Cargando…

Effect of retension sutures on abdominal pressure after abdominal surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of retention sutures on abdominal pressure and postoperative prognosis in abdominal surgery patients. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included patients who were admitted to Daping Hospital from May 15, 2014 to October 11, 2014. A total of 57 patients were enrol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Hao, Liu, Dong, Qi, Hai-Feng, Liang, Ze-Ping, Zhang, Xiu-Zhu, Jiang, Dong-Po, Zhang, Lian-Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6114125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29429775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.08.008
_version_ 1783351138464038912
author Tang, Hao
Liu, Dong
Qi, Hai-Feng
Liang, Ze-Ping
Zhang, Xiu-Zhu
Jiang, Dong-Po
Zhang, Lian-Yang
author_facet Tang, Hao
Liu, Dong
Qi, Hai-Feng
Liang, Ze-Ping
Zhang, Xiu-Zhu
Jiang, Dong-Po
Zhang, Lian-Yang
author_sort Tang, Hao
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of retention sutures on abdominal pressure and postoperative prognosis in abdominal surgery patients. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included patients who were admitted to Daping Hospital from May 15, 2014 to October 11, 2014. A total of 57 patients were enrolled, including 18 patients in the “U” type retention suture group, 17 patients in the intermittent retention suture group, and 22 patients in non-retention suture group. The demographic data, clinical data and risk factors for abdominal wound dehiscence were recorded. The bladder pressure (IVP) was monitored preoperatively, intraoperatively, and four days postoperatively. Additionally, the incidence of abdominal wound dehiscence and infection 14 days after the operation was recorded. RESULTS: During the operation, the IVP decreased and then increased; it was at its lowest 1 h after the start of the operation (5.3 mmHg ± 3.2 mmHg) and peaked after tension-reducing (8.8 mmHg ± 4.0 mmHg). The IVP values in the “U” type retention suture group and intermittent retention suture group were higher than in the non-retention suture group 4 days after operation (p < 0.005). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores were 3.9 ± 2.2, 3.8 ± 2.0, and 3.0 ± 1.0 in the retention suture group, intermittent retention suture group and non-retention suture group, respectively. The VAS pain scores in the “U” type tension-reducing group and intermittent tension-reducing group were higher than in the non-tension-reducing group (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Although retention sutures may reduce the incidence of postoperative wound dehiscence in abdominal surgery patients, they can increase the IVP and postoperative pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6114125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61141252018-08-31 Effect of retension sutures on abdominal pressure after abdominal surgery Tang, Hao Liu, Dong Qi, Hai-Feng Liang, Ze-Ping Zhang, Xiu-Zhu Jiang, Dong-Po Zhang, Lian-Yang Chin J Traumatol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of retention sutures on abdominal pressure and postoperative prognosis in abdominal surgery patients. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included patients who were admitted to Daping Hospital from May 15, 2014 to October 11, 2014. A total of 57 patients were enrolled, including 18 patients in the “U” type retention suture group, 17 patients in the intermittent retention suture group, and 22 patients in non-retention suture group. The demographic data, clinical data and risk factors for abdominal wound dehiscence were recorded. The bladder pressure (IVP) was monitored preoperatively, intraoperatively, and four days postoperatively. Additionally, the incidence of abdominal wound dehiscence and infection 14 days after the operation was recorded. RESULTS: During the operation, the IVP decreased and then increased; it was at its lowest 1 h after the start of the operation (5.3 mmHg ± 3.2 mmHg) and peaked after tension-reducing (8.8 mmHg ± 4.0 mmHg). The IVP values in the “U” type retention suture group and intermittent retention suture group were higher than in the non-retention suture group 4 days after operation (p < 0.005). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores were 3.9 ± 2.2, 3.8 ± 2.0, and 3.0 ± 1.0 in the retention suture group, intermittent retention suture group and non-retention suture group, respectively. The VAS pain scores in the “U” type tension-reducing group and intermittent tension-reducing group were higher than in the non-tension-reducing group (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Although retention sutures may reduce the incidence of postoperative wound dehiscence in abdominal surgery patients, they can increase the IVP and postoperative pain. Elsevier 2018-02 2018-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6114125/ /pubmed/29429775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.08.008 Text en © 2018 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Tang, Hao
Liu, Dong
Qi, Hai-Feng
Liang, Ze-Ping
Zhang, Xiu-Zhu
Jiang, Dong-Po
Zhang, Lian-Yang
Effect of retension sutures on abdominal pressure after abdominal surgery
title Effect of retension sutures on abdominal pressure after abdominal surgery
title_full Effect of retension sutures on abdominal pressure after abdominal surgery
title_fullStr Effect of retension sutures on abdominal pressure after abdominal surgery
title_full_unstemmed Effect of retension sutures on abdominal pressure after abdominal surgery
title_short Effect of retension sutures on abdominal pressure after abdominal surgery
title_sort effect of retension sutures on abdominal pressure after abdominal surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6114125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29429775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.08.008
work_keys_str_mv AT tanghao effectofretensionsuturesonabdominalpressureafterabdominalsurgery
AT liudong effectofretensionsuturesonabdominalpressureafterabdominalsurgery
AT qihaifeng effectofretensionsuturesonabdominalpressureafterabdominalsurgery
AT liangzeping effectofretensionsuturesonabdominalpressureafterabdominalsurgery
AT zhangxiuzhu effectofretensionsuturesonabdominalpressureafterabdominalsurgery
AT jiangdongpo effectofretensionsuturesonabdominalpressureafterabdominalsurgery
AT zhanglianyang effectofretensionsuturesonabdominalpressureafterabdominalsurgery