempts of ultrasound guided IUD removal. Majority of patients had unremarkable post-operative course and no readmissions were noted. CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic-guided removal of IUD is a superior option for management when ultrasound guided removal fails. Unnecessary major operation and complications were avoided. In the three – year experience, there has been no major complications and re-admissions related to the procedure. Hysteroscopic removal of IUD was shown to be an effective option after failed ultrasound-guided removal with low risk of complications. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 2018-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6113989/ /pubmed/30254938 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_11_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Asto, Ma. Rosielyn D. Habana, Maria Antonia E. Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital |
title | Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital |
title_full | Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital |
title_fullStr | Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital |
title_full_unstemmed | Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital |
title_short | Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital |
title_sort | hysteroscopic-guided removal of retained intrauterine device: experience at an academic tertiary hospital |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6113989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30254938 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_11_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT astomarosielynd hysteroscopicguidedremovalofretainedintrauterinedeviceexperienceatanacademictertiaryhospital AT habanamariaantoniae hysteroscopicguidedremovalofretainedintrauterinedeviceexperienceatanacademictertiaryhospital |